|
14.313 Jamming.K9BSD, N9PGE, and KK9G.
Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central
indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote: In article LARDASS LLOYD DAVIES "Wussman" wrote: Heard a couple guys on 14.313 saying that they were being jammed by Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ. The same thing happened last weekend, too. Then one of them mentioned something about a "funny farm"..... Sounds like they know Roger. Yet I heard a few hams say that the one playing that gospel music on 14.313 was a no-code Technician, N0VFP. |
Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central
indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... privacy.at Anonymous Remailer wrote: In article LARDASS LLOYD DAVIES "Wussman" wrote: Heard a couple guys on 14.313 saying that they were being jammed by Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ. The same thing happened last weekend, too. Then one of them mentioned something about a "funny farm"..... Sounds like they know Roger. Yet I heard a few hams say that the one playing that gospel music on 14.313 was a no-code Technician, N0VFP. |
"Twice Fired" wrote in message ... Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and violate the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC? I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate filter to keep out the "CBplussers". Clint KB5ZHT |
"Twice Fired" wrote in message ... Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and violate the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC? I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate filter to keep out the "CBplussers". Clint KB5ZHT |
Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like
that. You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! 73, Dan W7RF "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... "Twice Fired" wrote in message ... Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and violate the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC? I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate filter to keep out the "CBplussers". Clint KB5ZHT |
Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like
that. You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! 73, Dan W7RF "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... "Twice Fired" wrote in message ... Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and violate the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC? I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate filter to keep out the "CBplussers". Clint KB5ZHT |
You people are really dumb. Anybody can say anything and accuse anyone they
want, and you believe it. Amazing. Dan/W4NTI "Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02... Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like that. You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! 73, Dan W7RF "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... "Twice Fired" wrote in message ... Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and violate the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC? I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate filter to keep out the "CBplussers". Clint KB5ZHT |
You people are really dumb. Anybody can say anything and accuse anyone they
want, and you believe it. Amazing. Dan/W4NTI "Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02... Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like that. You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! 73, Dan W7RF "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... "Twice Fired" wrote in message ... Jamming on 313? K9BSD, N9PGE, KK9G have been doing that from central indiana for years..... No wives, no life, nothing. Just a whiskey bottle and ocd. Truly pathetic... HOW CAN THAT BE?!?!?!? You must obviously be mistaken. Those guys passed morse code tests, and yet they're disruptive, cause trouble and violate the ham radio laws & rules laid forth by the FCC? I was *sure* the PCTA crowd said that the morse code test was an adequate filter to keep out the "CBplussers". Clint KB5ZHT |
"Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02... Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like that. Oh, now, you're just reaching on that one. You could use that line of thinking to support ANYTHING. The fact is, one of the strongest and loudest responses you hear from the PCTA group is that it is suppose to filter OUT people like that; given that this is just but SOME proof that it doesn't, thier argument fails. Not only that, it's on record that the majority of rules violaters ARE hams with morse code endorsement... yet MORE evidence to prove that morse code testing does not filter out the "yahoos". You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. Any anything else that is required to learn that has no real factual reasoning or basis and is a total waste of time. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! ....until the FCC says that it is no LONGER what it takes to be a ham. THEN, a person can become one without the morse code testing. Clint KB5ZHT |
"Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02... Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like that. Oh, now, you're just reaching on that one. You could use that line of thinking to support ANYTHING. The fact is, one of the strongest and loudest responses you hear from the PCTA group is that it is suppose to filter OUT people like that; given that this is just but SOME proof that it doesn't, thier argument fails. Not only that, it's on record that the majority of rules violaters ARE hams with morse code endorsement... yet MORE evidence to prove that morse code testing does not filter out the "yahoos". You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. Any anything else that is required to learn that has no real factual reasoning or basis and is a total waste of time. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! ....until the FCC says that it is no LONGER what it takes to be a ham. THEN, a person can become one without the morse code testing. Clint KB5ZHT |
"William H." wrote in message ... "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... "Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02... Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like that. Oh, now, you're just reaching on that one. You could use that line of thinking to support ANYTHING. The fact is, one of the strongest and loudest responses you hear from the PCTA group is that it is suppose to filter OUT people like that; given that this is just but SOME proof that it doesn't, thier argument fails. Not only that, it's on record that the majority of rules violaters ARE hams with morse code endorsement... yet MORE evidence to prove that morse code testing does not filter out the "yahoos". You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. Any anything else that is required to learn that has no real factual reasoning or basis and is a total waste of time. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! ...until the FCC says that it is no LONGER what it takes to be a ham. THEN, a person can become one without the morse code testing. Clint KB5ZHT .......... Note that the original post did NOT accuse anybody of jamming. I looked at the post...the statement was, "Heard a couple guys on 14.313 saying that they were being jammed by Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ. " The follow-up posts went on to outright accuse others of jamming. W4NTI was right when he said, "You people are really dumb. Anybody can say anything and accuse anyone they want, and you believe it. Amazing." After looking up each of the calls and doing a Rain Report search, only ONE of the calls showed any attention from Riley Hollingsworth, and THAT person was made by Riley to retest after receiving letters of warning concerning willful and malicious interference. Of course this in itself proves nothing, just as malicious accusations prove nothing. W4NTI is correct. Thank you. I was hopeing there was someone out there that had a brain, and new how to use it. Dan/W4NTI |
"William H." wrote in message ... "Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message ... "Radiodan-W7RF" wrote in message news:Gdelb.197759$%h1.191867@sccrnsc02... Without standards and lowering of standards, there would be MORE guys like that. Oh, now, you're just reaching on that one. You could use that line of thinking to support ANYTHING. The fact is, one of the strongest and loudest responses you hear from the PCTA group is that it is suppose to filter OUT people like that; given that this is just but SOME proof that it doesn't, thier argument fails. Not only that, it's on record that the majority of rules violaters ARE hams with morse code endorsement... yet MORE evidence to prove that morse code testing does not filter out the "yahoos". You sound sore about learning morse code, try to get over it. Any anything else that is required to learn that has no real factual reasoning or basis and is a total waste of time. This is what it takes to be a HAM. Either do what it takes to get the job done or don't join our ranks! ...until the FCC says that it is no LONGER what it takes to be a ham. THEN, a person can become one without the morse code testing. Clint KB5ZHT .......... Note that the original post did NOT accuse anybody of jamming. I looked at the post...the statement was, "Heard a couple guys on 14.313 saying that they were being jammed by Roger Wiseman, AB8MQ. " The follow-up posts went on to outright accuse others of jamming. W4NTI was right when he said, "You people are really dumb. Anybody can say anything and accuse anyone they want, and you believe it. Amazing." After looking up each of the calls and doing a Rain Report search, only ONE of the calls showed any attention from Riley Hollingsworth, and THAT person was made by Riley to retest after receiving letters of warning concerning willful and malicious interference. Of course this in itself proves nothing, just as malicious accusations prove nothing. W4NTI is correct. Thank you. I was hopeing there was someone out there that had a brain, and new how to use it. Dan/W4NTI |
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:32:06 -0500, "Rick Phillips" NoSpam@NoSpam
wrote: If you are going to tell it, tell it straight. THAT person only recieved ONE warning letter and was made to retest, yet the letter did not give interference as being the reason for the retest. This newsgroup has already hashed and rehashed THAT person's retest, ad nauseaum. One letter? No "interference"? Read everything closely. There were three letters sent. The letters to both Wiseman and Tunder were a preemptive "warning" that did not allege any activities. That hardly qualifies as a warning in the context of someone having actually done something. The letter with the warning in it ALLEGED interference, and warned of consequences. The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would be a good example. Only one letter was a warning referring to interference. So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight. LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net |
On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 20:32:06 -0500, "Rick Phillips" NoSpam@NoSpam
wrote: If you are going to tell it, tell it straight. THAT person only recieved ONE warning letter and was made to retest, yet the letter did not give interference as being the reason for the retest. This newsgroup has already hashed and rehashed THAT person's retest, ad nauseaum. One letter? No "interference"? Read everything closely. There were three letters sent. The letters to both Wiseman and Tunder were a preemptive "warning" that did not allege any activities. That hardly qualifies as a warning in the context of someone having actually done something. The letter with the warning in it ALLEGED interference, and warned of consequences. The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number of reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the addressee's actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the test, would be a good example. Only one letter was a warning referring to interference. So, yes; if you are going to tell it, tell it straight. LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:06 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com