![]() |
|
T33C online log accuracy??
made 2 contacts, first on April 6th, second on April 7th, but neither QSO
listed on T33 website online log??? 73! 9A3MN |
In article ,
"Zlatko Feric" wrote: made 2 contacts, first on April 6th, second on April 7th, but neither QSO listed on T33 website online log??? 73! 9A3MN It is like Texas weather. If you don't like what you see, just wait and it will change. The first time went to http://www.df3cb.com/oqrs2/t33c/index.php it only showed one SSB QSO and no RTTY so I assumed I was not in the log and worked them again. Just checked back and I now have 9 QSOs showing - most RTTY. GL de Dick, AA5VU |
In article ,
"Zlatko Feric" wrote: made 2 contacts, first on April 6th, second on April 7th, but neither QSO listed on T33 website online log??? 73! 9A3MN It is like Texas weather. If you don't like what you see, just wait and it will change. The first time went to http://www.df3cb.com/oqrs2/t33c/index.php it only showed one SSB QSO and no RTTY so I assumed I was not in the log and worked them again. Just checked back and I now have 9 QSOs showing - most RTTY. GL de Dick, AA5VU |
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to
know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA "Zlatko Feric" wrote in message ... made 2 contacts, first on April 6th, second on April 7th, but neither QSO listed on T33 website online log??? 73! 9A3MN |
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to
know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Mac N8TT -- J. Mc Laughlin - Michigan USA "Zlatko Feric" wrote in message ... made 2 contacts, first on April 6th, second on April 7th, but neither QSO listed on T33 website online log??? 73! 9A3MN |
J. McLaughlin wrote:
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever. It has not improved the chances of finding and working the DX, it has merely made DXing into a computerized checkbox game. It has also made the DX-cluster unusable, because these days you will find more URLs for online logs than actual DX-spots. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming, 'Wow, what a ride!' |
J. McLaughlin wrote:
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever. It has not improved the chances of finding and working the DX, it has merely made DXing into a computerized checkbox game. It has also made the DX-cluster unusable, because these days you will find more URLs for online logs than actual DX-spots. Peter Lemken DF5JT Berlin -- Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in a pretty and well-preserved body, but rather to skid in broadside, thoroughly used up, totally worn out and loudly proclaiming, 'Wow, what a ride!' |
Peter Lemken wrote:
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever. Must disagree, Peter. On-line logs should dramatically cut the number of "insurance" QSOs, thus reducing the pile-ups and giving more people a chance. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
Peter Lemken wrote:
I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever. Must disagree, Peter. On-line logs should dramatically cut the number of "insurance" QSOs, thus reducing the pile-ups and giving more people a chance. 73 ... WA7AA -- Anti-spam measu look me up on qrz.com if you need to reply directly |
Zoran Brlecic said :
Peter Lemken wrote: I found that the log program doubled my contacts. Still, valuable to know that one is somewhere in the log. Great idea. Really? I find online logs the worst idea ever. Must disagree, Peter. On-line logs should dramatically cut the number of "insurance" QSOs, thus reducing the pile-ups and giving more people a chance. I will chime up with support for Zoran here. I popped 3B9C on 10 and 12 SSB last week and frankly, it was ESP at best. I waited to check the logs to see whether or not my Q's were in fact in there, and I saw that they were. I won't be wasting my time with insurance Qs on those bands, nor will anybody need to step over my signal to get through on 10/12 again. 73 de Peter, W2IRT (ex-AB2NZ, VE3THX) Please reply to Double-you Two Eye Are Tee at Arrl.net |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:13 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com