Hi-Q Ceramic Caps?
Hello All!
Bare with me, I'm a newbie. I'm looking into building the Radio Shack Special http://www.electronics-lab.com/projects/rf/007/ And looking through the parts list, I see that he references using Hi-Q Ceramic Capacitors. This radio is for FM, so 90-110mhz. I have a bunch of normal ceramic capacitors, but no hi-q capacitors. Is there really much of a difference between the two, or am I likely to fail if I don't use them? I'd hate to solder all this onto a board, and risk messing up the board when removing them. Any advice on the difference between them would be helpful. I'm guessing they oscillate better, or at higher frequencies. |
Hi-Q Ceramic Caps?
On 29 Aug 2006 14:57:19 -0700, "SparkySKO"
wrote: Hello All! Bare with me, I'm a newbie. Only if you're female. |
Hi-Q Ceramic Caps?
Wes Stewart wrote: On 29 Aug 2006 14:57:19 -0700, "SparkySKO" wrote: Hello All! Bare with me, I'm a newbie. Only if you're female. Okay okay, bear with me.. Sorry, I went to a public school. |
Hi-Q Ceramic Caps?
For the 5 pF and 15 pF capacitors, use only NPO (C0G) ceramic capacitors
-- otherwise the frequency will drift. For just receiving FM broadcast, you *might* get by with "stable" ceramic caps, like X7R, since the signals are broad. But try to get NPO if you can. For the other capacitors, use ones which are physically small. Multilayer ceramic capacitors are smaller than disks. Get some solder wick, which is a wire braid soaked with flux. To remove components, first remove the solder with the wick, then you can pull the components out without damaging the board. Any beginner's board that won't tolerate removal of parts is crap and shouldn't be on the market. Roy Lewallen, W7EL SparkySKO wrote: Hello All! Bare with me, I'm a newbie. I'm looking into building the Radio Shack Special http://www.electronics-lab.com/projects/rf/007/ And looking through the parts list, I see that he references using Hi-Q Ceramic Capacitors. This radio is for FM, so 90-110mhz. I have a bunch of normal ceramic capacitors, but no hi-q capacitors. Is there really much of a difference between the two, or am I likely to fail if I don't use them? I'd hate to solder all this onto a board, and risk messing up the board when removing them. Any advice on the difference between them would be helpful. I'm guessing they oscillate better, or at higher frequencies. |
Hi-Q Ceramic Caps?
Actually, modern ceramic capacitors generally are pretty high Q, though
I wonder if the "Hi-Q" may be a trademarked name. The problem, as Roy suggests, is more likely to be temperature stability, and as he says, the 5pF and 15pF parts in the design are the ones to be careful about. I'd guess you will have a very hard time finding 5pF and 15pF capacitors which are NOT either temperature stable (NPO or C0G type) or controlled coefficient (negative or positive temperature coefficient, typically used to compensate for drift in coils...since a coil typically expands with increased temperature, its inductance goes up, and that can be compensated by a capacitor whose capacitance goes down). The dielectrics which are not stable, like X7R, Y5V and Z5U, are used in high capacitance parts, and looking at a couple manufacturers' data sheets, the smallest value X7R I see is 100pF. If the capacitor is large enough, it may be marked "NPO" or "N220" or something similar to let you know its temperature characteristic. In the RF part of the circuit, especially, keeping lead lengths very short is important. You don't want the part that's supposed to be a capacitor also include a lot of inductance. There are ceramic capacitors which are specially designed for use at UHF and microwave frequencies, and maintain very high Q up into GHz frequencies, but you shouldn't need anything like that. Also, be aware that "5pF" is deprecated: modern parts are much more likely to be in the standard "e12" sequence: 1.0, 1.2, 1.5, 1.8, 2.2, 2.7, 3.3, 3.9, 4.7, 5.6, 6.8, 8.2, 10, ... So for the "5pF" you'd use a 4.7pF part (and probably not notice the difference at all). Another note: I notice the instructions you referenced say to use a form for the source coil that's EXACTLY 8mm diameter. I'm confident that if you use one that's 5/16" diameter, you won't notice the difference. In fact, if you use one that's 1/4" diameter and wind it with 32 turns of close-wound 24 AWG enamelled wire, it's very likely to work just as well. You could also use a 2.2uH commercial RF inductor. So maybe you were only baring your soul... Cheers, Tom SparkySKO wrote: Hello All! Bare with me, I'm a newbie. I'm looking into building the Radio Shack Special http://www.electronics-lab.com/projects/rf/007/ And looking through the parts list, I see that he references using Hi-Q Ceramic Capacitors. This radio is for FM, so 90-110mhz. I have a bunch of normal ceramic capacitors, but no hi-q capacitors. Is there really much of a difference between the two, or am I likely to fail if I don't use them? I'd hate to solder all this onto a board, and risk messing up the board when removing them. Any advice on the difference between them would be helpful. I'm guessing they oscillate better, or at higher frequencies. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:56 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com