Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change
"amdx" wrote in
: "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I prefer getting the code requirement back up to somewhere between 13 and 20 wpm for all hams. SC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change
Slow Code wrote:
"amdx" wrote in : "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. Why don't you start by being civil on Usenet? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "amdx" wrote in : "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I prefer getting the code requirement back up to somewhere between 13 and 20 wpm for all hams. SC Hi Slow Code, I don't normally open your posts ( didn't note the sender this time) so I don't know if your the nicest person on usenet or a jerk. I do know that your posts seem to turn into arguments about personalities and disrupt the flow of helpful info that can pass on rec.radio.amateur.antenna. I think this newsgroup is dying a slow death and suspect many are leaving because of drivel such as yours. I know I have contemplated dropping rec.radio.amateur.antenna off of my list, there is just to much on the net to put up with much garbage. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I have been listening to the hams bands for years and noted plenty of room for intelligence and civility, I don't think no-code has added in more room. The biggest problem I have noted is intentional interference on polite roundtable conversation. Hmm! That seems to be what you do, only you do it on multiple frequencies (newsgroups) at the same time. Mike |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change
"amdx" wrote in
: "Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... "amdx" wrote in : "Charlie" wrote in message ... Enough IS enough children!! You all are acting like babies! Please people..let's let the Spirit of the Holidays prevail in our hearts. -- 73,Charlie-AD5TH (20 wpm Extra - 1995) www.ad5th.com Well, uh, uh, slow code started it! I most certainly did not start it. I'm the nicest person on usenet. I'm here to help guide and motive people on how they can make themselves better radio amateurs, unfortunately, some of those I'm trying to help prefer to be stupid and lazy, and they flame people that try to help them and they are down right rude. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I prefer getting the code requirement back up to somewhere between 13 and 20 wpm for all hams. SC Hi Slow Code, I don't normally open your posts ( didn't note the sender this time) so I don't know if your the nicest person on usenet or a jerk. I do know that your posts seem to turn into arguments about personalities and disrupt the flow of helpful info that can pass on rec.radio.amateur.antenna. I think this newsgroup is dying a slow death and suspect many are leaving because of drivel such as yours. I know I have contemplated dropping rec.radio.amateur.antenna off of my list, there is just to much on the net to put up with much garbage. You can see the no-code license was a bad idea, we need to require all hams pass a code test to bring intelligence and civility back to ham radio and the repeaters. I have been listening to the hams bands for years and noted plenty of room for intelligence and civility, I don't think no-code has added in more room. The biggest problem I have noted is intentional interference on polite roundtable conversation. Hmm! That seems to be what you do, only you do it on multiple frequencies (newsgroups) at the same time. Mike No one will enjoy being a ham with the bands totally sound like 11 meters. SC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lets be RUDE and INSULT each OTHER for a change | Antenna | |||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments | Policy |