LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #20   Report Post  
Old September 9th 06, 04:13 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 3
Default Intermediate Frequency

wrote:

On 7 Sep 2006 13:17:19 -0700, "radio_rookie"
wrote:

Hello,
I want to know the importance of intermediate frequency in any
receivers. IF was used in Superhet transceivers. My question is why
doesn't anyone use zero IF now a days.


What is the problem of brining
the RF signal directly to baseband?


Images of the same signal may be a source of interference.

Does the IF stage conditions the incoming signal?


Yes, in many ways. The most significant are amplification
and selectivity.

What are the advantages of the IF stage?


Less amplification needed at the recieved frequency.
Gain at a frequency removed from the recieved frequency.
Selectivity is easier to obtain at lower frequencies.
Gain control can be applied if needed.

Allison


I can easily agree that an IF amp's job is to cleanly
and efficiently amplify a specific, modulated, carrier frequency
and to allow for gain control feedback.

But I don't see how "selectivity" should be considered a
function of an IF amp (other than they're not amplifying
what they shouldn't amplify).

It seems easier to think of "selectivity" as a property of
a tuner or several tuner stages.

It's hard for me to think of IF "stages" as improving tuner selectivity
when my homebrew 40m DC recvr seems to be selective enough
so that when I listen to CW the pitch will not change audibly.
The frequency may fluctuate a little, but certainly not enough to
loose a signal, and it does not drift monotonically enough to
worry about (except perhaps as a matter of pride).

The superhet's conversion mixers/filters/amps seem to be
considered sub-steps of "IF stages", but I find it easier to
think of the mixer/filter steps as "stages of tuners interlaced
with IF amplifier stages".

Since the final conversion step may represent a detection,
the idea of "selectivity" as being interlaced with IF amps
has a more tidy representation in my mind.

Comments, criticisms, corrections, caveats - are always welcome.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
When does channel changing DSSS become hybrid DSSS/FHSS? [email protected] Policy 4 December 24th 05 02:10 PM
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) Jon Noring Shortwave 103 June 30th 04 07:13 PM
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! GeorgeF Scanner 1 May 13th 04 09:37 PM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 GeorgeF Scanner 1 September 13th 03 04:10 AM
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 GeorgeF Shortwave 0 September 12th 03 03:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017