LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #12   Report Post  
Old September 8th 06, 06:25 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Intermediate Frequency

AndyS wrote:

Andy writes:
This is the eighth response to your question. All of the others
are accurate. HOWEVER, there is one technical problem with
a homodyne that outweighs the previous resonses...

The L.O, has to be EXACTLY the same frequency as the incoming
signal to provide proper demodulation......

With a superhet, depending on the modulation, you can be
many Khz in error ( for AM) or a few dozen off ( for voice SSB).
With homodyne, you may have to process a psuedo-baseband signal which
has frequency components you don't want..... that is a bitch....

In order to achieve the LO to be EXACTLY the same
frequency (phase doesn't matter since you can use I and Q),
it is necessary to achieve frequency lock. That requires a
much higher S/N than a simple superhet with a detector...
So you lose sensitivity. In some systems , you can lock
to a remote carrier, but you aren't really talking about those
methods, I don't. think....

So, the major technical problem is not SIMPLICITY or
BANDWIDTH or NUMBER OF STAGES...,.. it is
how to obtain an LO of the correct frequency.... All the
other problems are simple compared to this.... for most systems...

Andy W4OAH

PS I welcome dissent and would like very much to learn
if anything I have said is in error......


I believe that what you said is true, but only for AM. What other kind
of modulation requires better frequency accuracy from a direct
conversion receiver LO than from a superhet LO? I believe that only a
small fraction of today's amateurs are interested in AM reception, but
of course it's the bread and butter of the SWL and BCL.

I've build direct conversion receivers for many years. Their simplicity
is particularly evident when you compare a transceiver having a direct
conversion receiver with one having a superhet receiver -- to be honest,
be sure to include all the extra filtering necessary with the superhet.
The single biggest disadvantage to DC receivers, in my opinion, is the
difficulty of making a good AGC, particularly in conjunction with narrow
audio bandwidth. And they do have their own set of potential problems,
such as unintended AM demodulation, the effects of LO leakage and
radiation, and the difficulties in making a clean, stable, high gain
audio amplifier. But all can be overcome once one understands the causes
of the problems. All but perhaps the last one will be present in a
digital version, too, so a casually designed and/or built one is likely
to be a poor performer.

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When does channel changing DSSS become hybrid DSSS/FHSS? [email protected] Policy 4 December 24th 05 02:10 PM
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! GeorgeF Scanner 1 May 13th 04 09:37 PM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 GeorgeF Scanner 1 September 13th 03 04:10 AM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 GeorgeF Shortwave 0 September 12th 03 03:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017