Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Code? Schmode! (what a load?)
You "hams" want to keep the pride and technical prowess within Amateur Radio into the new Century? Then do this: 1) Eliminate ALL code testing for ALL License classes. 2) Enact a complete re-vamping of the pool of the written exam questions. (and now for the rub) 3) DO NOT PUBLISH the question pools - PERIOD ! If someone wants an Amateur License, then they should have a working technical and theoretical knowledge of RF Theorems and all related aspects of electrical and electronic practice. It used to be that if you were an Amateur Operator you had to demonstrate a degree of professionality and knowledge Having an Extra Class licence should be *almost equal* to someone who has a BSEE. Both should be able to answer questions on varied topics of Electrical Engineering with a reasonable degree of competence. Until something along these lines is attempted, Amateur Radio will be nothing more than glorified CB radio. I've been to enough club meetings and hamfests where I've seen holders of Extra Class tickets who couldn't comprehend even the most basic of electronics theory. It didn't used to be this way! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Morbeius wrote: 2) Enact a complete re-vamping of the pool of the written exam questions. (and now for the rub) 3) DO NOT PUBLISH the question pools - PERIOD ! It used to be that way. Remember the "Dick Bash" books. These came out when the FCC was still administering Amateur tests. The FCC didn't release the question pool or the answers. Ham applicants would send the questions in the remembered from the tests and Bash would publish them. Andy WD4KDN "People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf." George Orwell |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds just like the system we have here in Australia!
Good luck getting it in the US Murray vk4aok Morbeius wrote: Code? Schmode! (what a load?) You "hams" want to keep the pride and technical prowess within Amateur Radio into the new Century? Then do this: 1) Eliminate ALL code testing for ALL License classes. 2) Enact a complete re-vamping of the pool of the written exam questions. (and now for the rub) 3) DO NOT PUBLISH the question pools - PERIOD ! If someone wants an Amateur License, then they should have a working technical and theoretical knowledge of RF Theorems and all related aspects of electrical and electronic practice. Murray Kelly vk4aok |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Morbeius wrote:
Code? Schmode! (what a load?) You "hams" want to keep the pride and technical prowess within Amateur Radio into the new Century? Then do this: 1) Eliminate ALL code testing for ALL License classes. 2) Enact a complete re-vamping of the pool of the written exam questions. (and now for the rub) 3) DO NOT PUBLISH the question pools - PERIOD ! Even better would be to ask questions that were not covered in ANY book. That'd make sure only good smart people got in. Seriously, there is not much these days that doesn't have a supply of Q and A's somewhere. I was up at Barnes and Noble a few days ago, and saw they have pools for many professional trades. Electrician, HVAC pro's, etc. You will have a looong haul to get the pool eliminated for Ham radio tests. The answers in the pool are shuffled around for at least the Extra test. There are 806 questions to choose from, up from 665 in the previous pool. What is the difference between a pool of questions and a book in which the answers are in there in text form - or do you suggest that there be no actual study guide for the tests? If there is a study guide without the needed material in it, it isn't a study guide. If someone wants an Amateur License, then they should have a working technical and theoretical knowledge of RF Theorems and all related aspects of electrical and electronic practice. It used to be that if you were an Amateur Operator you had to demonstrate a degree of professionality and knowledge How was professionality demonstrated on the test process? Having an Extra Class licence should be *almost equal* to someone who has a BSEE. Both should be able to answer questions on varied topics of Electrical Engineering with a reasonable degree of competence. Good heavens! A person has to take "almost" 4 years of college to qualify for Extra? If ya wanna tie it to education, how about BS for Technician, MS for General and PHD for Extra. Then all those hams would be real smart! Until something along these lines is attempted, Amateur Radio will be nothing more than glorified CB radio. I've been to enough club meetings and hamfests where I've seen holders of Extra Class tickets who couldn't comprehend even the most basic of electronics theory. It didn't used to be this way! DLTDHYAOTWO! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike,
If BS were to be the qualifying factor for a Tech, everyone in the newsgroups would likely qualify ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.574 / Virus Database: 364 - Release Date: 1/29/04 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Hampton wrote:
Mike, If BS were to be the qualifying factor for a Tech, everyone in the newsgroups would likely qualify ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Haven't heard from you for a while, Jim! |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Coslo wrote in message ...
Jim Hampton wrote: Mike, If BS were to be the qualifying factor for a Tech, everyone in the newsgroups would likely qualify ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA Haven't heard from you for a while, Jim! I don't see the point of code being a requirement these days, but I don't see the "no code" licensing the only reason for all the wackos being on the HAM band. Good HAM's totally outnumber bad HAM's, the majority of HAM's I've listened too are good users of the bands. There has been always wackos and crackpots on the radio, and then you have your old-school HAM's who passed all those code tests back in the day and still act like kooks. I've certainily heard them on there. It's the responsibility factor, not much of this exists these days, especially when times change, your going to have more increasing numbers of kooks no matter if the code is eliminated or not. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Or as Burt Fisher would say HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHIHI HIHI Bob--KD8WU U of M GO BLUE!! GOD, GUNS, and GUTS PROTECT AMERICA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|