Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #31   Report Post  
Old October 5th 06, 02:38 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,303
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?


Billy Smith wrote:
Mark C. Morgan wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Billy cumgobbler Smith wrote:


an old friend wrote:


Indy Ham wrote:


Woger needs his ass kicked is the problem. It almost happened at Dayton 3 or
4 years ago. Remember Woger? You ran and got the police. I remember....


No, Roachdale ****tard, you must be thinking about yourself.



woger has showed at a ham fest I am shocked but sadly what woger realy
needs is euthenizing


Roger has never been to Dayton hamfest, retard.


Still writing IKYABWAI



Still hiding, coward? Your Pee Wee herman impersonation sucks, just
like your sister.


You don't have to imprersonate Pee Wee Herman because


Because you're doing quite well on your own, you utterly clueless
****tard.


  #33   Report Post  
Old October 5th 06, 02:41 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,303
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?


wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006 05:46:38 -0700, "Mark C. Morgan"
wrote:


stfu you know im a child molestor woger


You sure are, Marqueer!

  #34   Report Post  
Old October 6th 06, 08:33 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 418
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical todayas they were 25 Years ago?

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Mark C. Morgan wrote:


wrote:


get flsuhed clean up ham radio


Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard?


Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass?



No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there.
BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system
to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure
backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a
"sanction," is it?


I've been a ham for years and never had to retest. 99.9 percent of the
rest of the amateur community has never had to retest. The only people
that retest are rules breakers and those who may have fraudulently
received a license courtesy of a VE team. They don't just make one
retest on basis that they can but it takes some pretty stupid actions to
do so. That is right though, you do have that level of stupidity to
require retesting. I think the commission should revoke your license due
to character qualifications. They can and have done that in the past.
  #35   Report Post  
Old October 6th 06, 12:39 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,303
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?


Billy Smith wrote:
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

Billy Smith wrote:

Mark C. Morgan wrote:


wrote:


get flsuhed clean up ham radio


Talk to any unlicensed stations lately, ****tard?


Have you been jamming 20 meters lately, dumbass?



No, But I hear you jamming and making unidentified transmissions there.
BTW, clueless, the FCC can require any ham tested under the VE system
to retest. They don't have to give a reason. In Roger's case, it sure
backfired because he passed them and even upgraded. It's not much of a
"sanction," is it?


I've been a ham for years lies and misinformation, what else can you expect from silly Billy


Liar. You don't even have the beginner's training wheel no code tech
license. You couldn't pass any of the tests or the code. The FCC can
retest anybody under the VE system. what part of that can't you
understand, stupid? The FCC has the authority, pursuant to
97.519(d)(2) of the rules to readminister any examination element
previously administered by a volunteer examiner.



  #36   Report Post  
Old October 6th 06, 12:40 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,303
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical today as they were 25 Years ago?


wrote:

get

Get to dying of yourAIDS, you child molesting son of a bitch!

  #37   Report Post  
Old October 7th 06, 06:22 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 751
Default Do you think discussions on repeaters are as technical todayas they were 25 Years ago?

Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:

Liar. You don't even have the beginner's training wheel no code tech
license. You couldn't pass any of the tests or the code.


This from the guy who brought us the Morse message: "QUCKOC."

You're a regular whiz at Morse, UnWiseman.

Dave K8MN


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
These groups used to be great forums for technical and policy discussions. Sad General 26 May 31st 06 05:03 PM
These groups used to be great forums for technical and policy discussions. Sad Policy 29 May 31st 06 05:03 PM
These groups used to be great forums for technical and policy discussions. CW CB 18 May 31st 06 05:03 PM
Imax ground plane question Vinnie S. CB 151 April 15th 05 05:21 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2019 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017