Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael Black" schrieb im Newsbeitrag ... "Henry Kiefer" ) writes: Everywhere I read about the necessity to remove AM. If the band is used for FM only, why then remove the not found AM in it? The limiting has nothing to do with receiving FM, it has everything to do with getting rid of QRN. Armstrong pursued FM because he wanted some system that was more noise free than AM. Since FM does not have an amplitude componenet, that means you can limit to clear out the QRN and some of the fading. The limiting is what makes FM so appealling. Take out the limiter and the FM demodulator will still work fine, but there'll be little point in switching to FM. OK Michael. So it is for fight against QRN and fading, not primary for being immune to AM. As my Spice simulations suggest; the FM demodulator works almost completely comparable in analog (=not limiting) and digital (=limiting) mode. What about the performance comparision of PLL demod and quadrature demod concepts? Seems no much difference? regards - Henry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
When does channel changing DSSS become hybrid DSSS/FHSS? | Policy | |||
Channel-based AM tube tuner (was Designs for a single frequency high performance AM-MW receiver?) | Shortwave | |||
MilAir Monitoring from KeyWest - Lots of Comms! | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Scanner | |||
North-Central Florida Mil Logs 9/10/2003 & 9/11/2003 | Shortwave |