![]() |
No-codes and nickle hams are bad examples of what a ham is.
No-codes and nickle hams are bad examples for the type of people we want
for a good radio service. People see no-code and they think ham radio is just another group of people that are appliance operators that talk on radio like CB'ers do and have no skills. If we hadn't dumbed down the test elements for a license, we would have good hams, and people would see the value of the service and know a ham radio license is something that is good to have to work for. SC |
You mispell "nickle" is ignorant just like Bush saying "nucular"
That why you will never be take serious ignoramus. |
No-codes and nickle hams are bad examples of what a ham is.
Mark in the Dark, wrote in
: On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 00:51:02 GMT, Slow Code wrote: No-codes and nickle hams are bad examples for the type of people we want for a good radio service. People see no-code and they think ham radio is just another group of people that are appliance operators that talk on radio like CB'ers do and have no skills. If we hadn't dumbed down the test elements for a license, we would have good hams, and people would see the value of the service and know a ham radio license is something that is good to have to work for. SC no you are the bad example see the amateur code I don't need to see the amateur code. I'm the one that wrote it. SC |
You mispell "nickle" is ignorant just like Bush saying "nucular"
Not toddaug555 wrote in
roups.com: That why you will never be take serious ignoramus. Shut up. It doesn't matter if I'm taken seriously. I'm a 20wpm code tested Extra. I got it all. 73, and good luck in the contest. SC |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com