ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?

SC

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??

Todd N9OGL

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why? - n9oglloser.JPG (0/1)
 

On 23 Mar 2006 14:44:06 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??

Todd N9OGL

Ths is what a REALLY DUMB one looks like while living in his parents
basement........................................





_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Slow Code wrote:
Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?
trool troll troll you boat gently down the air

SC

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Slow Code wrote:
Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?

SC

"Hello..."

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why? - n9oglloser.JPG (0/1)
 

SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
On 23 Mar 2006 14:44:06 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??

Todd N9OGL

Ths is what a REALLY DUMB one looks like while living in his parents
basement........................................

What is even DUMBER is a ham you can't pass the General or the 5 wpm
Code test after over 12 years of trying like you have, Davies. And you
want the FCC to accomodate you by lowering the standards of the test so
you can finally pass them.

get help)
 

wrote:
SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
On 23 Mar 2006 14:44:06 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??


.. And you
want the FCC to accomodate you by lowering the standards of the test so
you can finally pass them.

nah to end the code test

you keep missing the point

gte help

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:


Slow Code wrote:
Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?

SC

"Hello..."


Breaker Breaker...

ah yes the terror of the "dreded CBer"

grow up

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:

Slow Code wrote:
Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?

SC

"Hello..."

Breaker Breaker...

"Hello..."

get help)
 

sucked off an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
On 23 Mar 2006 14:44:06 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??


. And you
want the FCC to accomodate you by lowering the standards of the test so
you can finally pass them.

nah to end the code test

BWHAHAHAhA What a moron and a loser, you can't even pass the 5 wpm test
for it.

you keep missing the point

You always miss the point, you retard.

gte help

No, GTE is part of Verizon, stupid.

get help)
 

wrote:
sucked off an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
On 23 Mar 2006 14:44:06 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??


. And you
want the FCC to accomodate you by lowering the standards of the test so
you can finally pass them.

nah to end the code test

BWHAHAHAhA What a moron and a loser, you can't even pass the 5 wpm test
for it.
so that is being handled

but you still can't tell the truth about anything that I cans see

get help

get help)
 

sodomized an little boy wrote:
wrote:
sucked off an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:
On 23 Mar 2006 14:44:06 -0800, "N9OGL" wrote:

why dumber hams? how are they dumb??


. And you
want the FCC to accomodate you by lowering the standards of the test so
you can finally pass them.

nah to end the code test

BWHAHAHAhA What a moron and a loser, you can't even pass the 5 wpm test
for it.
so that is being handled

The only thing you handle is your neighbor boy's dick in yoru hand.

but you still can't tell the truth about anything that I cans see

That's rich, coming from a self-admitted liar like you.
Die of your AIDS.

get help)
 

wrote:
sodomized an little boy wrote:
wrote:
sucked off an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:


but you still can't tell the truth about anything that I cans see

That's rich, coming from a self-admitted liar like you.

you are a proven liar foracbly outed as one
Die of your AIDS.

like that lie

get help

get help)
 

assraped an underaged kid wrote:
wrote:
sodomized an little boy wrote:
wrote:
sucked off an Old friend wrote:
wrote:
SECWET Lisping cocksucker Lloyd wrote:


but you still can't tell the truth about anything that I cans see

That's rich, coming from a self-admitted liar like you.

you are a proven liar foracbly outed as one

No, that would be you, Marky. You were busted as a liar big time.

Die of your AIDS.

like that lie

It's not a lie, child raper. You do have AIDS.

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:

Slow Code wrote:
Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?

SC

"Hello..."

Breaker Breaker...

"Hello..."

I guess "Slow Code" Dan isn't an ARRL member.

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
ups.com:


wrote:

I guess "Slow Code" Dan isn't an ARRL member.



Ten-Nine Good-buddy? Breaker, Breaker, You a product of out-come based
licensing?
"You a product "

I was a member for many many years,
I am glad the hear that

now run along and get help for your misanthropism

"Hello..." ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
ups.com:
wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
oups.com:
Slow Code wrote:

Is it because they think they can get more money with dumber hams?

SC

"Hello..."

Breaker Breaker...

"Hello..."

I guess "Slow Code" Dan isn't an ARRL member.

Ten-Nine Good-buddy? Breaker, Breaker, You a product of out-come based
licensing?

"Hello..."

I guess you missed out on the ARRL's campaign to bring more amateurs on
board.

I was a member for many many years, but I dumped them nine years ago when
they started pushing their proposals to dumb things down.

I always thought the code was doing enough to dumb down the service.

I want those
assholes to give me my dues money back now. I didn't pay them to screw
everything up.

BTW, I'm not Dan.

SC

In the April 2006 editorial by David Sumner, K1ZZ, David introduces the
concept of "Hello."

And in the 8th paragraph, he validates something I've said and have
been blasted for again and again. I've said that you almost have to
know a ham to become a ham. And I've said it again and again and again
despite the attacks from the Extra-Elite that storm the halls of RRAP.


Here are David's exact words:

"The best place to start is with the people closest to you. Most of us
were introduced to Amateur Radio by friends and family, or by someone
once removed - the friend of a friend. Oh, we might have read a book
or seen an article or some television coverage about Amateur Radio, but
it took the personal touch to turn that glimmer of interest into a
passion. It took someone's helping hand to guide us through the maze
of unfamiliar terms, baffling regulations and arcane procedures. Now
it's our turn."

Now David Sumner, K1ZZ, speaking for the ARRL in QST magazine validates
what I've said and have been attacked for saying.

Did David say, "Most of us were introduced to Amateur Radio by friends
and family, or by someone once removed - the friend of a friend???"
Yes, he did.

Did David say "baffling regulations???" Yes, he did.

Well, I didn't need David's validation. I knew I was speaking the
truth all along.

This is funny, coming right on the heels of the FCC validating what
they think the true worth of the ARS.

"Hello..." ARRL not wanting to help impove the service. Why?
 

wrote:
Slow Code wrote:
wrote in
ups.com:
wrote:
Slow Code wrote:

I was a member for many many years, but I dumped them nine years ago when
they started pushing their proposals to dumb things down.

I always thought the code was doing enough to dumb down the service.

indeed
breifity cut
Now David Sumner, K1ZZ, speaking for the ARRL in QST magazine validates
what I've said and have been attacked for saying.

Did David say, "Most of us were introduced to Amateur Radio by friends
and family, or by someone once removed - the friend of a friend???"
Yes, he did.

Did David say "baffling regulations???" Yes, he did.

Well, I didn't need David's validation. I knew I was speaking the
truth all along.

but suley it is nice (and good fro Hamr Radio) that he may in fact have
a glimer of the truth

This is funny, coming right on the heels of the FCC validating what
they think the true worth of the ARS.

indeed the wake up call is both needed and clearly unheeded by many in
the ARS