![]() |
Last Weekend To File FCC Comment
What's all this fuss about BPL? Are the fussers trying to
make out that they're CBers who are unable to sort out weaker signal reception? Ham Radio isn't about broadcast-quality signals; it's about the technical challenge of achieving communication under your own efforts. CBers might buy their rigs off-the-shelf and send them back to the shop to be repaired when faulty but not _REAL_ Radio Hams! Likewise, when there's a bit of QRN around such as BPL, that's no difficulty for _REAL_ Radio Hams to sort out! "yea right" wrote in message ... "The limit for an unintentional emitter on HF is 30 uV/m at 30 meters from the source," he said. "If you take a dipole cut for 3.5 MHz and put it in a 30 uV/m field, you'll have a noise reading of S9 plus 16 dB at your transceiver." The FCC has extended the comment period for BPL. If you value radio, this may be the last and only chance to have your voice heard to stop BPL from destroying your hobby. The FCC has extended the comment period for BPL |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:13 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com