On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:52:39 GMT, Ed
wrote:

Please continue more comparison here once you have familiarized
yourself with the new FT-60... Thanks.

Well, the only comparisons I can make are what's based on
documentation from Kenwoods website as I don't have a THG71.I have no
way of comparing say sensitivity.
--
To reply, remove TheObvious from my e-mail address.

Go to Eham.com and look at what the hams are saying about the equipment.

Steve


"Evan Platt" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 21:52:39 GMT, Ed
wrote:

Please continue more comparison here once you have familiarized
yourself with the new FT-60... Thanks.

Well, the only comparisons I can make are what's based on
documentation from Kenwoods website as I don't have a THG71.I have no
way of comparing say sensitivity.
--
To reply, remove TheObvious from my e-mail address.

On Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:38:56 -0500, "Steve" wrote:

Go to Eham.com and look at what the hams are saying about the equipment.

Not sure if that was intended to be directed at me. Ed asked for a
comparison - I told him I can't make a comparison on 2 items when I
only have one.
--
To reply, remove TheObvious from my e-mail address.

Well, the only comparisons I can make are what's based on
documentation from Kenwoods website as I don't have a THG71.I have no
way of comparing say sensitivity.

Something you can't get from documentation is "usability" or ease of use.
Historically, I have found Kenwood to feature a much more user friendly
menu system compared to Yaesu. In part, I was looking for comments in this
regard, as well as other "feel" type opinions that one can't get from
looking at a picture.



Ed