Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ian" wrote in message om... Greetings, I'm part of a student team working on developing AX.25 code for an amature satellite application. We have been considering both versions 2.0 and 2.2 but are not clear on the differences between the two, if any. Does anyone have a good enough understanding to explain them to me? Thank you. That would be a good homework project, but not really all that useful, just implement using the 2.2 specification. Consider adding the PE1CHL enhancements, per the ARRL networking conference procedings, Volume 14 I think. Might as well design for these from the start, the protocol works much better if you include them: Extended sequence numbers via SABME. No fixed maximum frame size. Adaptive FRACK via measured RTT. Slow start a la TCP. Selective reject and out-of-sequuece receive frame queueing. Good research projects: Adaptive frame size. Is FRMR really useful? There is a good deal of source code available, some good, some very bad. Google will turn it up for you. -- ... Hank Hank: http://horedson.home.att.net W0RLI: http://w0rli.home.att.net |