LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old March 25th 05, 10:49 PM
Dan/W4NTI
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Martin, VK2UMJ" wrote in message
...
"Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message
ink.net...

[SNIP]


You *MUST* be a licensed Amateur to use IRLP, you *MUST* use a radio to
access IRLP. Therefore it is getting *LICENSED AMATEURS* on air.

It in *NO* way interferes with your on air activities so leave it alone
and enjoy your hobby without *INTERFERING* with others.


--
The views I present are my own and NOT of any organisation I belong to.

73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
http://www.aca.gov.au/pls/radcom/cli...IENT_NO=157452
VoIP http://www.TALKonIP.com.au/


How is that "LICENSE" proven? Who or what checks it? How is that done?

Dan/W4NTI


The same way any valid licence is checked when you use any ham frequency -
by "self regulation".

Using IRLP is no different than firing up on your local repeater that is
linked to some other repeater in the distance. There is the exact same
potential for unlicensed users on IRLP as there is on any other amateur
frequency, no more, no less. Yet you don't seem to be claiming that 2m is
open to CBers, or that 40m is not a valid ham band.....

If you accept that linking amateur repeaters via land line is OK, then you
have no basis upon which to reject IRLP - it is the same, linking
repeaters via land lines, except it uses internet technology to make that
affordable for anyone rather than the expense of a dedicated leased line..
Without the VOiP linking repeaters by landline can be rather costly, so
the number of repeaters you could link would be limited. Now that expense
has been removed so that any local club, or local ham, can establish a
node and allow the repeater to be linked to any one of thousands of other
ham repeaters worldwide. Seems that all they have done is expand existing
technology - isn't that what ham radio is all about??????

Then again, we faced this kind of narrow minded, arrogant discrimination
when they proposed access to amateur frequencies by operators that hadn't
learnt CW... Seems it is just another example of the old timers stomping
their feet because times are changing - must've been real hard when valves
were replaced!


--
Martin, VK2UMJ

To reply by e-mail, replace ".invalid" with ".com.au"


"I cannot help but notice that there is no problem
between us that cannot be solved by your departure."




You may indeed be correct....I am confusing IRLP with echolink......I think
I'll go on google and see what others have to say about it.

Dan/W4NTI


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #697 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 February 13th 05 07:34 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 2 October 25th 04 04:04 AM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Dx 0 October 24th 04 09:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta General 0 October 24th 04 09:22 PM
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #682 Tedd Mirgliotta Info 0 October 24th 04 09:22 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017