Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ari Silversteinn" wrote in message
... On Tue, 04 Oct 2005 14:33:52 GMT, Wayne P. Muckleroy wrote: Like I said in another thread, "Emergency" implies IMMEDIATE (not planned) danger to life, limb, or property. It seems that, in your proposal, you are PLANNING to use these frequencies instead of more appropriate ones. I would think that you need to create (and supply) a system that is isolated from broadcast frequencies. Wayne- (KC8UIO) It's not my call, Wayne, it's the client driving the systems. -- But you've already changed it! Initially you said it was to be used at an emergency site, and now you're saying it's to warn of a high-speed train cometh. What the hell gives? Ken |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | General | |||
What Amateur Radio Emergency Communications? | Policy | |||
Emergency Messaging, AM/FM *On Locomotive* | Antenna | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Broadcasting | |||
Amateurs Handle Emergency Comms in Wake of Hurricane Ivan | Shortwave |