|
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
I might propose that to the FCC.
20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. Dee, N8UZE |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Dee Flint wrote:
"Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. Hocky Puck. Well, that's putting it mildly. From a 20wpm Extra. Not really. "Slow Code" does not use his real name or call here. He's obviously looking for a reaction - aka trolling. He could be anybody. He could be Len Anderson, Brian Burke, Mark Morgan or someone else like Vshah101 or Cutie Boy. The fact that he says he's a 20 wpm Extra doesn't mean he (or she) is. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
|
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE UZE is what drips from your box, tramp! |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
On 19 Oct 2006 18:00:48 -0700, "I PUNCE" wrote:
Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! wow looks like yet another wismen sockpuppet Dee, N8UZE UZE is what drips from your box, tramp! http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. Hocky Puck. Well, that's putting it mildly. From a 20wpm Extra. Not really. "Slow Code" does not use his real name or call here. He's obviously looking for a reaction - aka trolling. He could be anybody. He could be Len Anderson, Brian Burke, Mark Morgan or someone else like Vshah101 or Cutie Boy. The fact that he says he's a 20 wpm Extra doesn't mean he (or she) is. I meant that I, a 20wpm Extra myself, was calling it Hocky Puck. Dee, N8UZE |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with
just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 23:20:47 -0400, "if you say so"
wrote: The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules. that would serve the interests of the ars OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his license http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
I might propose that to the FCC.
20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. I agree. I HATE when I have finishing a contact and some calls me at 5 WPM when I was operating at 20 plus. I dont even respond. |
hi SC
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 05:13:35 -0700, "10-4 Good Buddy"
wrote: I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. I agree. I HATE when I have finishing a contact and some calls me at 5 WPM when I was operating at 20 plus. I dont even respond. right meaning you don't suppport or encourage even the hams that have learned cw http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"I PUNCE" wrote in
oups.com: Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down more. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"10-4 Good Buddy" wrote in
: I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. I agree. I HATE when I have finishing a contact and some calls me at 5 WPM when I was operating at 20 plus. I dont even respond. I hear you, Normally I just tell them: "Catch ya channel 19" and they QSY to 11 meters, but since I don't own a CB I don't show up. It helps clear the freq fast for your next QSO. Try it Sometime. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 23:44:39 GMT, Slow Code wrote:
"I PUNCE" wrote in roups.com: Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down more. she is a Procdoer SC BTw you post plenty of Hom crap yourself but you realy hate all other hams it seems SC http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
wrote in message ... OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his license. That is true. The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them down. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:25:41 -0400, "if you say so"
wrote: wrote in message .. . OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his license. That is true. The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them down. i think it ot hit by the zombie making gas that you in some of the Living Dead movies but other than the assitance of VE's runing test session I have never been ofered assiatnace http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"if you say so" wrote in message ... wrote in message ... OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his license. That is true. The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them down. troll |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
wrote in message ... On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 20:25:41 -0400, "if you say so" wrote: wrote in message . .. OTOH merely advocating something stupid is not cause for revoking his license. That is true. The cause for revoking his license is that he has a problem with following the FCC's rules. The rules are there for the benefit all of us. If he doesn't like the rules he should turn in his license in protest not spread hate. What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them down. i think it ot hit by the zombie making gas that you in some of the Living Dead movies but other than the assitance of VE's runing test session I have never been ofered assiatnace http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com troll |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
|
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... "I PUNCE" wrote in oups.com: Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down more. SC 1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts. 2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in control of the testing policy. 3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with derogatory comments. We can all do our part to create good hams. Dee, N8UZE |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Slow Code wrote: I hear you, Normally I just tell them: "Catch ya channel 19" and they QSY to 11 meters, but since I don't own a CB I don't show up. It helps clear the freq fast for your next QSO. Try it Sometime. SC Yeh, sure you do. You don't know code, and you're not on HF, except for your Part 95 authorization. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"if you say so" wrote in
: What ever happened to the true sprit of ham radio where those with higher knowledge would help left up those with less instead of pushing them down. When is requiring study to make a better ham pushing someone down? Those that work hardest get most. Those that are too lazy to work get welfare checks and CB. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"Dee Flint" wrote in
: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... "I PUNCE" wrote in oups.com: Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down more. SC 1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts. 2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in control of the testing policy. 3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with derogatory comments. We can all do our part to create good hams. Dee, N8UZE I read everything, even Mark in the Dark's gibberish. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
In article , deeflint01
@comcast.net says... "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... "I PUNCE" wrote in oups.com: Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down more. SC 1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts. 2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in control of the testing policy. 3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with derogatory comments. We can all do our part to create good hams. Dee, N8UZE That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! Thanks for your good attitude, Chris (a new ham) |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog wrote: In article , deeflint01 says... "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... "I PUNCE" wrote in oups.com: Dee Flint wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... I might propose that to the FCC. 20 wpm Extra's have more important QSO's than nickle hams and no-coders do, that's why we should get spectrum priority. SC Hocky Puck. From a 20wpm Extra. didn't you mean to say mean to say a "2 min extra"??, you cocksucking fat whore! Dee, N8UZE I've always liked Dee. She has always been one of the few here that doesn't mind arguing policy. I don't know how she has been able to stand all the Woger and Markie homo crap posts, but it's good she hung around to take policy. I just wish she didn't want to see ham radio dumbed down more. SC 1. I filter the idiots out so I don't see their posts. 2. I do not believe in attacking the new hams as they are not in control of the testing policy. 3. The way to get good hams is to elmer the newcomers in the necessary skills and show them how great it can be not drive them out with derogatory comments. We can all do our part to create good hams. Dee, N8UZE That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not walk the talk ........... There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due. Stop mugging Dee. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message .. . On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog wrote: That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not walk the talk .......... There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due. why was no coment due? (not unlike your defense of Todd...you insinuated I had no right to comment, remember?) Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc .... Feeling a bit self-conscious are you? She has said nothing to you or about you. Leave her out of your idiotic meanderings. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
'Mark in the Dark' wrote in
: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message . .. On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog wrote: That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not walk the talk .......... There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due. why was no coment due? Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc Dee is right. You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no class at all. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"Slow Code" wrote in message link.net... 'Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message ... On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog wrote: That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not walk the talk .......... There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due. why was no coment due? Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc Dee is right. You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no class at all. SC By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower class than another. He is unable to differentiate between personal descriptions and regulatory use of terms such as Technicians being a lower class of LICENSE than Generals. He seems to think references of regulatory distinctions are the same as referring to persons. Dee, N8UZE |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Mark in the Dark' wrote in
: On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:16:19 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message thlink.net... 'Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message om... On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog wrote: That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not walk the talk .......... There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due. why was no coment due? Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc Dee is right. You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no class at all. SC By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower class than another. stop your lying dee flint you chose to refer to 300,00 people as lessor hams then refuse to apoligize for or even adknowledge why someone might be offended http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ But they are a lesser class, Mark in the Dark. The more exams you take and pass, the harder you work, the farther up the ladder you go. The problem you have Mark, is that you're so lazy people have to slap your silly ass off the ladder so they can climb up. You're against having good hams. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"Slow Code" wrote in message ink.net... Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 20:16:19 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message rthlink.net... 'Mark in the Dark' wrote in : On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 01:27:10 -0500, "Not Lloyd" anon@anon wrote: wrote in message news:klulj2tcmkejnh69l3blguhf5j5r5u2uop@4ax. com... On Sun, 22 Oct 2006 04:51:46 GMT, Papa Dog wrote: That was a GREAT post!!!!!!! she si fine for words pity that from experence I know she does not walk the talk .......... There you go again, Mark. Commenting where no comment was due. why was no coment due? Dee flint's psting history contains many occasions of her reffering to the lessor ham lesser classes of ham etc Dee is right. You are a lesser class of ham Mark in the Dark. In fact, you have no class at all. SC By the way, I've never referred to any person as being a lesser or lower class than another. stop your lying dee flint you chose to refer to 300,00 people as lessor hams then refuse to apoligize for or even adknowledge why someone might be offended http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/ But they are a lesser class, Mark in the Dark. The more exams you take and pass, the harder you work, the farther up the ladder you go. The problem you have Mark, is that you're so lazy people have to slap your silly ass off the ladder so they can climb up. You're against having good hams. SC As you can see, he is unable to separate license classes from people. I referred only to the licenses not the people. He seems to think that a definition of the license is also a definition of the person. That is absolutely inane. Afterall most of us, including myself, hold a standard driver's license. It is a lower class license than a chauffer's license, CDL B, or CDL A. None of us are "insulted" by the fact the we hold a lower class license. Dee, N8UZE |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
Mark in the Dark' wrote in
: On Mon, 23 Oct 2006 22:17:07 -0400, "Dee Flint" wrote: "Slow Code" wrote in message SC As you can see, he is unable to separate license classes from people. no you lack that skill I referred only to the licenses not the people. He seems to think that a definition of the license is also a definition of the person. That is absolutely inane. Afterall most of us, including myself, hold a standard driver's license. It is a lower class license than a chauffer's license, CDL B, or CDL A. None of us are "insulted" by the fact the we hold a lower class license. but you would if also told that your lower class was the result of being lazy you do not understand the subject of CoNTEXT it is a word you should try learning But you are lazy Mark in the Dark, you refuse to do what it takes to upgrade. You're waiting for the FCC hand-out licenses. SC |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"past"
Spelling? "if you say so" wrote in message ... The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules. |
5 wpm hams need to move if a 20 wpm Extra wants the frequency.
"SHb" wrote in
: "past" Spelling? "if you say so" wrote in message ... The FCC say's that the 20 wpm extras or no more important than someone with just 5 wpm. Isn't that why they changed it from 20 to 5 wpm for ALL HF LICENSE CLASSES. What your talking about is that you don't want to follow FCC rules. If there is a QSO on a frequency YOU should move not the people already there. Unless you have emergency traffic you have NO priority over anyone who is licensed to operate on any giving frequency. Have you even past a ham test? Maybe your license should be revoked until you can prove you have read and fully understand the part 97 FCC rules. He's a product of dumbed down licensing. In schools they call it outcome based education. SC |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:48 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com