![]() |
Antenna polarity?
My brother is broadcasting from a little low-mW FM transmitter he's using to
broadcast a web-streamed station to a receiver in his small home. The receiver is using a dipole and the transmitter a telescoping. Should the telescoping antenna be vertical? Thanks. |
Antenna polarity?
"Gone Fishin'" wrote in message
... My brother is broadcasting from a little low-mW FM transmitter he's using to broadcast a web-streamed station to a receiver in his small home. The receiver is using a dipole and the transmitter a telescoping. Should the telescoping antenna be vertical? Thanks. This is a NG for amateur radio and we are not licensed to broadcast, and therefore we cannot help you. I suggest you try rec.radio.11m.pirates.and.other.losers |
Antenna polarity?
On 1/28/2014 3:19 AM, Gone Fishin' wrote:
My brother is broadcasting from a little low-mW FM transmitter he's using to broadcast a web-streamed station to a receiver in his small home. The receiver is using a dipole and the transmitter a telescoping. Should the telescoping antenna be vertical? Thanks. This is a more complicated question than it first appears. In general, the two should be parallel - that is, if the transmitting antenna is vertical, the receiving antenna should also be vertical. And if the transmitting antenna is horizontal, the receiving antenna should be horizontal. There can be a large loss when one is vertical and the other horizontal. However, this is also only true in free space. In your brother's home, there will be reflections which can change the polarity of the signal. So the polarity of the signal can change around the house so that the signal is not perfectly horizontally or vertically polarized. Another concern is the radiation pattern of the antennas. Simple wire antennas such as the telescoping whip and dipole have maximum radiation perpendicular to the direction of the wire, with very little off the ends of the wire. This means that for a vertically polarized whip or dipole, maximum radiation will be in a horizontal direction. So if the antenna is in the attic and he's trying to receive in the basement, he may not get much signal. But again, reflections will affect the signal. There might even be places the reflections merge to cancel the signal out - in which case moving the transmitting antenna a few inches can make a difference. Theoretically it would be possible to calculate all of the effects of the above, but he'd have model the entire house in formulae, including anything which will reflect or attenuate the signal (i.e. metal, concrete, etc.). This would take a large amount of effort, and will only be as accurate as the input data. If it were my house, I would start with the two having the same polarization and experiment in the places he wants to hear the signal. Change the polarization on the receiver (i.e. hold the receiver in various positions) so see what effect it has. Then change the polarization of the transmitting antenna and repeat the experiment. See what works the best in his situation. OTOH, if he's happy with the results he has now, I would suggest he not touch it. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry, AI0K ================== |
Antenna polarity?
On 28/01/2014 08:19, Gone Fishin' wrote:
My brother is broadcasting from a little low-mW FM transmitter he's using to broadcast a web-streamed station to a receiver in his small home. The receiver is using a dipole and the transmitter a telescoping. Should the telescoping antenna be vertical? Try one of these: http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/HELENIC-MI...a0c8b#ht_0wt_0 :-) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com