FS: 500W solid state HF amp.....
FS: Solid state Skywalker 500 linear amp with 200amp metered power supply.
Puts out over 700 watts on 75M. Amp it 9+ in appearance and 100% in operational quality. Substantially less than 80 watts drives it full power. Also has bandpass filters for all HF bands. It's very quiet and very efficient. $850. |
Odd... For some reason, this amplifier is available in kit form only, and only
to Hams outside of the US of A..... They are located in Surfside Beach, South Carolina... Perhaps the Amplifier Kit does not meet FCC regulations (works for 11/10 Meters without Ham License verification) I don't have personally verified information on this amplifer, and was interested in it before I found it couldn't be purchased from the manufacturer of the kit in the US.. If anyone else has better information on this amp, I would be interested, as I could use a low priced solid state amp if it doesn't pollute the bands I work. (primarily 80, 40 and 20 meters) Thanks --Rick AH7H MICHAEL LINGER wrote: FS: Solid state Skywalker 500 linear amp with 200amp metered power supply. Puts out over 700 watts on 75M. Amp it 9+ in appearance and 100% in operational quality. Substantially less than 80 watts drives it full power. Also has bandpass filters for all HF bands. It's very quiet and very efficient. $850. |
In article ,
Rick Frazier wrote: Odd... For some reason, this amplifier is available in kit form only, and only to Hams outside of the US of A..... They are located in Surfside Beach, South Carolina... Perhaps the Amplifier Kit does not meet FCC regulations (works for 11/10 Meters without Ham License verification) That does seem to be the case. As I understand it, it is not currently legal to manufacture or sell an external power amplifier (or sell one as a kit) which can operate between 24 and 35 MHz. Such amps cannot be certificated, under current FCC rules, and external power amps are the only sort of amateur-radio gear which does require certification. I don't believe that ham-license verification comes into it at all, in this particular portion of the rules - commercial amps simply can't be manufactured, or kitted, or sold in new condition to anyone, if they can amplify between 24 and 35 MHz. The FCC has proposed (on their own initiative) that this restriction be dropped. It was never popular with hams and manufacturers, for obvious reasons, and it doesn't seem to have been effective at keeping CB "linear" amps from being churned out and sold in quantity... the original goal of the rule. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
Dave Platt wrote: In article , Rick Frazier wrote: Odd... For some reason, this amplifier is available in kit form only, and only to Hams outside of the US of A..... They are located in Surfside Beach, South Carolina... Perhaps the Amplifier Kit does not meet FCC regulations (works for 11/10 Meters without Ham License verification) That does seem to be the case. As I understand it, it is not currently legal to manufacture or sell an external power amplifier (or sell one as a kit) which can operate between 24 and 35 MHz. Such amps cannot be certificated, under current FCC rules, and external power amps are the only sort of amateur-radio gear which does require certification. I don't believe that ham-license verification comes into it at all, in this particular portion of the rules - commercial amps simply can't be manufactured, or kitted, or sold in new condition to anyone, if they can amplify between 24 and 35 MHz. The FCC has proposed (on their own initiative) that this restriction be dropped. It was never popular with hams and manufacturers, for obvious reasons, and it doesn't seem to have been effective at keeping CB "linear" amps from being churned out and sold in quantity... the original goal of the rule. License verification is not part of the FCC rules. However most manufacturers of amps will supply instructions on how to modify them for 12/10 meter operation upon proof of license. John |
In article ,
John wrote: License verification is not part of the FCC rules. However most manufacturers of amps will supply instructions on how to modify them for 12/10 meter operation upon proof of license. Yup. It's legal for a licensed amateur to perform such a modification (no more than one amp per year or one per model per year, I can't remember which), and it's also legal for an amateur to sell an amp once modified to another amateur for amateur use. License verification isn't required by the FCC, but I imagine it's a good way for a manufacturer to show a good-faith defense against charges that they're selling amps intended to be modified for CB use, and for amateurs to make sure that they're selling used amps in a legal way. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
|
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 20:09:33 GMT, John
wrote: Dick wrote: On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 16:23:23 -0000, (Dave Platt) wrote: In article , John wrote: License verification is not part of the FCC rules. However most manufacturers of amps will supply instructions on how to modify them for 12/10 meter operation upon proof of license. Yup. It's legal for a licensed amateur to perform such a modification (no more than one amp per year or one per model per year, I can't remember which), and it's also legal for an amateur to sell an amp once modified to another amateur for amateur use. The wording is no more than one unit of one model. Interesting that you can build one from scratch, or modify a commercially built amp, but you cannot build one from a kit capable of operation below 144 But you can build a kit and modify that. I used to use a Heath SB1000 amp. I enabled 10m from the start - just did not install the wire that prevented it from working. That's about as simple as a mod can get and still not cause a problem with the FCC about not readily modifiable to operate on 27MHz. John I'm not sure about that John. 97.315 is pretty specific about kits. 97.315 (b) says that any amplifier kit has to be Certified by the FCC. I would think the chances of getting the FCC to certify a kit of parts capable of building a 10-meter amplifier would be slim to less than zero. Heath doesn't make kits anymore, and these rules were written after Heath went out of the ham radio business. What you stated was true many years ago. The only way to satisfy the requirements now is to modify a factory built, certified amplifier, or build one on your own from scratch without using a kit (unless of course you can find a certified kit. Good luck on that.) Dick |
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:54:44 -0700, Dick LeadWinger wrote:
The only way to satisfy the requirements now is to modify a factory built, certified amplifier, or build one on your own from scratch without using a kit (unless of course you can find a certified kit. Good luck on that.) Dick And of course you can always buy one from another amateur that is already modified or buy one purchased new prior to April 28, 1978. My comments above were related to buying something new. Dick |
"Dick" LeadWinger wrote in message ... On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:54:44 -0700, Dick LeadWinger wrote: The only way to satisfy the requirements now is to modify a factory built, certified amplifier, or build one on your own from scratch without using a kit (unless of course you can find a certified kit. Good luck on that.) Dick And of course you can always buy one from another amateur that is already modified or buy one purchased new prior to April 28, 1978. My comments above were related to buying something new. Dick Didn't the builder of these kits get cited by FCC a couple of years ago for selling them? Jerry |
In article ,
Jerry wrote: And of course you can always buy one from another amateur that is already modified or buy one purchased new prior to April 28, 1978. My comments above were related to buying something new. Didn't the builder of these kits get cited by FCC a couple of years ago for selling them? I don't know the details, but that certainly seems to be implied by what he writes on his website when he explains why his products are only available for sale to non-US amateurs. He complains that only one company (Communications Concepts) can get authorization from the FCC to sell certificated amplifier kits. In looking through the Communications Concepts web site, though, I don't see any _complete_ amplifier kits at all, nor do I see any discussion of certification status. C.C. sells PC boards, and selected sets of components which can be used to construct some of the Motorola reference-design amplifiers, but they state quite clearly that they do not provide manuals, heatsinks, chassis, connectors, etc. needed to complete the amplifier. Since you cannot construct a working amplifier solely from what Communications Concepts is willing to sell you, the result isn't something which would require certification. An amateur could construct one amp per year using their components (plus others that s/he acquires elsewhere) without having to have the resulting amplifier certificated. I suspect that this is the difference. Communications Concepts is a component supplier (and components by themselves do not require certification), while the kit builder in question is providing completely kitted amplifiers (which do require certification). That's probably enough to make the difference between all-is-OK, and an enforcement action. The kits *could* have been designed in a way which would allow them to be certificated - they'd just have to have a difficult-to-defeat rolloff of the upper HF frequencies - but the designer didn't do this, and for this reason they don't meet the current rules for certification. This issue seems likely to become moot within a few months, as the FCC is proposing to drop the restriction on construction and sale of amps capable of operating in the upper HF band. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
|
"Dave Platt" wrote in message ... In article , Jerry wrote: And of course you can always buy one from another amateur that is already modified or buy one purchased new prior to April 28, 1978. My comments above were related to buying something new. Didn't the builder of these kits get cited by FCC a couple of years ago for selling them? I don't know the details, but that certainly seems to be implied by what he writes on his website when he explains why his products are only available for sale to non-US amateurs. He complains that only one company (Communications Concepts) can get authorization from the FCC to sell certificated amplifier kits. In looking through the Communications Concepts web site, though, I don't see any _complete_ amplifier kits at all, nor do I see any discussion of certification status. C.C. sells PC boards, and selected sets of components which can be used to construct some of the Motorola reference-design amplifiers, but they state quite clearly that they do not provide manuals, heatsinks, chassis, connectors, etc. needed to complete the amplifier. Since you cannot construct a working amplifier solely from what Communications Concepts is willing to sell you, the result isn't something which would require certification. An amateur could construct one amp per year using their components (plus others that s/he acquires elsewhere) without having to have the resulting amplifier certificated. I suspect that this is the difference. Communications Concepts is a component supplier (and components by themselves do not require certification), while the kit builder in question is providing completely kitted amplifiers (which do require certification). That's probably enough to make the difference between all-is-OK, and an enforcement action. The kits *could* have been designed in a way which would allow them to be certificated - they'd just have to have a difficult-to-defeat rolloff of the upper HF frequencies - but the designer didn't do this, and for this reason they don't meet the current rules for certification. This issue seems likely to become moot within a few months, as the FCC is proposing to drop the restriction on construction and sale of amps capable of operating in the upper HF band. -- Dave Platt Is there an announced date when this restriction is to be lifted, or is it still just a proposal? Jerry |
In article ,
Jerry wrote: Is there an announced date when this restriction is to be lifted, or is it still just a proposal? To the best of my knowledge it's still just a proposal. This proposal was part of the FCC's "Notice of Proposed Rulemaking" released on 15 April 2004. This was the same NPRM in which the FCC proposed accepting the ARRL's request to "re-farm" the Novice/Tech Plus CW sub-bands, reallocated these for phone operation, and proposed accepting Kenwood's petition to allow auxiliary-station operation in the 2-meter band (thus legalizing Sky Command). The comment and reply-comment end dates were back in June of 2004. I haven't heard anything recent about action on this. It would not surprise me greatly if the FCC chose to do a single revision of the rules, which would incorporate the changes in this NPRM and also formalize the removal of the 5 WPM Morse Code requirement. If that's how they decide to do it, then "sometime later this year" is the best guess I can offer. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com