Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

Cecil Moore wrote:
Dave wrote:
NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!

So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com
the procoders are more interested in their idleogy than lives always
have been it seems

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote:

wrote:

On 27 Sep 2006 04:39:17 -0700, "Not Cocksucker Lloyd"
wrote:


wrote:

On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:15:47 GMT, "James Philopena"
wrote:


I'm relatively new to the group, but I can already tell you're the group
troll.

Having been active in the rec.photo groups for sometime, I understand
trolls, but at least you have a beef with something tangible.

Let's face it. You most likely are one of those who got their General at 13
WPM, maybe their Extra at 20 and hate the no coders and those who got their
license by only taking code at 5WPM. Well, who cares. It's time for you to
accept reality and come to the conclusion, you out lived Morse Code. Get on
with life.

while he refuses to give his call he claims to a 20 wpm extra

He claims to be intelligent like you do, too, Markie, Factual evidence
shows that to be contrary.

lying agin Woger he has made no such claim you always lie woger


You just proved you aren't intelligent, once again, Markie.


You proved that you aren't intelligent many years ago.

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

Cecil Moore wrote:

Dave wrote:

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz of the
HF bands.

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

Dave wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote:
So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz
of the HF bands.

Telephony has saved magnitudes more lives than CW.
If you are CW only, you are not properly equipped
to even attempt to save lives.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

"Dave" wrote in message
...
Cecil Moore wrote:

Dave wrote:

NO! I can't have a QSO with a no-code ham.
They can't copy CW!!! So, No QSO!


So you wouldn't respond to a Mayday and save a life?
Nice guy.

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25 KHz
of the HF bands.


Hmmmmmm - my how we belabor a point. MAYDAY IN CW = SOS............ SOS is
usually sent in those cases. SOS for the CW and Mayday for radiotelephone.
MAYDAY is "also" asked about in some RadioTelephone license exams for
"marine" use and is even becoming part of the Fire service. There is a test
specifically for "Mayday" and its uses. Mayday is "generally" used in
"airplane" emergencies.

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

wrote:

SNIPPED

then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for
the good of the ars
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


Oh! I do disagree!

I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier, ANC-4 noise
canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450 Amplifier, G-707
[2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating table.

IC-706 MKIIg & AH-4 in the mobile. Plus 2 HTs.

Antennas include a LP, CF Doublet with tuned feeders, 30 meter vertical, 60
meter vertical, and a 2/440 vertical at 300 feet above average terrain. [I use
two different Murch UT-2000A roller inductor tuners for HF and Doublet operation.]

I still claim I won't hear a 'Mayday' in the Extra CW sub-bands.

I earned a BSEE, have completed numerous post BSEE courses [work specialized],
not degree bearing, served as Program Chief Engineer on a very major USAF
strategic missile, and have over 50 years of Ham experience including more than
10 years in RACES and AREC and 20+ years in USAF MARS where I served as Region
Communications Manager-AFF1C.

I passed my CW requirements in front of a US Government FCC engineer in the
early 1950s.

Finally, I know enough not to broadcast this over five different NGs.

/s/ DD

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

wrote:

SNIPPED

then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25
khz


http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

NOPE!!

3500 - 3525
7000 - 7025
10.1 - 10.15
14.0 - 14.025
18.068 - 18.110
21.000 - 21.025

That is where they run. That's a fact you can't deny. They have capability that
exceeds my requirements, but that is where they run.

And you still crossed posted to more than r.r.a.m. When are you going to learn?

You don't want to invest time and energy in learning code and YOU STILL CAN'T
FIGURE OUT HOW TO POST TO ONE GROUP.

How does your cross posting ignorance contribute to r.r.a.a?
How does your cross posting ignorance contribute to r.r.a.b?
How does your cross posting ignorance contribute to r.r.a.p?
How does your cross posting prejudice contribute to r.r.s?

We know how your prejudice contributes to r.r.a.m

/s/ DD

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

Dave wrote:
wrote:

SNIPPED

then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25
khz


http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

NOPE!!
stop lying

If two no-code hams contact each other on CB, is that a real QSO?
 

Is a contact with a no-code ham a real QSO?
 

wrote in :

How does one say mayday on CW? My radio only works on the bottom 25
KHz of the HF bands.
then you are a porrly equiped ham and should turn your license in for
the good of the ars
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/
I am fairly well equipped: IC-756 Pro III, IC-746, AL-80B amplifier,
ANC-4 noise
canceller, MFJ 1025 Signal enhancer, TS-570D, AMP SUPPLY LK-450
Amplifier, G-707
[2 & 440], plus computer ... and these are the things on my operating
table.


IC-706 MKIIg & AH-4 in the mobile. Plus 2 HTs.
then you are a lying in claiming your radio only work on the bottom 25
khz


WOW Mark,

And you're not even a Real ham.

SC