In the Fractal spirit.... Part II
 

http://www.ultra-faster-than-light.c...doesitwork.htm

From the website:
================================================== ==============================
Lorentz has defined an absolute function.
But Maxwell didn't state that his laws confirms the absolute property
of space.
Maxwell defined propagation speed of EM wave relative to source.
And he did it long before Einstein has invented his absolute property
of space.
The magnetic field and electric field component in the near field
propagates
with infinite speed. The effect manifests it self in the following
way:
The EM wave's propagation speed is infinite at the center of radiation
(center of radiating antenna) and gradually
decreases into speed of c at the end of near field.
For the magnetic field emitted by coil inductor antenna which is
substantially smaller than the wavelength,
the effect of infinite speed of change of the field gradient shows no
decries throughout the near field range.
As observed in the experiment ( no variation in signal phase with
distance
from the center of coil).
================================================== ==============================

All your base are belong to us!

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

(If this doesn't make any more sense to you than the "explanation"
quoted below, do a web search on the phrase.)

k4wge wrote:
http://www.ultra-faster-than-light.c...doesitwork.htm

From the website:
================================================== ==============================
Lorentz has defined an absolute function.
But Maxwell didn't state that his laws confirms the absolute property
of space.
Maxwell defined propagation speed of EM wave relative to source.
And he did it long before Einstein has invented his absolute property
of space.
The magnetic field and electric field component in the near field
propagates
with infinite speed. The effect manifests it self in the following
way:
The EM wave's propagation speed is infinite at the center of radiation
(center of radiating antenna) and gradually
decreases into speed of c at the end of near field.
For the magnetic field emitted by coil inductor antenna which is
substantially smaller than the wavelength,
the effect of infinite speed of change of the field gradient shows no
decries throughout the near field range.
As observed in the experiment ( no variation in signal phase with
distance
from the center of coil).
================================================== ==============================

All your base are belong to us!

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

(If this doesn't make any more sense to you than the "explanation"
quoted below, do a web search on the phrase.)

k4wge wrote:
http://www.ultra-faster-than-light.c...doesitwork.htm

From the website:
================================================== ==============================
Lorentz has defined an absolute function.
But Maxwell didn't state that his laws confirms the absolute property
of space.
Maxwell defined propagation speed of EM wave relative to source.
And he did it long before Einstein has invented his absolute property
of space.
The magnetic field and electric field component in the near field
propagates
with infinite speed. The effect manifests it self in the following
way:
The EM wave's propagation speed is infinite at the center of radiation
(center of radiating antenna) and gradually
decreases into speed of c at the end of near field.
For the magnetic field emitted by coil inductor antenna which is
substantially smaller than the wavelength,
the effect of infinite speed of change of the field gradient shows no
decries throughout the near field range.
As observed in the experiment ( no variation in signal phase with
distance
from the center of coil).
================================================== ==============================

I once passed Mandelbrot's office at IBM Watson.
There was only a single picture on the door.
Of Gauss.
H.
NQ5H

"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
All your base are belong to us!

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

(If this doesn't make any more sense to you than the "explanation"
quoted below, do a web search on the phrase.)

bs deleted
(ain't nothin' faster than c, sorry)

I once passed Mandelbrot's office at IBM Watson.
There was only a single picture on the door.
Of Gauss.
H.
NQ5H

"Roy Lewallen" wrote in message
...
All your base are belong to us!

Roy Lewallen, W7EL

(If this doesn't make any more sense to you than the "explanation"
quoted below, do a web search on the phrase.)

bs deleted
(ain't nothin' faster than c, sorry)

Lightspeed? Oh yes, you can show kids that they have 11 fingers!

First grade kid is best.

me:
lets count your fingers. You don't mind if we count up or down?
does it matter?

kid:
no

me:
grabbing one hand of the kid
'OK, let's start. (countings slowly) 10, 9, 8, 7, 6'
'you said, doesn't matter counting up or down?'

kid:
no, does n't matter

me:
ok, let's continue, where did we stop, yeah 6,
(grabbing other hand) hmmm, let's count up now!
(counting fast) 7,8,9,10, 11 - oops, you got 11 fingers?

....faster than speed of light!

73's de Wolfgang OE1MWW

Lightspeed? Oh yes, you can show kids that they have 11 fingers!

First grade kid is best.

me:
lets count your fingers. You don't mind if we count up or down?
does it matter?

kid:
no

me:
grabbing one hand of the kid
'OK, let's start. (countings slowly) 10, 9, 8, 7, 6'
'you said, doesn't matter counting up or down?'

kid:
no, does n't matter

me:
ok, let's continue, where did we stop, yeah 6,
(grabbing other hand) hmmm, let's count up now!
(counting fast) 7,8,9,10, 11 - oops, you got 11 fingers?

....faster than speed of light!

73's de Wolfgang OE1MWW