RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.radiobanter.com/general/)
-   -   FCC legal question (https://www.radiobanter.com/general/100277-fcc-legal-question.html)

harvey August 1st 06 02:18 AM

FCC legal question
 
On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified:

Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring
customers?

Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with
antenna required to be recertified by law?

What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions?

Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers

richard August 1st 06 03:43 AM

FCC legal question
 

"harvey" wrote in message
...
On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified:


"Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of the
requirements set forth by the FCC.


Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring
customers?


Possibly, depending upon the type of device. What "number" specifically?


Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with
antenna required to be recertified by law?


Not if you did it yourself and have no intention of marketing it.

"Certification" or "Type acceptance" is basically used for mass marketing
letting the public know that the device does meet the minimal requirements.


What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions?

Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers





[email protected] August 1st 06 04:33 PM

FCC legal question
 

richard wrote:
"harvey" wrote in message
...
On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified:


"Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of the
requirements set forth by the FCC.
WHO GIVES A ****??

Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring
customers?


Possibly, depending upon the type of device. What "number" specifically?


Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure with
antenna required to be recertified by law?


Not if you did it yourself and have no intention of marketing it.

"Certification" or "Type acceptance" is basically used for mass marketing
letting the public know that the device does meet the minimal requirements.


What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions?

Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers



an old friend August 1st 06 05:29 PM

FCC legal question
 

wrote:
and I forgive you your false witness again


[email protected] August 1st 06 08:04 PM

FCC legal question
 
an old friend wrote:
and I

And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to
you.


harveydawabbit August 2nd 06 04:42 AM

FCC legal question
 
"richard" wrote in
:


now, do you have an answer to my question (or are you just playing
ganes-if you're a lawyer, then I can understand the word games)? more
inline:

"harvey" wrote in message
...
On wifi 2.4GHZ transceivers they require to be FCC certified:


"Certified" basically means that the device meets or exceeds all of
the requirements set forth by the FCC.


Are vendors required to supply FCC numbers by law to inquiring
customers?


Possibly, depending upon the type of device. What "number"
specifically?


FCC ID the number needed to determine IF in fact radio has been
certified. It is required to be placed visible on the radio, but are
vendors required to supply the number on request?



Are radios that have been modified such as placed in an enclosure
with antenna required to be recertified by law?


Not if you did it yourself and have no intention of marketing it.


But if a company modifies the radio including addition of high power
antenna, it has to be recertified AFAIU.



"Certification" or "Type acceptance" is basically used for mass
marketing letting the public know that the device does meet the
minimal requirements.


also used to make sure the radio meets max. power requirements as set by
the FCC.



What is the real-world policy of the FCC on the above two questions?

Thanks, in advance, for any helpful answers







an old freind August 2nd 06 04:58 PM

FCC legal question
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
and I

And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to
you.

I grant you forgiveness for your crimes


[email protected] August 3rd 06 02:41 AM

FCC legal question
 

an old freind wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
and I

And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to
you.

I grant you


Nice of you to surrender.


an old freind August 3rd 06 02:43 AM

FCC legal question
 

wrote:
an old freind wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
and I
And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to
you.

I grant you


Nice of you to surrender.

no surrender no retreat
you ran off from nimbusters I see


[email protected] August 3rd 06 02:52 AM

FCC legal question
 

an old freind wrote:
wrote:
an old friend wrote:
and I

And I see you still spam when you get your fat faggot ass handed to
you.

I grant you

You surrender to your superiors?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:22 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com