LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old July 14th 03, 12:01 AM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Caljsi" wrote in message
...
I'm rather surprised that any amateur would dismiss the BPL

initiative, or
be so cynical as to believe that the appeal for funds in this case is the

ARRL
"crying wolf". Most of you have a search engine and I suggest you look up

the
studies done to date on the effect of BPL on the HF and low VHF spectrum.

I
particularly suggest checking the results of tests in Japan. And take a

look
at the relevant articles in the Web Extra section of the ARRL website.
If you don't want to contribute money to the ARRL's efforts to fight

the
BPL initiative, then may I suggest you look up the comments filed on

03-104 and
file some well thought out reply comments; we have until 6 August.
Cal K4JSI

It really is pathetic isn't it Cal? This is the first and ONLY time I have
sent in a donation. Thats how serious I take it.

Dan/W4NTI



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Boatanchors 20 December 16th 04 07:51 AM
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Boatanchors 0 December 8th 04 09:31 PM
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? Dr. Slick Antenna 104 September 6th 03 02:27 AM
BPL industry take on why power lines are not antennas W1RFI Antenna 4 August 30th 03 12:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017