Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I cleaned, fixed, checked and finally uploaded all my recorded contacts
for the past 11 years and after doing so the LoTW web page reported back to me the number of confirmed contacts--totaling 3% of what I entered. I'm not a big time station and I don't force the power company to go to their nuclear backup plan when I key the radio, but is 3% typical? Is there any practical way to see which stations are confirmed? I understand that the league doesn't want anyone trolling for broken callsigns, but the alternative would be to enter each call ever worked to see if they are also uploaded. Yikes. Gary AB5RM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary,
Unfortunately, if the bulk of your log is older contacts it is probably about right. I sent in logs back to 1979. I have probably 10 percent matches on contacts, mostly QSO's within the last two years, don't have any prior to 2000. So far I have 37 countries verified on LOTW. I operate mostly RTTY and other digital modes and since virtually all the digital operators have computers and log with computers I would guess that I am getting a better rate of return than hams operating other modes. Also I would guess that contests rack up better returns than casual QSO's. Why people aren't sending in their older logs I can't understand. I hope that LOTW continues to grow. I have never minded sending a few green stamps for foreign QSL's and certainly for DXpeditions, but I am getting sick and tired of getting ripped off by foreign postage thieves. I feel myself wanting to soap-box which I will avoid and just say that I hope people continue to join LOTW and that all the issues that need to be dealt with (and there are some) can be accomplished to get the full support of all hams. Trav, WX0Y |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary,
Unfortunately, if the bulk of your log is older contacts it is probably about right. I sent in logs back to 1979. I have probably 10 percent matches on contacts, mostly QSO's within the last two years, don't have any prior to 2000. So far I have 37 countries verified on LOTW. I operate mostly RTTY and other digital modes and since virtually all the digital operators have computers and log with computers I would guess that I am getting a better rate of return than hams operating other modes. Also I would guess that contests rack up better returns than casual QSO's. Why people aren't sending in their older logs I can't understand. I hope that LOTW continues to grow. I have never minded sending a few green stamps for foreign QSL's and certainly for DXpeditions, but I am getting sick and tired of getting ripped off by foreign postage thieves. I feel myself wanting to soap-box which I will avoid and just say that I hope people continue to join LOTW and that all the issues that need to be dealt with (and there are some) can be accomplished to get the full support of all hams. Trav, WX0Y |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" wrote I cleaned, fixed, checked and finally uploaded all my recorded contacts for the past 11 years and after doing so the LoTW web page reported back to me the number of confirmed contacts--totaling 3% of what I entered. Hi Gary, I have about 28,000 QSO's entered into LoTW, and just under 2,600 confirmations. The QSO's I entered are those I've made since I started using computer logging in the late 80's (I didn't go back and key in any paper logs). So my 'return rate' is just over 9%, but it is not uniform over the years. The more recent years (2002, 2003) have return rates in the 30% range, and there are almost no confirmations prior to about 1995. Is there any practical way to see which stations are confirmed? Yes, there's a search engine which allows you to display only those contacts which have been confirmed by the system, sorted by call or by date (and maybe some other choices I don't remember right now. The lions share of my QSL's are from contesters, and 90% are US stations, although I have returns from 67 countries. Currently there are only about 7,000 individuals who have entered data into the system. The DXCC 'engine' will come on line Wednesday, finally giving some 'output' from LoTW, and I'd expect that will draw a lot more logs into the system. Also, the major logging programs are starting to deploy products which 'automagically' input data to LoTW without separate action on the part of the operator. As this capability becomes ubiquitous in logging software, I think the level of participation will rapidly rise. People may not be aggressive in capturing old log data and sending it to LoTW, but going forward we'll likely see a quickly rising percentage of returns on 'new' QSO's. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gary" wrote I cleaned, fixed, checked and finally uploaded all my recorded contacts for the past 11 years and after doing so the LoTW web page reported back to me the number of confirmed contacts--totaling 3% of what I entered. Hi Gary, I have about 28,000 QSO's entered into LoTW, and just under 2,600 confirmations. The QSO's I entered are those I've made since I started using computer logging in the late 80's (I didn't go back and key in any paper logs). So my 'return rate' is just over 9%, but it is not uniform over the years. The more recent years (2002, 2003) have return rates in the 30% range, and there are almost no confirmations prior to about 1995. Is there any practical way to see which stations are confirmed? Yes, there's a search engine which allows you to display only those contacts which have been confirmed by the system, sorted by call or by date (and maybe some other choices I don't remember right now. The lions share of my QSL's are from contesters, and 90% are US stations, although I have returns from 67 countries. Currently there are only about 7,000 individuals who have entered data into the system. The DXCC 'engine' will come on line Wednesday, finally giving some 'output' from LoTW, and I'd expect that will draw a lot more logs into the system. Also, the major logging programs are starting to deploy products which 'automagically' input data to LoTW without separate action on the part of the operator. As this capability becomes ubiquitous in logging software, I think the level of participation will rapidly rise. People may not be aggressive in capturing old log data and sending it to LoTW, but going forward we'll likely see a quickly rising percentage of returns on 'new' QSO's. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mac Software for LoTW | Dx | |||
Mac Software for LoTW | Dx | |||
Mac Software for LoTW | Dx | |||
Logbook of the World (LoTW) Yahoo Group | Dx |