"John Smith I" wrote in message
...
John Smith I wrote:
To Whom It May Concern:

Just so you have a complete picture of Paul W. Schleck, I took the
following from one of his posts in news.groups.proposals:
...
Now that just speaks volumes about this man, his caliber, his "ethical
standards", etc. Now, doesn't it?

Gawd! I feel sick ...

Warmest regards,
JS

Unbelievable, is there ANYONE here who believes Mr. Schlock... err, Mr.
Schleck would be "fair" and just to ALL? That he would consider ANYTHING
other than his own petty gripes and bitches? If so, step right up here to
defend the man, I am waiting ...

My gawd, the man is so crooked he makes my dogs hind legs look straight!

Regards,
JS


There is nothing in the statement as printed that would justify your
conclusion.

Dee, N8UZE

Dee Flint wrote:

...
There is nothing in the statement as printed that would justify your
conclusion.

Dee, N8UZE



Dee:

I am not the only man who has sat witness to the display of text paul
and his cronies have put on--go back and examine the posts yourself, a
pattern has developed here ... schleck is more a corrupt politician than
anything else I can find to compare him to ...

Regards,
JS