Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/24/2015 12:00 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 2/24/2015 11:32 AM, FranK Turner-Smith G3VKI wrote: "AndyW" wrote in message ... On 24/02/2015 12:47, gareth wrote: What is the point of digital voice when there are already AM, SSB and FM for those who want to appear indistinguishable from CBers? Perhaps it is cynicism from the manufacturers who introduce such things as they see their traditional highly-priced corner of the market being wiped away by SDR technologies? Bandwidth reduction for one. If you can encode and compress speech sufficiently then you can use less bandwidth in transmission. That's the bit I have trouble getting my head around. Back in the 1970s and 1980s digital transmissions used a much greater bandwidth than their analogue equivalents. Sampling at 2.2 x max frequency x number of bits plus housekeeping bits etc. etc. A UK standard 625 line PAL video transmission would have used a bandwidth of over 400MHz! Times have changed and left me behind, but I've still got me beer so who cares? But you forget compression. For instance, unless there is a scene change, the vast majority of a television picture does not change from frame to frame. Even if the camera moves, the picture shifts but doesn't change all that much. Why waste all of that bandwidth resending information the receiver already has? And voice isn't continuous; it has lots of pauses. Some are very noticeable, while others are so short we don't consciously hear them, but they are there. And once you've compressed everything you can out of the original signal, you can do bit compression, similar to zipping a file for sending. There are lots of ways to compress a signal before sending it digitally. About the only one which can't be compressed is pure white noise - which, of course, is only a concept (nothing is "pure"). I think that depends on what you mean by "pure". Sounds very non-technical to me. Even noise can be compressed since if it is truly noise, you don't need to send the data, just send the one bit that says there is no signal, just noise. lol A friend worked in sonar where the data was collected on ships and transmitted via satellite to shore for signal processing rather than doing any compression on the data and sending the useful info. As the signal was nearly all "noise" trying to do any compression on it, even the aspects that weren't "pure" white noise, would potentially have masked the signals. Sonar is all about pulling the signal out of the noise. -- Rick |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|