![]() |
|
New to VHF/UHF
Rod,
I suspect 144MHz narrowmode activity in your area is rather low (chicken and egg situation). On the other hand, you can make people happy with WA for WAS.. Possibilities: Use sats, Meteorscatter and/or EME. With an IC910 (possibly with an additional preamp) and a 3wl yagi you can do all of those modes. If you want to improve over the IC910 your alternative is a transverter behind a (good) HF rig. See DownEastMicrowave or DB6NT (re latter: Take a breath before looking at prices). An Elecraft with 2m transverter also comes highly recommended by many people. In addition that makes a great HF radio. Yagi's can be had from several sources, good ones are M2 or others (commercial) or DK7ZB (easy homebrew and cheap with great performance). For MS and EME check the page from Joe K1JT for the WSJT computerprogram. Also check the Pingjockey page, the JT65 EME page, bigskyspaces.com, etc. The bigger the station, the better your results will be. 100W + 3wl allows tropo range of abt 250-300mile range at all times. 4 x 5wl + 1kW will make that abt 500-600miles. Meteorscatter will have a range of 500-1300 miles. More power will make QSOing easier but not influence the distance much. Theoretical limit is abt 1500 miles which is very rare. EME means around the world. 100W + 3wl means you can work abt 5-10 stations with patience. 1kW + 4 x 5wl allows you to work almost all active EME stations and work DXCC on 2m. For more EME info look at the homepage of PA0JMV. It is interesting to see many HF folks becoming interested in VHF work. It is very different, mainly because the relatively low activity. If you put your mind (and equipment) to it, it can be very rewarding. I am an average station in Europe of abt 3-4kW ERP and have worked abt 70 DXCC without much effort including W,VE,KG6,ZS,JA. Just don't expect it to be easy, it is a definite challenge! GL! Hope to work you one day :) On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:29:02 -0700, "Rod Maupin" wrote: I'm in the Olympia, WA area. I just took the Extra test, and while I was studying I got interested in the sections on repeaters and satellite. I've worked HF for years, but never done anything else. So, my interest got piqued. Satellite sounds interesting, but I don't know anything about it. So, I am going to have to do some reading up. I don't even know how to work a repeater, so you really know I've just been into HF. Rod |
New to VHF/UHF
On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 15:29:02 -0700, "Rod Maupin"
wrote: I'm in the Olympia, WA area. I just took the Extra test, and while I was studying I got interested in the sections on repeaters and satellite. I've worked HF for years, but never done anything else. So, my interest got piqued. Satellite sounds interesting, but I don't know anything about it. for Satelites (which is a subset of VHF UHF) only the IC 910, the FT 847 and the Kenwood something like Ts-2000 are worth considering I like 847 but with New sat coming making using of 1.2GHz I would not buy one today for satelites work (i grabbed a chance to get the Boss to buy me 910H with 1.2GHZ to settle some disputed billing between him and I so I have both the 847 and 910) Kenwood has a rep for nice gear but I have found there stuff "doesn't play well others" that is it harder to find/interface no Kenwood accesories so i tend to avoid them So, I am going to have to do some reading up. I don't even know how to work a repeater, so you really know I've just been into HF. Rod _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com