|
N9OGL's future ???
|
I don't think so danny
TODD N9OGL THE N9OGL SHOW 14.321.00 MHz |
n9ogl wrote: I don't think so danny TODD N9OGL THE N9OGL SHOW 14.321.00 MHz You better think so you illiterate retard! You are about on a level of Lloyd A. Davies. Think twice before answering, asshole! George Ashley W4FQF |
You better think so you illiterate retard!
You are about on a level of Lloyd A. Davies. Think twice before answering, asshole! George Ashley W4FQF I don't know Lloyd A Davies, and no way am I anything like him, I suggest you get facts correct old timer. |
"n9ogl" wrote in message oups.com... I don't think so danny TODD N9OGL THE N9OGL SHOW 14.321.00 MHz Of course you don't Toad. Neither did MAN when it all got started. Dan/W4NTI |
Danny boy, there's a BIG difference between me and K1MAN, but you and
your little buddies on here are so stupid that you can't understand. The main difference is I pick a unused frequency and ask if the frequency is in use, and if no one answer I use the frequency. There's the BIG difference, between me and K1MAN, but hey, I'm talking to bunch of dumb narrow-minded licensed CB operators, who can't look outside the box. Secondly I don't have any Pecuniary Interest, But stupid people like forget that although there is a "banned" on Pecuniary Interest, Some Pecuniary Interest is allowed. For example, A person can order a pizza on a repeater, or if and a man and wife are both amateur operators she can call him on the radio and pick something up at the store. plus if your a club station and run a Information bulletin or morse code practice 40 hours a week (that's 8 hours a day) can compensate the control operator, so pecuniary interest is NOT complete banned from ham radio, but what would you know. Finally, Content, the FCC is prohibited for controlling the content of any station (47 USC 326) This has been upheld by the court of appeal and the US Supreme Court. but hey I bunch of cry-baby licensed CB operators who think they amateur's know. The rule dealing with the content of a Information bulletin can be found and is codified in 47 CFR 97.3(a)(25) Nowhere in 97.3(a)(25) or 47 CFR 97.111(b)(6) does it state an Information bulletin have to newscast, it only states that a information bulletin has to be directed to amateur radio operators, consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service. But, hey what would a bunch of half-wit licensed CB operators know. Todd N9OGL THE N9OGL SHOW 14.321.00 Saturday's @ 4.00 pm CST http://n9ogl.proboards50.com/index.cgi THE N9OGL BBS |
"n9ogl" wrote in message oups.com... Danny boy, there's a BIG difference between me and K1MAN, but you and your little buddies on here are so stupid that you can't understand. The main difference is I pick a unused frequency and ask if the frequency is in use, and if no one answer I use the frequency. To do what with? To spew your "opinions". That is NOT a bulletin Toad. There's the BIG difference, between me and K1MAN, but hey, I'm talking to bunch of dumb narrow-minded licensed CB operators, who can't look outside the box. Tell me Toad, what has CB got to do with this discussion? Other than the obvious fact that it is where you learned all you "know" about Amateur Radio. And FYI I am one of the very few Amateurs that never played on CB. Other than when I fixed the pieces of crap and got a radio check....and immediatly turned it off. snip More redundant prattle from the Toad. Dan/W4NTI |
Dan/W4NTI wrote: "n9ogl" wrote in message oups.com... Danny boy, there's a BIG difference between me and K1MAN, but you and your little buddies on here are so stupid that you can't understand. The main difference is I pick a unused frequency and ask if the frequency is in use, and if no one answer I use the frequency. To do what with? To spew your "opinions". That is NOT a bulletin Toad. thee are no rules concerningsuch content, If you think there should be then submit your thoughts to the FCC as provided for by law There's the BIG difference, between me and K1MAN, but hey, I'm talking to bunch of dumb narrow-minded licensed CB operators, who can't look outside the box. Tell me Toad, what has CB got to do with this discussion? Other than the obvious fact that it is where you learned all you "know" about Amateur Radio. And FYI I am one of the very few Amateurs that never played on CB. Other than when I fixed the pieces of crap and got a radio check....and immediatly turned it off. so you are a snob snip More redundant prattle from the Toad. Dan/W4NTI |
To do what with? To spew your "opinions". That is NOT a bulletin Toad.
I see dan you didn't read my post or you snipped it because the fact is I'm tell the truth and you don't want to hear the truth. Like I've said many times before you show me an FCC rule or a final order from the FCC that say's an Information bulletin can't be opinionated, the truth is there is none, I know it and all the other morons on this newsgroup know it but they don't have the balls to admit to it. the both line is your all so narrow-minded that you can't look outside your little box. All you have to do is read and do research, but you moron on this newsgroup either don't want to or can't Todd N9OGL THE N9OGL BBS http://n9ogl.proboards50.com/index.cgi? |
Tell me Toad, what has CB got to do with this discussion? Other than the
obvious fact that it is where you learned all you "know" about Amateur Radio. And FYI I am one of the very few Amateurs that never played on CB. Other than when I fixed the pieces of crap and got a radio check....and immediatly turned it off. Oh we know where your coming from dan, this was sent to my email today.... From: "Dan/W4NTI" Add to Address Book To: Subject: [The Voice of Amateur Radio] 7/19/2005 04:27:14 PM Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Todd, stop posting pictures of girls when you know that you squealed in ecstasy when I put my dick deep in your ass and made you cum three times in a row and stain your mother's kitchen table cloth. It was good and I want to do it again. I'm even touching myself as I type this. your lover, Dan W4NTI -- Posted by Dan/W4NTI to The Voice of Amateur Radio at 7/19/2005 04:27:14 PM HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Todd N9OGL |
"n9ogl" wrote in message snipped but hey, I'm talking to bunch of dumb narrow-minded licensed CB operators, who can't look outside the box. snipped but hey I bunch of cry-baby licensed CB operators who think they amateur's know. 47 CFR 97.3(a)(25) or 47 CFR 97.111(b)(6) states that a information bulletin has to be directed to amateur radio operators, consisting solely of subject matter of DIRECT INTEREST to the amateur service. But, hey what would a bunch of half-wit licensed CB operators know. Toad N9OGL THE N9OGL SHOW SUCKS 14.321 http://n9ogl.WhoCares/index.cgi THE N9OGL BS First let me quote Dan/W4NTI "Tell me Toad, what has CB got to do with this discussion? Other than the obvious fact that it is where you learned all you "know" about Amateur Radio." Thanks Dan, I couldn't have said it better. Todd I seriously doubt that you have anything to say that would be of DIRECT INTEREST to the amateur service. You MIGHT have something to say that would interest a bunch of dumb, narrow-minded, cry-baby, half-wit, CB operators. But I doubt it. One last thing, since an_old_friend doesn't have a call sign his/her opinion is of NO relevance in an amateur radio news group. Just my 2 cents. Ace - WH2T |
Todd I seriously doubt that you have anything to say that would be of DIRECT
INTEREST to the amateur service. You MIGHT have something to say that would interest a bunch of dumb, narrow-minded, cry-baby, half-wit, CB operators. But I doubt it. First off Doc, how would you know, have you heard my bulletin?? Secondly and this is the important part, the FCC has stated it is up to the control operator of the station transmitting the Information bulletin to determine if it's of interest to the amateur radio service, NOT the people listening. http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ama...ations.html#s3 Todd N9OGL |
On 20 Jul 2005 01:15:52 -0700, "n9ogl" wrote:
Todd I seriously doubt that you have anything to say that would be of DIRECT INTEREST to the amateur service. You MIGHT have something to say that would interest a bunch of dumb, narrow-minded, cry-baby, half-wit, CB operators. But I doubt it. First off Doc, how would you know, have you heard my bulletin?? Secondly and this is the important part, the FCC has stated it is up to the control operator of the station transmitting the Information bulletin to determine if it's of interest to the amateur radio service, NOT the people listening. http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ama...ations.html#s3 Q. What is an "information bulletin"? A. The term is defined in Section 97.3. It is a message directed only to amateur operators and consists solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service. The control operator of the station transmitting an information bulletin is responsible for determining that the subject matter is of direct interest to the amateur service. That's the cite that you were too lazy to paste. There's a subtle but very important difference between what it says and what you purport it to say. It says that you, the control operator, are responsible for determining that the subject matter is of direct interest to the amateur service. It doesn't say you get to decide that it is. You must ensure that it is. You can be sure that if the FCC interprets your content as not of direct interest to the amateur service (most likely based on complaints of listeners) you will find yourself spending lots of time and money explaining why it wasn't. -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 |
Here's somethiong you forgot to paste.
From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003] [Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between January 7, 2003 and February 12, 2003] [CITE: 47USC326] TITLE 47--TELEGRAPHS, TELEPHONES, AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS CHAPTER 5--WIRE OR RADIO COMMUNICATION SUBCHAPTER III--SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO RADIO Part I--General Provisions Sec. 326. Censorship Nothing in this chapter shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of censorship over the radio communications or signals transmitted by any radio station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of radio communication. (June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, Sec. 326, 48 Stat. 1091; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, Sec. 21, 62 Stat. 862.) Amendments 1948--Act June 25, 1948, repealed last sentence relating to use of indecent language. See section 1464 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Effective Date of 1948 Amendment Amendment by act June 25, 1948, effective as of Sept. 1, 1948, see section 20 of that act. |
On 20 Jul 2005 08:09:11 -0700, "n9ogl" wrote:
Here's somethiong you forgot to paste. No, I was responding to the specific cite you provided. As to the following, you armchair lawyers love to find passages in the regs and apply them out of context. For example, reading the following makes me think that the FCC has erred every time they've fined Howard Stern and when they fined all the stations after the Janet Jackson brouhaha. Either they're wrong...or you are. Guess where my money is. From the U.S. Code Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [Laws in effect as of January 7, 2003] [Document not affected by Public Laws enacted between January 7, 2003 and February 12, 2003] [CITE: 47USC326] TITLE 47--TELEGRAPHS, TELEPHONES, AND RADIOTELEGRAPHS CHAPTER 5--WIRE OR RADIO COMMUNICATION SUBCHAPTER III--SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO RADIO Part I--General Provisions Sec. 326. Censorship Nothing in this chapter shall be understood or construed to give the Commission the power of censorship over the radio communications or signals transmitted by any radio station, and no regulation or condition shall be promulgated or fixed by the Commission which shall interfere with the right of free speech by means of radio communication. (June 19, 1934, ch. 652, title III, Sec. 326, 48 Stat. 1091; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, Sec. 21, 62 Stat. 862.) Amendments 1948--Act June 25, 1948, repealed last sentence relating to use of indecent language. See section 1464 of Title 18, Crimes and Criminal Procedure. Effective Date of 1948 Amendment Amendment by act June 25, 1948, effective as of Sept. 1, 1948, see section 20 of that act. -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 |
As to the following, you armchair lawyers love to find passages in the
regs and apply them out of context. For example, reading the following makes me think that the FCC has erred every time they've fined Howard Stern and when they fined all the stations after the Janet Jackson brouhaha. The ONLY content they are allowed to regulated under the law, even that one is obscene and indecent material, and that's it. As long as it not obscene or indecent the FCC can't regulate it. |
No, I was responding to the specific cite you provided.
As to the following, you armchair lawyers love to find passages in the regs and apply them out of context. For example, reading the following makes me think that the FCC has erred every time they've fined Howard Stern and when they fined all the stations after the Janet Jackson brouhaha. Either they're wrong...or you are. Guess where my money is. The ONLY thing the FCC is allowed to regulated regarding content is Obscene and indecent material and that's they only thing they are allowed to regulate. Todd N9OGL |
On 20 Jul 2005 12:01:07 -0700, "n9ogl" wrote:
As to the following, you armchair lawyers love to find passages in the regs and apply them out of context. For example, reading the following makes me think that the FCC has erred every time they've fined Howard Stern and when they fined all the stations after the Janet Jackson brouhaha. The ONLY content they are allowed to regulated under the law, even that one is obscene and indecent material, and that's it. As long as it not obscene or indecent the FCC can't regulate it. That's not what the passage you cited says. But you see, they can pretty much do what they want. Of course armchair lawyers think they can win these cases in court. Go ahead. If you think you can say anything you want on the air, have a ball. When you have your ass handed to you by the FCC, give me a jingle, I'll be glad to hand you a towel. -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net Proud participant of rec.woodworking since February, 1997 |
Obscene and Indecent material falls under a different catagory, which
is the federal courts has ruled in the past that obscene and indecent material is not protected by the first amendment, while other content is. As I've stated before show me a final order or a rule that states an Information bulletin can not be opinionated. The FCC IMHO isn't going to go after some moron who gets on the radio spectrum and has a show, and he spews his opinion that a 4 bay antenna is a lot better in his opinion over a J-Pole. The REAL main difference between Broadcasting and an Information bulletin is a Broadcast is directed to the general public as a whole, while an Information bulletin is directed to a certain group. The FCC BELIEVES they can do what ever they want however the federal courts has REPEATIVELY said other wise when it comes to regular content, instead of Un-first amendment content. Todd N9OGL |
Oh I read everything you say. I just get tired of reading it several times
in the same paragraph. Dan/W4NTI "n9ogl" wrote in message oups.com... To do what with? To spew your "opinions". That is NOT a bulletin Toad. I see dan you didn't read my post or you snipped it because the fact is I'm tell the truth and you don't want to hear the truth. Like I've said many times before you show me an FCC rule or a final order from the FCC that say's an Information bulletin can't be opinionated, the truth is there is none, I know it and all the other morons on this newsgroup know it but they don't have the balls to admit to it. the both line is your all so narrow-minded that you can't look outside your little box. All you have to do is read and do research, but you moron on this newsgroup either don't want to or can't Todd N9OGL THE N9OGL BBS http://n9ogl.proboards50.com/index.cgi? |
You really are a dumbass ain't ya Toad? I never use or have used a
anonymous remailer. I always sign my name and call. I want you to be sure you know its from me. Just look at this header. That's me. Dan/W4NTI "n9ogl" wrote in message oups.com... Tell me Toad, what has CB got to do with this discussion? Other than the obvious fact that it is where you learned all you "know" about Amateur Radio. And FYI I am one of the very few Amateurs that never played on CB. Other than when I fixed the pieces of crap and got a radio check....and immediatly turned it off. Oh we know where your coming from dan, this was sent to my email today.... From: "Dan/W4NTI" Add to Address Book To: Subject: [The Voice of Amateur Radio] 7/19/2005 04:27:14 PM Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Todd, stop posting pictures of girls when you know that you squealed in ecstasy when I put my dick deep in your ass and made you cum three times in a row and stain your mother's kitchen table cloth. It was good and I want to do it again. I'm even touching myself as I type this. your lover, Dan W4NTI -- Posted by Dan/W4NTI to The Voice of Amateur Radio at 7/19/2005 04:27:14 PM HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Todd N9OGL |
Dan/W4NTI wrote: You really are a dumbass ain't ya Toad? I never use or have used a anonymous remailer. I always sign my name and call. I want you to be sure you know its from me. Just look at this header. That's me. good greif "this is me" and claiming you have used a remailer this is a claim you intend to prove how? Dan/W4NTI "n9ogl" wrote in message oups.com... Tell me Toad, what has CB got to do with this discussion? Other than the obvious fact that it is where you learned all you "know" about Amateur Radio. And FYI I am one of the very few Amateurs that never played on CB. Other than when I fixed the pieces of crap and got a radio check....and immediatly turned it off. Oh we know where your coming from dan, this was sent to my email today.... From: "Dan/W4NTI" Add to Address Book To: Subject: [The Voice of Amateur Radio] 7/19/2005 04:27:14 PM Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2005 16:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Todd, stop posting pictures of girls when you know that you squealed in ecstasy when I put my dick deep in your ass and made you cum three times in a row and stain your mother's kitchen table cloth. It was good and I want to do it again. I'm even touching myself as I type this. your lover, Dan W4NTI -- Posted by Dan/W4NTI to The Voice of Amateur Radio at 7/19/2005 04:27:14 PM HAHAHAHAHAHAHA Todd N9OGL |
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: You really are a dumbass ain't ya Toad? I never use or have used a anonymous remailer. I always sign my name and call. I want you to be sure you know its from me. Just look at this header. That's me. good greif "this is me" and claiming you have used a remailer this is a claim you intend to prove how? Dan/W4NTI Do some searching. Dan is NOT the culprit. Stoopid Todd is intellectually challenged and has not any idea that perhaps another is "dummying" the posts. Toddie...it is a good bet that your butt buddie, Roger Wiseman, is behind the bogus signups. And if Wiseman is not the responsible party, that leaves one other suspect. W4*** is not above making trouble, either. Rogie likes you, Todd. Rogie likes anybody who takes it up the back door. |
Opie wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: You really are a dumbass ain't ya Toad? I never use or have used a anonymous remailer. I always sign my name and call. I want you to be sure you know its from me. Just look at this header. That's me. good greif "this is me" and claiming you have used a remailer this is a claim you intend to prove how? Dan/W4NTI break Do some searching. Dan is NOT the culprit. Stoopid Todd is intellectually challenged and has not any idea that perhaps another is "dummying" the posts. Dan may be or plenty of other but anybody standing up and claiming his is me and that I never use remailers is prime choice Todd knows there is plenty of fakery around so I do Toddie...it is a good bet that your butt buddie, Roger Wiseman, is behind the bogus signups. And if Wiseman is not the responsible party, that leaves one other suspect. W4*** is not above making trouble, either. Rogie likes you, Todd. Rogie likes anybody who takes it up the back door. |
Opie wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... Dan/W4NTI wrote: You really are a dumbass ain't ya Toad? I never use or have used a anonymous remailer. I always sign my name and call. I want you to be sure you know its from me. Just look at this header. That's me. good greif "this is me" and claiming you have used a remailer this is a claim you intend to prove how? Tell us why *you* sent it via the reamailer. Dan/W4NTI Do some searching. Dan is NOT the culprit. Stoopid Todd is intellectually challenged and has not any idea that perhaps another is "dummying" the ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ posts. While you obviously need no help on that score. Toddie...it is a good bet that your butt buddie, Roger Wiseman, is behind the bogus signups. And if Wiseman is not the responsible party, that leaves one other suspect. W4*** is not above making trouble, either. Poor thing. Roger owns you so badly. Rogie likes you, Todd. Rogie likes anybody who takes it up the back door. But you take it up the back door more often, and since your daddy first initiated it into the "family tradition." |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:57 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com