RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Equipment (https://www.radiobanter.com/equipment/)
-   -   CW Audio Filter (https://www.radiobanter.com/equipment/10531-cw-audio-filter.html)

Matthew and Wendy Plante July 23rd 03 04:12 AM

CW Audio Filter
 
Is CW just FM without an audio signal? So, If I have a FM receiver, can I
install a CW audio filter and pick up CW. Such as... an IC 207H or BC 780xlt
and a Vectronics CW Audio Filter. Thanks
Matthew
KC2KEI
Scars are the proof that man can survive his own stupidity.



Robert Grizzard July 23rd 03 12:02 PM

Matthew and Wendy Plante wrote:
Is CW just FM without an audio signal? So, If I have a FM receiver, can I
install a CW audio filter and pick up CW. Such as... an IC 207H or BC 780xlt
and a Vectronics CW Audio Filter. Thanks


FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.

That being said, one can send Morse in a format receivable on an FM
receiver, but it'll be MCW rather than CW. Feeding a keyed audio
oscillator into an FM transmitter will produce MCW. The caveat here is
it is legal here in the states only from 50.1 to 54 MHz and above 144.1
MHz.

HTH

de kg7yy
--
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself
constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.

I don't want unsolicited commercial E-mail.

Robert Grizzard July 23rd 03 12:02 PM

Matthew and Wendy Plante wrote:
Is CW just FM without an audio signal? So, If I have a FM receiver, can I
install a CW audio filter and pick up CW. Such as... an IC 207H or BC 780xlt
and a Vectronics CW Audio Filter. Thanks


FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.

That being said, one can send Morse in a format receivable on an FM
receiver, but it'll be MCW rather than CW. Feeding a keyed audio
oscillator into an FM transmitter will produce MCW. The caveat here is
it is legal here in the states only from 50.1 to 54 MHz and above 144.1
MHz.

HTH

de kg7yy
--
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself
constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.

I don't want unsolicited commercial E-mail.

Matthew and Wendy Plante July 23rd 03 12:38 PM


"Robert Grizzard" wrote in message
...
Matthew and Wendy Plante wrote:
Is CW just FM without an audio signal? So, If I have a FM receiver, can

I
install a CW audio filter and pick up CW. Such as... an IC 207H or BC

780xlt
and a Vectronics CW Audio Filter. Thanks


FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.

That being said, one can send Morse in a format receivable on an FM
receiver, but it'll be MCW rather than CW. Feeding a keyed audio
oscillator into an FM transmitter will produce MCW. The caveat here is
it is legal here in the states only from 50.1 to 54 MHz and above 144.1
MHz.

HTH

de kg7yy
--
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself
constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.

I don't want unsolicited commercial E-mail.


So, If I had a receiver capable of AM reception, then a CW filter would
work?



Matthew and Wendy Plante July 23rd 03 12:38 PM


"Robert Grizzard" wrote in message
...
Matthew and Wendy Plante wrote:
Is CW just FM without an audio signal? So, If I have a FM receiver, can

I
install a CW audio filter and pick up CW. Such as... an IC 207H or BC

780xlt
and a Vectronics CW Audio Filter. Thanks


FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.

That being said, one can send Morse in a format receivable on an FM
receiver, but it'll be MCW rather than CW. Feeding a keyed audio
oscillator into an FM transmitter will produce MCW. The caveat here is
it is legal here in the states only from 50.1 to 54 MHz and above 144.1
MHz.

HTH

de kg7yy
--
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself
constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.

I don't want unsolicited commercial E-mail.


So, If I had a receiver capable of AM reception, then a CW filter would
work?



Max July 23rd 03 01:09 PM

Hello

So, If I had a receiver capable of AM reception, then a CW filter would
work?


No, then you will need a beatoscillator.

No sound is transmitted when you use CW, the transmitter in only turned
on and off, so on a AM radio you only hear an interupted carrier and no
tone.

Regards Max



Max July 23rd 03 01:09 PM

Hello

So, If I had a receiver capable of AM reception, then a CW filter would
work?


No, then you will need a beatoscillator.

No sound is transmitted when you use CW, the transmitter in only turned
on and off, so on a AM radio you only hear an interupted carrier and no
tone.

Regards Max



Dave Platt July 23rd 03 07:26 PM

FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.


Sure it will! Open the squelch up all the way. You'll hear the
background noise from the band and/or the front-end electronics when
there's no carrier being sent. When the OM at the other end keys up,
the FM receiver will lock onto the carrier, and happily demodulate the
(nonexistant) sidebands - it'll go silent. No CW filter needed... in
fact it'd make the noise/silence difference harder to hear.

Admittedly, trying to copy "negative noise" CW is likely to be a real
hassle at first, but I imagine that one can train oneself to do it
(just as one can train oneself to read a book held upside-down).

For _conventional_ CW reception, you need something rather different.

;-)

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Dave Platt July 23rd 03 07:26 PM

FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.


Sure it will! Open the squelch up all the way. You'll hear the
background noise from the band and/or the front-end electronics when
there's no carrier being sent. When the OM at the other end keys up,
the FM receiver will lock onto the carrier, and happily demodulate the
(nonexistant) sidebands - it'll go silent. No CW filter needed... in
fact it'd make the noise/silence difference harder to hear.

Admittedly, trying to copy "negative noise" CW is likely to be a real
hassle at first, but I imagine that one can train oneself to do it
(just as one can train oneself to read a book held upside-down).

For _conventional_ CW reception, you need something rather different.

;-)

--
Dave Platt AE6EO
Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior
I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will
boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads!

Bob Miller July 24th 03 01:40 AM

On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:38:14 GMT, "Matthew and Wendy Plante"
wrote:


"Robert Grizzard" wrote in message
...
Matthew and Wendy Plante wrote:
Is CW just FM without an audio signal? So, If I have a FM receiver, can

I
install a CW audio filter and pick up CW. Such as... an IC 207H or BC

780xlt
and a Vectronics CW Audio Filter. Thanks


FM receivers are designed to not respond to amplitude variations. CW is
about as pure an example of "information conveyed by variations in
amplitude" as one is likely to find. To cut to the chase, what you
propose won't work.

That being said, one can send Morse in a format receivable on an FM
receiver, but it'll be MCW rather than CW. Feeding a keyed audio
oscillator into an FM transmitter will produce MCW. The caveat here is
it is legal here in the states only from 50.1 to 54 MHz and above 144.1
MHz.

HTH

de kg7yy
--
The appearance of my E-mail address in any venue does not in and of itself
constitute a solicitation of bulk or commercial E-mail.

I don't want unsolicited commercial E-mail.


So, If I had a receiver capable of AM reception, then a CW filter would
work?


No, with AM reception, you'll just hear the CW signal as a staticky,
hashy sound. You need a receiver with a beat frequency oscillator, a
BFO, to receive CW with a nice tone.

The CW filter has nothing to do with receiving the CW signal, other
than narrowing the bandwidth to cut out interfering signals.

Bob
k5qwg



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com