Ham Congressmen support restructuring
 

http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=382

So much for the idea that congresspersons, even if they're hams, have
any intelligence. The ARRL proposal is a disaster waiting to happen.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB
ARRL Vice Director (Retired)

In article ,
"Hamguy" wrote:

http://www.hamwave.com/cgi-bin/index...iewnews&id=382


As our numbers continue to dwindle regardless of this proposal, in fact
this may make the numbers go down faster, I give ham radio 10 maybe 15
years and it'll be gone except for a tiny BPL/Part 15 device shared hf
band of frequencies sort of like 17 meters only it will be channelized
like 60 meters. There won't be any need for more, only less. The
commercal interests will gobble it up and the spectrum will be filled
with digital garbage from gadgets yet to be invented.

Dale, K9VUJ

--
Email:

Your right good thing someone still remember what HAM radio all about.
73 Bill WA0KBZ

"KØHB" wrote in message
ink.net...


So much for the idea that congresspersons, even if they're hams, have
any intelligence. The ARRL proposal is a disaster waiting to happen.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB
ARRL Vice Director (Retired)

"Bill Turner" wrote

Grammar?

Point?

The ARRL proposal is a disaster waiting to happen.


You are narrow minded, anyone ever tell you that?


Lloyd Davies - Time Lord and Talk show host
"On the Domestic Front"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domesticfront/

I give ham radio 10 maybe 15
years and it'll be gone except for a tiny BPL/Part 15 device shared hf
band of frequencies sort of like 17 meters only it will be channelized
like 60 meters.

I disagree. I think the no-code HF will help sales of radios and help the
ARRL, and will finally get me on HF. I've tried to learn code for over 10
years and still can't get it. I should'nt be penalized because of that.

Got it?


Lloyd Davies - Time Lord and Talk show host
"On the Domestic Front"
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/domesticfront/