| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
cease and desist
Woger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. indeed it is amazing the way he comes up with them |
cease and desist
wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 10:32:49 -0700, N9OGL wrote: Steve the Electrical Field emission for 13 Mhz is 15,484 uV/m @ 30 Meters. Omega One Radio is running a power output 100 watts, and the electrical field emission a 17.5 meters is 2,000 uV. At 30 Meters the field emissions is 0 uV You Also have to remeber that 13 MHz is the 22 meter Shortwave Band, which does skip. It it possible to hear part 15 stations on that frequency. You can put out a higher power and produce the required electrical field. A back of the envelope calculation says you are way over the legal field strength if you're running 100 watts. You can calculate the power it takes for an isotropic radiator to produce a field strength of 15,484E-6 volts/meter as follows: 1. The area of a sphere of radius r is 4*Pi*r^2. An isotropic radiator emitting P watts at the center of the sphere will produce a power density of Pd = P / ( 4*Pi*r^2) on its surface. 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). 3. Solving (1) and (2) for the power, P, you come up with P = (er)^2 / 30. So, for an "e" of 15,484E-6 and an "r" of 30, P = 0.00719 watts, or roughly seven milliwatts. Since antennas are not isotropic, the power must be reduced even further so that the electric field will not exceed the legal limit in the direction of highest antenna gain. This calculation ignores line losses and final amplifier inefficiencies, but there's no way in Glendale you can convince me that you can take a 100 watt transmitter and manage to lose so much power that you have seven milliwatts or less being radiated. All my DeVry Correspondence School instincts tell me that you are seriously in violation of the law. Other DeVry grads at the FCC will immediately agree, as will our distinguished alumnus, KC8JBO, the only man to have discovered negative VSWR. Be careful, Todd, and rethink your current station configuration. ==================== "lean how to spell it write, moron" -- N9OGL in message .com The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually coming out of the end of the coax. The coax is a 65 feet of crappy coax I had that had been hit by lighting a few times and one piece even has holes in it. I have a Field strenght meter and at 17.5 meter I'm only getting a power reading of 2,000 uV. At 30 meters I'm getting no voltage. The thing you habe to remeber is that watts can produce different electrical fields and it's the electrical field the FCC is looking at not wattage. Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13.556.00 MHz LSB http://n9ogl.blogspot.com (OMEGA ONE RADIO BLOG) |
Cease and desist breathing, Markie
Lisping cocksucker Davey wanting to suck Roger's Woger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. Wow, Dave, it sure beat your limpdicked one. |
Cease and desist breathing, Marqueer!
an_old_fraud wrote: indeed it is amazing the way he comes up with them However it's not surprizing you can't come up with anything good, Marqueer. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
Cease and desist breathing, Markie!
|
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. Cut and pasted from another website. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. BWHAHAHAHA Saggytits cut and pastes from another website and added a few of his own words so it looks like he knows what the **** he is talking about. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Staggytits Lee whined: On 15 Aug 2006 17:08:18 -0700, Secwet Woger wrote: Hi Davey! How's that ex-streetwealker wife of yours? : : As usual, Saggytits cut and pastes from another website and adds a few : of his own words so it appears he knows what the **** he is talking : about. If you know what you are talking "aboiut," You mean like how you said one "operates" a dictionary instead of "using" one? Saggytits Lee steps on his own tiny dick when he tried to correct somebody else's English use first by saying one "operates" a dictionary instead of reading it, then uses "things" instead of "thinks" in : "Translation: Woger can't figure out how to operate a dictionary, let alone correct someone else's language.But that's not surprising from someone who things that..." "Who things that?" BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA you should be able to prove what you just said. But, of course, you can't. Sure he could, Davey. You cut and paste from other websites and add a few words do it looks like you know what the **** you are talking about. You've been caught doing that before. Like the time you tried to pass off an Alabama ARES website for the one in Wiseman's area. : This calculation ignores line losses and final amplifier inefficiencies, : but there's no way in Glendale you can convince me that you can take a : 100 watt transmitter and manage to lose so much power that you have : seven milliwatts or less being radiated. : : BWHAHAHAHA Says the know-nothing moron who claimed an Alabama ARES : website was the one for Wiseman's West Virginia local ARES. Grasp onto that desperately, Woger, You want to grasp onto Roger's "woger," we all can see that fatass. Tell us why you hide behind that fictitious negro name, fatass. Is it because you desperately want to find your real father, who is of that race? Subject: Get on the Marshall County ARES webpage...... Date: 3 Jul 2002 22:03:46 GMT From: (Stagger Lee) Organization: Houston's least reliable ISP MsgId: Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.misc References: On Wed, 3 Jul 2002 14:18:35 -0400, AB8MQ wrote: : "Bob" wrote in message : ... : and send them some of Rogers filth. I'm sure they would love it. : : Dumb****, the Marshall County ARES doesn't have a webpage, try again, Then what is at http://www.geocities.com/skywarncanwarn/ doodle brain? It sure looks like the Marshall County ARES, and it even has a place to send email. BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an_old_friend" wrote in news:1155686981.395899.190510
@75g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: wrote: cease and desist Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an_old_friend" wrote in news:1155687253.119045.45410
@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com: wrote: cease and desist Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
"an_old_friend" wrote in
oups.com: Woger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. indeed it is amazing the way he comes up with them Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Cease and desist - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 15 Aug 2006 17:09:27 -0700, wrote: wrote: nobody is that dumb except maybe wismen Let's see, Markie, you made EME contacts with bootleggers. cease and desist http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Cease and desist breathing, Markie - Mark, Just ignore them.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
oups.com: Lisping cocksucker Davey wanting to suck Roger's Woger wrote: wrote in message ups.com... an_old_fraud wrote: cease and desist Go suck your daddy's cock, Markie. Or is that what your shemale wife is doing while you are online? + Wow, Not Roger. You certainly are without peers when it comes to responses. Wow, Dave, it sure beat your limpdicked one. Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
Cease and desist breathing, Marqueer! - Mark, Just ignore them.
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
ups.com: an_old_fraud wrote: indeed it is amazing the way he comes up with them However it's not surprizing you can't come up with anything good, Marqueer. Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
On 15 Aug 2006 17:08:18 -0700, Secwet Woger wrote:
: : As usual, Saggytits cut and pastes from another website and adds a few : of his own words so it appears he knows what the **** he is talking : aboiut. If you know what you are talking "aboiut," you should be able to prove what you just said. But, of course, you can't. : This calculation ignores line losses and final amplifier inefficiencies, : but there's no way in Glendale you can convince me that you can take a : 100 watt transmitter and manage to lose so much power that you have : seven milliwatts or less being radiated. : : BWHAHAHAHA Says the know-nothing moron who claimed an Alabama ARES : website was the one for Wiseman's West Virginia local ARES. Grasp onto that desperately, Woger, as you try to change the subject yet another time. Say: While we're on the subject of ARES, did you go to the last meeting as Dave Heil requested? I'll bet you didn't, even though you would have been invited to give another talk on negative SWR. There's always the next time, Woger. You can give a talk on r.m.s. voltage instead. ==================== In message XLSKB3LR38448.4326273148@anonymous, Secwet Woger dazzled his readers with his logic skills by saying: "The fact is you still can't disprove I've never been to your workplace." ==================== In message , Secwet Woger bragged about his Extra Class examination fame with the claim: "If poor chronic alcoholic and drug abuser Gopher face wouldn't drink so much because he is womanless, he could spell 'retested', 'dumb' and 'Rogie' and could actually pass an Extra license exam." ==================== In message .com, Secwet Woger incorrectly corrected someone else with "Too bad you can't even spell non sequitor correctly, though." ==================== "Yes, one can always tell a cowardly CHICKEN**** when he hides behind anonymity." -- KC8JBO in message ==================== "Roger's background does have International affairs in it. Too bad." -- International man of mystery, Secwet Woger, in message .com "aboiut". Well, it's about "tiome". "equivilent" Equi.what? "Jealoius". Jelly? What? "Sodmy". "C'mon over and you can sodmy yard". Dave Heil. "Somebosy". Tech school talk? "proive" The proife is in the pudding? "moutgh" Rog has a moutgh full. "spens". Do you spend it or spin it? "Certailny: Woger is certailny stupid. "Iliterate" What's an L here and there? "entiorely" West Virginia phonics again. "apoloigize" Only in Woger's warped mind. "wiuth" Wiuth what?? "exaggerarte" Good one. "eteranl" As in forever? "ionly" Ions? Lonely? Who knows? "expossed" Still no spell check. "workibg" As in working? "assulted" Darned typos! "Georgaphy." Georgia on his mind? "remibndded" It is hard to talk with your mouth full. "corrpuption" Is that a dog? "molsetred" Only 2Test knows. "Whinyng". What? "Plagairizing". Geesh "emnpty" The inside of Roger's head. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote:
[snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe PJ |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. I would really suggest you read the FCC Office of Engineering and technology bulletin on PART 15, it OET Bulletin 63 http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf expecially page 29 which states: What is the relationship between "microvolts per meter" and Watts? Watts are the units used to describe the amount of power generated by a transmitter. Microvolts per meter (µV/m) are the units used to describe the strength of an electric field created by the operation of a transmitter. A particular transmitter that generates a constant level of power (Watts) can produce electric fields of different strengths (µV/m) depending on, among other things, the type of transmission line and antenna connected to it. Because it is the electric field that causes interference to authorized radio communications, and since a particular electric field strength does not directly correspond to a particular level of transmitter power, most of the Part 15 emission limits are specified in field strength. So logically if you use a ineffecient antenna and ****ty coax then you can create a low enough field....I'm tell you right now, I Have a field strength meter that reads microvolts, and I check the field ever morning, at it's not at no 30 meters either, it's around 17.5 meters and the electrical field is 1,0000 uV ...So believe what the hell you want I check it every morning and it's 1,000 uV @17.5 meters and at 30 meters it's 0. I would also point out I come from a long line of electricians (my father, my grandfather and my great grandfather) and THEY will back me up. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
In article ,
patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe No this is what our educational system does to EE's. PCB layout and CAD work will bring them back to reality. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Lisping Lloyd Davies who desperately wants to suck Roger's Woger wrote: IKYABWAI Yet you wrote: "breaddead" - LLoyd hasn't got anything upstairs in the oven "defenseive" - Lardass is "defensive" of his ignorance "counter-offenseive" - When LARDASS LLoyds attack "nights" - Athens ASSHOLE was referring to last "night's" masturbation session "I forget to set the playlist in Winamp to repeat!" - Mongolloyd also "forgets" the use of past tense, maybe he forgot! "Techincal" - Lloyd just hates those "technical" things "Dalkes" - Lloyd's granddad remembers when movies became "talkies" too bad LARDASS learned to Dalk sic "That it!" - When Mongolloyds get real mad, they talk like Tor Johnson "Woger" - LARDASS closely identifies with Elmer Fudd with his lack of hair and all "decide on weather or not" - It's always "stormy weather" with Lloyd deciding "whether" or not to use correct English "can not" - Mongolloyd is wondering how he "cannot" seem to get ahead in life "is'nt" - "Isn't" LARDASS cute when he is mad? "PAINFULL" - How LARDASS' bathroom scale feels when he steps on it in the morning, real "painful" "I wish for Roger Wisemand" - Lloyd liked thosed thingd ford Rogerd "alot" - Davies dreams he can communicate in English a lot "thier" - Lavender Lloyd sure does lisp after a night behind the dumpster "dont" - Lloyd says "dont", the rest of the world says "don't" "Isreal" - Is FATASS Lloyd's retardation for real, or can he blame Israel? "juist jelous" "extermenate" - A three for one post Athens Asshole axiom "footting" - What LARDASS doesn't have, an equal "footing" anywhere "Cant" - Emmanuel? "th" - When Lloyd gets nervous, he stutte, er stutters "enfighting" - Lloyd's two brain cells are infighting for control of his stupidity "YOU STUPID JEW!" - Wasn't Jesus Jewish, so called Christian LLoyd? "Tonite" - There's nothing in Lloyd's brain "tonight" or any night "segmant" - What Lloyd's communications are, only sentence "segments" "I just listening" - Too bad he doesn't listen to his poor English "buffon" - The Athens, Alabama "buffoon" strikes again! "museium" - Where LARDASS LLoyd keeps his "muse" "nastey" - How everybody describes LARDASS' body stench, especially in the ghetto "loose" - Lloyd's description of his spinchter muscles... "wont" - Lloyd refuses to learn English, it's Lloyd's "wont" "awhile" - It will be "a while" before Davies gets a clue "freinds" - Lloyd's conglomeration of "friends" and "fiends" "thier" - "There" just isn't any hope for LARDASS Lloyd "ill-educated" Davies "backstabers" - Lloyd's version of the OJays' hit "becuase" - Home of the "Deliverance Extras" spelling by LARDASS Lloyd "obselete" - What LARDASS thinking is to him, others see it as 'obsolete'..... "belive" - What fools like LARDASS Lloyd "believes" "thier" - Ill-educated Xtian LARDASS Lloyd shows off his language skills! "marshalls" - Mongolloyd spell "marshals" real good! Wisemand - LARDASSd ****sd upd againd "compay" - Mongolloyd never gets any female "compay," while others do get "company" " But when we are winning," DUMB****, YOU have NEVER WON anything in your miserable life! "and do the nasty!" You don't really know what that means, do you, 30 year old VIRGIN? "It's does" - Mongolloyd use good English "momnet" - LARDASS Lloyd Davies misses his dead "momnet" for a "moment" "seriuosly" - Lavender Lad President Mongolloyd wants to be taken "seriously" instead of "seriuosly" "annouced" - Mongolloyd "announces" his stupidity again "tonite" - Davies never lets his lack of education stop him from announcing to the world he's a ****ing imbecile! "nite" - When LARDASS Lloyd molests those kids he makes them say "nite, nite" at "night" "weldare" - Calling Dr. Weldare, LARDASS needs his head out of his FATASS....put it on his welfare bill "so **** of" - When Mongolloyds who have man tits talk tough...... "fukcing funney" - Alabama deliverance extra Davies speak "pictrue" - "Picture" yourself as a Davies Mongolloyd "isseus" - Davies has "issues" too many to list here "resortjng" - Is Lloyd from Finland? "attsxks" - When LARDASS Davies "attacks" he uses illiteracy "basturds"- What mental illness patient LARDASS Lloyd calls his nurses "shkt" - Mongolloyd Davies' "Skittles", he likes that "Hershey rainbow" "law suit" - LARDASS never leaves his HUD apartment with out his law suit "opinionn" - When LARDASSn postsn whiln drunkn "intrenet harrasssmint" - Tries to make LARDASS Lloyd's rotting teeth feel fresh "sneeky" - The teachers always "sneaked" Lloyd through the next grade "that' wasnet" - LLoyd was out that year of school that they went over English grammar idiout! - "Lloyid" sic strikes out again! "speling" - Mongolloyd Davies the "spelling" bee champ of the retards! "reas isseus instaed" - Davies talking out of that cheap beer again "atttacking" - LARDASS Lloyd stutters when he gets upset.....ttttt..... "challegne" - When Mongolloyds drink and post "metnal" - Mongolloyd just doesn't have the "mental" ability to debate...... "debste" - What Lloyd's mommy did to him in the bathtub "cahllenge" - Mongolloyd speak for "call" and "challenge" "basturds" - LLoyd ,Amanda's illegitimate "*******" sure does have a scat fetish "morsd" - Whend Daviesd drinkd andd postd "wont" - It is Mongolloyd's "wont" to be stupid, "won't " you let him? "youd" - Oops, LARDASS did it again! "poinion" - Must be an Athens Alabama "Deliverance" thing "Woger Wiseman"- LARDASS Lloyd's got that cocksucker's lisp "isnt" - "Isn't" LARDASS cute when he slobbers? "worfh" - Davies' cocksucking lisp has returned "waset of spaceda" - When Lloyd's only friend Colt 45 malt liquor kicks in "Oppulant" - The only thing "opulent" in LARDASS is that he is rich in ignorance |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ups.com... patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage. Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in his area. Herb |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Herb wrote: "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ups.com... patrick jankowiak wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: [snip] 2. The power density is related to the electric field and the impedance of free space (120*Pi) by the formula Pd = e^2 / (120*Pi). [snip] Thanks for the reminder on the calculations. Funny but a couple of my younger colleagues who think themselves quite the electronics men still do not think 'space' has an impedance. There is nothing there, after all.. That is what too much PCB layout/CAD work wioll do to one. hehe Too Bad Saggytits had to cut and paste the "calculations", he didn't know them himself. The only space Saggytits knows about is the one between his dumbo ears. That is why we always register for Pwofessow Woger's classes on negative VSWR and especially his classes on RMS voltage. Yet he didn't have to cut and paste from another website and add a few comments so it looks like he wrote the whole thing like you did. Tell us again how Eric Clapton wrote "Layla" for your ex streetwalker wife instead of George Harrison's wife, stupid. Pwofessow Woger has perfect attendance at ARES meetings in his area. So do you hiding behind your hideous ex streetwalker wife, lisping Davey. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
On 16 Aug 2006 19:40:03 -0700, N9OGL wrote:
: : I would really suggest you read the FCC Office of Engineering and : technology bulletin on PART 15, it OET Bulletin 63 : http://www.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineeri...3/oet63rev.pdf : expecially page 29 which states: : : : What is the relationship between "microvolts per meter" and Watts? : : Watts are the units used to describe the amount of power generated by a : transmitter. Microvolts per meter (µV/m) are the units used to : describe the strength of an electric field created by the operation of : a transmitter. A particular transmitter that generates a constant level : of power (Watts) can produce electric fields of different strengths : (µV/m) depending on, among other things, the type of transmission line : and antenna [snip] Todd, there isn't a law you can quote which governs physics. You can't repeal the law of gravity, and you can't logically state that transmitter power and electric field strength are independent of one another. Think about it: That idea doesn't even make sense. : So logically if you use a ineffecient antenna and ****ty coax then you : can create a low enough field....I'm tell you right now, I Have a field : strength meter that reads microvolts, and I check the field ever : morning, at it's not at no 30 meters either, it's around 17.5 meters Do you know the difference between the far and near fields? Are you aware that an ordinary field strength meter can give you wildly incorrect results when it is placed in the near field of an antenna? Most engineers would tell you that you have to be at least five wavelengths away from the antenna (and preferably ten) before you are out of the influence of the near field. At 33 MHz, the wavelength is roughly nine meters; therefore, your meter is in the near field of the antenna, and all bets are off. : and the electrical field is 1,0000 uV ...So believe what the hell you : want I check it every morning and it's 1,000 uV @17.5 meters and at 30 : meters it's 0. I would also point out I come from a long line of : electricians (my father, my grandfather and my great grandfather) and : THEY will back me up. Sigh. That's what we need: Electricians who never even heard of free space impedance. ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV
10. Someone asks, "What died in here?" and you show them 9. Dust on TV screen gives everybody comical Andy Rooney eyebrows 8. When the FCC mobile lab pulls up in front of your house, Riley Hollingsworth refuses to get out of the van 7. The so-called "Dust Bunnies" have sharp, snapping teeth 6. Your house gets hit by a twister and it actually looks better 5. Guests take one look at your bathroom and decide to use the backyard 4. When someone from the health department rings your doorbell, you say, "Not again!" 3. Every time you turn on a faucet, you hear a muffled barking sound 2. Even Mark Morgan refuses to sleep on your floor 1. You've been receiving death threats from Mr. Clean |
Cease desist and grow up
|
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT using a Isotropic radiator. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke their licensing and waiver system is!! Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13556.00 MHz LSB ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
N9OGL wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT using a Isotropic radiator. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke their licensing and waiver system is!! sorry Tood there you are worng you will not throw the bullitin in anyone face why? because NObody will show up to get hit with it The FCC for it faults knows Know that a lot of are full of it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13556.00 MHz LSB ==================== God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and then there was light. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
an old friend wrote: N9OGL wrote: Stagger Lee wrote: On 15 Aug 2006 19:40:07 -0700, N9OGL wrote: The power in wattage and the electrical field are not related because a power output in wattage can produce different fields depending on lengh of coax, antenna, antenna height...and your friends in the Office of You can't get around physics, Todd. The power density is directly related to the electric field through an Ohm's law type of relationship, expressed as the square of the r.m.s value of e, divided by the impedance of free space. Once you know the power density, it is a matter of summing that power density over the radiation pattern of the antenna to figure out the total radiated power. Therefore, there *is* a relationship between radiated power and field strength. In the case of an isotropic radiator, the relationship between radiated power and field strength is easy to calculate, and it provides one with a limiting case which can act as a guideline. I know it, you know it...tell it to the FCC beacuse THEIR the ones saying there isn't . I would right now like to point out that I'm NOT using a Isotropic radiator. engineering and technology at the FCC will tell you that. The antenna I'm using is a very imefficient antenna, in fact the signal is acually I'm not interested in your rationalizations, Todd, because I'm not the one who is at risk. In this real world, your power output is about five orders of magnitude larger than the power theoretically needed to produce the maximum allowed electric field. To me, that would be a cause for great concern. If you want to risk an FCC enforcement action against you, be my guest. Again it's NOT my rational it's the FCC's but like I told Stebie the HAM and Internet COP if you have a problem with it, go bitch to The FCC and I'll throw their little bulletin both in theirs and the judges face, along with a few other things.. including how much of sick joke their licensing and waiver system is!! sorry Tood there you are worng you will not throw the bullitin in anyone face why? because NObody will show up to get hit with it The FCC for it faults knows Know that a lot of are full of it Todd N9OGL OMEGA ONE RADIO 13556.00 MHz LSB That's how they have lied all these years about the waivering process, they go to the courts saying one thing, then turn around and do another. Same thing here, they publish bulletins saying one thing and then go after people who's following the same rules, claiming something different. If they want to complain about the station they can file the complaint here http://www.fcc.gov/eb/sed/ulo.html Complaints Written complaints alleging violations of Section 301 of the Communications Act should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Complaints should include the name of the operator, if known, how the station identifies itself, the location of the station, the operating frequency, the type of station being operated, and whether the station's operation is causing interference. For complaints involving unlicensed amateur radio operations, please click here. For complaints involving unlicensed broadcast station operations, please click here. But I will fight it ever step of the way, I would like them (the FCC) to explain to the judge why they didn't consider my Seven (7) broadcast applications and Waivers?? So all I ahve to tell stebie and his butt buddies go for it!!! |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
N9OGL wrote:
an old friend wrote: N9OGL wrote: That's how they have lied all these years about the waivering process, they go to the courts saying one thing, then turn around and do another. Same thing here, they publish bulletins saying one thing and then go after people who's following the same rules, claiming something different. If they want to complain about the station they can file the complaint here http://www.fcc.gov/eb/sed/ulo.html Complaints Written complaints alleging violations of Section 301 of the Communications Act should be sent to the Federal Communications Commission, Enforcement Bureau, Spectrum Enforcement Division, 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554. Complaints should include the name of the operator, if known, how the station identifies itself, the location of the station, the operating frequency, the type of station being operated, and whether the station's operation is causing interference. For complaints involving unlicensed amateur radio operations, please click here. For complaints involving unlicensed broadcast station operations, please click here. But I will fight it ever step of the way, I would like them (the FCC) to explain to the judge why they didn't consider my Seven (7) broadcast applications and Waivers?? So all I ahve to tell stebie and his butt buddies go for it!!! it will never happen the FCC will never strike iup on the wod of Hams esp one with hisory of harassment like wismen and Robeson I comend you on your stand |
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste!
Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. |
Cease breathing, Markie!
an old fraud wrote: Cease Cease spreading your AIDS to little children. |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
an old fraud wrote: it will never happen the FCC will never strike iup on the wod of Hams esp one with hisory of harassment like wismen and Robeson I comend you on your stand No, the FCC is about to levy a fine on you for talking to unlicensed stations, Marqueer. |
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste!
"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in message ps.com... Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. / More witty one-liners from Woger. He sure is original, ain't he? |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit
|
Saggytits Lee plagiarizes in another cut and paste! - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 18 Aug 2006 05:33:10 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote: Saggytits Lee wrote: Top Ten Signs Your Home is in Glendale, WV More cut and paste plagiarism from Saggytits! Poor Saggytits, his ex-streetwalker Finnish wife will soon henpeckhim to get off the computer and videotape her performing cunnilingus on the family dog. cease desists and grow up http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
N9OGL: Exceeding the Part 15 EM limitation for fun and profit - Mark, Just ignore them.
wrote in :
On 16 Aug 2006 12:26:45 -0700, wrote: Cease desist and grow up http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ Mark, Just ignore them. They only tease you because of the stupid things you say when you follow up. Just ignore them and they'll give up. Stop giving them reasons to tease you. It only makes you look more stupid. Take a break from the radio groups for a while, Maybe work on your moon bounce some more. SC |
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY!...AND THEY'RE RIGHT!
SeeingEyeDog wrote: Personal attacks when reason can not be comprehended. Another symptom of Neo-Liberalism disease. Funny, but I've always perceived that characteristic as being the leading symptom of Neo-Conservatism.... And what is 'neo-liberalism'? I don't know what that is supposed to mean. I'm interested, please elaborate. |
HAMS ACCUSE SMEGMA ONE OF PIRACY! WELL...THEY'RE RIGHT!
wrote: On 10 Aug 2006 03:08:24 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote: N9OGL wrote: from Omega One Radio Blog (http://n9ogl.brownspot.in.my.short.com) HAMS ACCUSE SMEGMA ONE OF PIRACY! So what? You flagrantly violate federal laws left and right and then get in a twist when you get your nose rubbed in it, PutzBoy! no evidence to that effet Sure there's "evidence to that effet", Morkie. First off there's his numerous posts bragging about his violations, then there's the photographs that HE had on his website...(The illiegally modified HiMax...I have it copied to disc...He took it off his site when I busted his chops about it...Too bad for him it's archived now) Take your snivvelling rants to Confession on Sunday...Maybe then you'll find someone who gives a rat's kazoo about your "allegations". why? Because that's the only place Toiddie's likely to find a sympatheic audience. They have a special compassion for people like him. No one here believes that you're only running LEGAL anything, Toiddie. definately lying there steve I do I believe that Tood is rmost likely with the limits of the rules Nice snip, fatboy...I caveated you...But then you're hardly any kind of an authority on ANY technical subject other than "bisexaul" matters. Steve, K4YZ |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com