Let's take back ham radio!
 

wrote in message
...
On Sun, 27 Aug 2006 17:57:46 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote:


"an old freind" wrote in message
roups.com...

get help wrote:
On 27 Aug 2006 13:37:53 -0700, a welfare ham
wrote:

in a time where numbers are declining but that does not maater to al
since the No Code techs are not hams anyway according to AL

Indeed I'm am
yup, im a poor forger
www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com

--
Mark caught forging using Steve's name.
"Steve's" post has headers:

X-Complaints-To:
X-Submitted-By: 66.82.9.42

Your reply contains headers:

NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.82.9.42
Injection-Info: 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.82.9.42

'Nuff said.

Let's take back ham radio!
 

Not Lloyd wrote:

yup, im a poor forger
www.marksspamblog.blogspot.com
yes you are a poor forger

Let's take back ham radio!
 

wrote:

BWHAHAHAHA Fatass Markie admits Wiseman is right!
meltdown in progress

Let's take back ham radio!
 

an old freindless fat faggot wrote:
wrote:

BWHAHAHAHA Fatass Markie admits Wiseman is right!
me

You arfe the one who posted it, dumbass.

Let's take back ham radio!
 

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
an old freindless fat faggot wrote:
wrote:

BWHAHAHAHA Fatass Markie admits Wiseman is right!
me

You are the one who posted it, dumbass.

typo fixed.

Let's take back ham radio!
 

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
an old freindless fat faggot wrote:

You arfe the one who posted it, dumbass.
posted what?

Let's take back ham radio!
 

an old fraud wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
an old freindless fat faggot wrote:

You are the one who posted it, dumbass.
posted what?

That "Wisemen" was right about you being not a good forger. Learn to
read, stupid.