|
wrote in message ups.com... Lloyd wrote: On 14 May 2005 17:53:38 -0700, wrote: NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.22.200.44 - nelson.keesler.af.mil My money would be on Dan. He is a "real" cw operator, good fist too! Says Les as he (1) misuses taxpayer-furnished computing equipment at Keesler AFB, and (2) fails to mention that he doesn't hold a ham license and therefore isn't qualified to comment on someone's "fist." The really odd part of this whole thread is that anyone at all thinks the subject is important. If a code operator can send faster than someone at an itty-bitty keyboard can, does a fish need a bicycle? I can copy it faster than you can send it peckerbreath! Les If this is the "real Lloyd" then he is the one that has nothing to say. A no code Tech with total inability to even learn 5 wpm. I would take Les any day, even without a ticket, over this loser Lloyd. Dan/W4NTI |
"John" wrote in message ... Dr.Ace - WH2T wrote: "Dan/W4NTI" wrote in message nk.net... "Hamguy" wrote in message ... Phone would'a kicked all of their asses! Heck...Echolink would have SMOKED 'em too! Think so, do you? I'll bet I can get more thru put on CW than you can on phone in the same amount of time. I'm not talking about a short sentence. I mean real traffic. Dan/W4NTI Tell him Dan. We don't need no stinking text messaging. Echolink : Play amateur radio operator "No radio or antenna needed". Ace - WH2T How do you figure that the CW throughput will beat phone - at least for clear text. I know that good CW ops can sail along at 50 wpm ( like my Dad, unfortunately not me). But I thought speech was more like 200-300 wpm. So if you do not need to spell out unusual words, phone should beat CW easily. The results could differ if we factor in odd ball words or code groups and QRM/QRN but I thought this was simply clear text. John I base it on my experience as a traffic handler in both Amateur and MARS radio. I base it on my experience of personally copying 5 character coded groups in phone and in CW modes on a military circuit. CW has better through put. You hit on the problem yourself. Having to slow down to make sure the other operator copied the text sent. Normally by using the phonetic alphabet. A good CW circuit does not have that problem, and with the use of "cut" characters a whole word/sentence can be sent without sending each individual character. Dan/W4NTI |
"SMUG G1" wrote in message ups.com... What's the URL? www.qrq.org.uk as usual? look at www.qrz.com then follow the link. :) |
Lloyd wrote: On 15 May 2005 10:51:16 -0700, drooled: Lloyd wrote: On 14 May 2005 17:53:38 -0700, wrote: NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.22.200.44 - nelson.keesler.af.mil My money would be on Dan. He is a "real" cw operator, good fist too! Says Les as he (1) misuses taxpayer-furnished computing equipment at Keesler AFB, and (2) fails to mention that he doesn't hold a ham license and therefore isn't qualified to comment on someone's "fist." The really odd part of this whole thread is that anyone at all thinks the subject is important. If a code operator can send faster than someone at an itty-bitty keyboard can, does a fish need a bicycle? I can copy it faster than you can send it peckerbreath! Don't matter. You've spent years dissing ham radio while stealing from the taxpayers. Time for you to STFU, geezer, 'cause your opinion don't mean squat. (I see you quietly stopped using Keesler AFB computers to proxy your posts. You must be a little frightened that the CO will find out.) Hey Dan: Why do you ignore Les' misuse of Air Force property? Some patriot you are. Dan and I are friends dimwit. Kinda burns you up, me being able to post when I want doesn't it? Dissing ham radio? Not me, I repair radios for amateur operators all the time. I'm not worried about anyone saying anything about me posting from a computer where I work. Find someone else to stalk you dork! Les |
wrote in message
oups.com... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Hamguy" wrote in message ... Phone would'a kicked all of their asses! Heck...Echolink would have SMOKED 'em too! Think so, do you? I'll bet I can get more thru put on CW than you can on phone in the same amount of time. I'm not talking about a short sentence. I mean real traffic. Dan/W4NTI My money would be on Dan. He is a "real" cw operator, good fist too! Les Thanks Les, good to hear from you again. Dan/W4NTI Little does Lloyd know. That isn't the real dumbass No-Code Lloyd, just another gay stalker. Dan was a high speed morse intercept operator in the military. I can tell the difference between straight keys, keyers, and bugs. Just happens I can copy code just fine. Never had a desire to get a ham ticket. No big deal to me. Dan and I have known each other for several years. Les |
wrote in message oups.com... Lloyd wrote: On 15 May 2005 10:51:16 -0700, drooled: Lloyd wrote: On 14 May 2005 17:53:38 -0700, wrote: NNTP-Posting-Host: 131.22.200.44 - nelson.keesler.af.mil My money would be on Dan. He is a "real" cw operator, good fist too! Says Les as he (1) misuses taxpayer-furnished computing equipment at Keesler AFB, and (2) fails to mention that he doesn't hold a ham license and therefore isn't qualified to comment on someone's "fist." The really odd part of this whole thread is that anyone at all thinks the subject is important. If a code operator can send faster than someone at an itty-bitty keyboard can, does a fish need a bicycle? I can copy it faster than you can send it peckerbreath! Don't matter. You've spent years dissing ham radio while stealing from the taxpayers. Time for you to STFU, geezer, 'cause your opinion don't mean squat. (I see you quietly stopped using Keesler AFB computers to proxy your posts. You must be a little frightened that the CO will find out.) Hey Dan: Why do you ignore Les' misuse of Air Force property? Some patriot you are. Dan and I are friends dimwit. Kinda burns you up, me being able to post when I want doesn't it? Dissing ham radio? Not me, I repair radios for amateur operators all the time. I'm not worried about anyone saying anything about me posting from a computer where I work. Find someone else to stalk you dork! Les Sounds to me he is jealous. He must have been stopped by his boss (the pimple faced 16 year old) from using the Pizza joints coco II machine. Dan/W4NTI |
wrote in message oups.com... wrote in message oups.com... - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dan/W4NTI wrote: "Hamguy" wrote in message ... Phone would'a kicked all of their asses! Heck...Echolink would have SMOKED 'em too! Think so, do you? I'll bet I can get more thru put on CW than you can on phone in the same amount of time. I'm not talking about a short sentence. I mean real traffic. Dan/W4NTI My money would be on Dan. He is a "real" cw operator, good fist too! Les Thanks Les, good to hear from you again. Dan/W4NTI Little does Lloyd know. That isn't the real dumbass No-Code Lloyd, just another gay stalker. Dan was a high speed morse intercept operator in the military. I can tell the difference between straight keys, keyers, and bugs. Just happens I can copy code just fine. Never had a desire to get a ham ticket. No big deal to me. Dan and I have known each other for several years. Les Certainly can. In fact a guy on a "keyer" also has a nice signature. Lots of folks that don't know...just don't know. Dan/W4NTI |
I hope you idiots that bottom post without snipping almost all of the
relevant quoted message understand that 95% of us wouldn't take the trouble to see what such an ignoramus posted. Jim "John" wrote in message ... |
"KC8GXW" wrote in message ... KC8GXW wrote: Top posting to save some scrolling. All of this comes down to one thing, CW beat the TEXT guys. Whatever is faster or slower, the rabbit or the hare, it's all redundant. There has been three such test that I've heard of and in all three CW won. Maybe the text lagged by 10 seconds, maybe K6CTW filled in the last 2 words. The bottom line is that it was a race and CW won! (2) Yaesu FT-817's $1178.45 (2) Telegrapher uniforms $ 156.99 The look on the text guys face Priceless Let me say right off- CW is my favorite and almost only mode. With that said this contest (which I enjoyed watching) was more about the data entry system than it was the mode. Given large ergonomic keyboards I believe the touch typist could beat my paddle handily. W4OP |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com