Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Let's see, we have several hundred thousand amateur radio enthusiasts' needs
to consider versus hundreds of millions of computer/data users' needs. Who do I think will win? Come on, get real. Save your money for a new electronic doohickey that will utilize the increased bandwidth with which we are about to be blessed. Change is inevitable - resistance is futile. Ed Cregger, NM2K "Caljsi" wrote in message ... I'm rather surprised that any amateur would dismiss the BPL initiative, or be so cynical as to believe that the appeal for funds in this case is the ARRL "crying wolf". Most of you have a search engine and I suggest you look up the studies done to date on the effect of BPL on the HF and low VHF spectrum. I particularly suggest checking the results of tests in Japan. And take a look at the relevant articles in the Web Extra section of the ARRL website. If you don't want to contribute money to the ARRL's efforts to fight the BPL initiative, then may I suggest you look up the comments filed on 03-104 and file some well thought out reply comments; we have until 6 August. Cal K4JSI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C | Boatanchors | |||
Derivation of the Reflection Coefficient? | Antenna | |||
BPL industry take on why power lines are not antennas | Antenna |