Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?
 

wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:


Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Scheissman just wants to blame others for his jamming episodes a few
years back when he was running 20 meters and trying albeit weakly to jam
some people on 14.275, 3.950, 14.313 and other frequencies

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?
 

"Billy Smith" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:


Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


You claiming your boasts of EME were done via CW? Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?
 

Billy Smith wrote:
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:


Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?
 

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

wrote:


On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:



Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?


Interesting that you received letters about it. Would you like us to
repost them again? Just like you were jamming 14.313.

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?
 

Billy Smith wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

wrote:


On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:



Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?


Interesting that you received letters about it. Would you like us to
repost them again?

Repost them all you want. Thay don't prove Roger was jamming. He never
got any fines nor was his license suspended.

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules. The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.

Just like you were jamming 14.313.

Wrong again, dumb****. You can't read can you?

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

woger: kook on parade
 

Not Lloyd wrote:
"Billy Smith" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:


Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


You claiming your boasts of EME were done via CW?
nope I never made such a claim

they were done via JT65B, a digital mode, not voice not CW

Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

nope you can't get it right

Anyone ever hear AB8MQ on the radio?
 

Like anyone here believes your story, right 2 TEST? They don't make
people retest unless they have violated the rules and shown they aren't
responsible with their privleges. I've been an amateur radio operator
for years and can tell you that I've never received a letter much less
anything less than complimentary about my station. You on the other hand
show what a filthy loser you are every time you key the mike.



Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:


Billy Smith wrote:


wrote:



On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:




Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?


Interesting that you received letters about it. Would you like us to
repost them again?


Repost them all you want. Thay don't prove Roger was jamming. He never
got any fines nor was his license suspended.

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules. The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.


Just like you were jamming 14.313.


Wrong again, dumb****. You can't read can you?

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

Markie liar and kook on parade
 

an old fraud wrote:
Not Lloyd wrote:
"Billy Smith" wrote in message
ink.net...
wrote:

On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:


Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


You claiming your boasts of EME were done via CW?
nope I never made such a claim

they were done via JT65B, a digital mode, not voice not CW


No, you lied and talked to unlicensed stations.

Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

nope you can't get it right

You admitted it on here, dumb****.

Anyone ever hear "Billy Smith" aka N9OGL QRM on the radio?
 

Billy Smith whined:
Like anyone here believes your story, right 2 TEST? They don't make
people retest unless they have violated the rules and shown they aren't
responsible with their privleges.

You can't read, can you, Toad? You'll be getting a big NAL soon enough.
You haven't been a ham radio operator at all, Toad, you are just a
wannabe. You had to take your tests a few times before you could even
pass them. You only have the beginner's training wheel license because
you can't pass the morse code\ like Markie, either. Wiseman passed his
twice, (which was 6 years ago, you sure couldn't retake yours and pass
them) and upgraded. So much for those "sanctions" if that's what they
are. How is it Wiseman never had his license suspended or revoked? You
can't sem to answer that one, you just make more excuses.

The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.

Now cry a river, ****.



Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:


Billy Smith wrote:


wrote:



On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:




Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?


Interesting that you received letters about it. Would you like us to
repost them again?


Repost them all you want. Thay don't prove Roger was jamming. He never
got any fines nor was his license suspended.

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules. The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.


Just like you were jamming 14.313.


Wrong again, dumb****. You can't read can you?

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.

woger: kook on parade
 

wrote:
an old fraud wrote:

they were done via JT65B, a digital mode, not voice not CW


No, you lied and talked to unlicensed stations.
nope

Oh, wait, you DID use
voice, but you were conversing with low power, unconfirmed stations....

nope you can't get it right

You admitted it on here, dumb****.
no woger

learn to read if it is not too late

woger: kook on parade

Anyone ever hear "Billy Smith" aka N9OGL QRM on the radio?
 

wrote:

Billy Smith whined:

Like anyone here believes your story, right 2 TEST? They don't make
people retest unless they have violated the rules and shown they aren't
responsible with their privleges.


You can't read, can you, Toad? You'll be getting a big NAL soon enough.
You haven't been a ham radio operator at all, Toad, you are just a
wannabe. You had to take your tests a few times before you could even
pass them. You only have the beginner's training wheel license because
you can't pass the morse code\ like Markie, either. Wiseman passed his
twice, (which was 6 years ago, you sure couldn't retake yours and pass
them) and upgraded. So much for those "sanctions" if that's what they
are. How is it Wiseman never had his license suspended or revoked? You
can't sem to answer that one, you just make more excuses.

The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.

Now cry a river, ****.



Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:


Billy Smith wrote:


Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:



Billy Smith wrote:



wrote:




On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 01:39:05 +0000 (UTC), get help
wrote:





Sounds just like you, Mark.

realy and how time have I ever gone on voice?

I rarely do
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/



Hey, Lardass, why did the FCC recently DF you on 20 meters?


Interesting that you received letters about it. Would you like us to
repost them again?


Repost them all you want. Thay don't prove Roger was jamming. He never
got any fines nor was his license suspended.

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules. The FCC has the authority, pursuant to §97.519(d)(2) of the
rules to readminister any examination element previously administered
by a volunteer examiner.



Just like you were jamming 14.313.


Wrong again, dumb****. You can't read can you?

NOTE: Issuance by the FCC of a Warning Notice indicates that the FCC
has what it believes to be reliable evidence of possible rules
infractions and not necessarily that the recipient has violated FCC
rules.



The facts are moron that you don't generally get retested unless you
violate the rules. Of which you got busted doing that? Just can't face
the facts, now can you momma's boy. Tell us why did Riley send you those
letters and expected you to retest. If that was the case, he would have
never bothered you in first place.

Again, you're not intellectually talented enough to pull of any sort of
lie like that because everyone sees through you, Scheissman. One lie
covers another lie for you, now doesn't it mommas boy? They do have the
jurisdiction to test you again and as with all licensees. That is fact.
However, they don't randomly come out and retest people for whatever
they would like unless you don't seem to understand the rules.

Which you don't understand the rules against filth, jamming, or anything
else. You are an embarassment to the amateur radio service and you
always will be. Just like the pimply faced social pariah you are, you
are a disgrace to the Amateur Radio Service. You provide nothing to the
service and never have other than to be a user. Which would explain the
actions toward your adopted mother.

Your record speaks for itself, not only on rec.radio.amateur.misc but
elsewhere on the amateur bands. Interestingly, you were also cited for a
personal dispute that you dragged onto the amateur bands with another
licensee from your area. It seems that you can't understand the basis
and purpose for amateur radio.

Which explains why you are not on the air very much, because too many
people are waiting for you to committ another of your offenses so they
can tape your stupidities and forward them to the FCC. You really should
have your license revoked and with your past you finally find a way to
screw up again in the future. Let the tape recorders roll.

woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm
 

wrote:

woger: lying kook on parade
http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm
stop lying

lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/­mipsor/default.htm
 

wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wo

Stop spamming, child molester.

lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm
stop lying and there will be no need to answer your charge

woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/­mipsor/default.htm
 

wrote:

..woger try http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm
where the state of Michigan makes clear I am not