Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Sep 2006 13:17:19 -0700, "radio_rookie"
wrote: Hello, I want to know the importance of intermediate frequency in any receivers. IF was used in Superhet transceivers. My question is why doesn't anyone use zero IF now a days. What is the problem of brining the RF signal directly to baseband? Images of the same signal may be a source of interference. Does the IF stage conditions the incoming signal? Yes, in many ways. The most significant are amplification and selectivity. What are the advantages of the IF stage? Less amplification needed at the recieved frequency. Gain at a frequency removed from the recieved frequency. Selectivity is easier to obtain at lower frequencies. Gain control can be applied if needed. Allison |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When does channel changing DSSS become hybrid DSSS/FHSS? | Policy | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Shortwave |