Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dee:
England feared granting us independence and the right to govern ourselves, frankly, they were correct; we have been a problem ever since! Warmest regards, JS "Dee Flint" wrote in message ... "Paul Keinanen" wrote in message ... On Sat, 09 Dec 2006 01:25:01 GMT, Slow Code wrote: No, the bands are going to get worse over the long haul. We got people that don't want to be skilled knowledgable hams. If they're too lazy to learn CW they are going to be too lazy to learn other things too. Technical discussions will decline. It will start to sound like CB. From the European perspective, I do not understand this discussion. Most European countries (except Russia) removed the CW requirement after a few months of the ITU WRC decision that CW test is not required at frequencies below 30 MHz. I haven't observed any problems with persons using the HF bands without the CW test. Listen for yourself, can you tell which European operator has passed the CW test and which one has not passed the test. Paul OH3LWR Other countries are not a problem. Personally I do not attempt to predict what will happen in the US. However some fear that with easy licensing and the lax enforcement here that there could potentially be serious problems. They fear a repetition of what happened to the Citizens Band here. With little to no enforcement of violations, that band became such a sewer that you don't dare let kids listen to it. Recently two CB operators got into a fight over the radio, sought each other out, and one was killed. It is not the world we fear but ourselves. Dee, N8UZE |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
another place the fruit can't post | Policy | |||
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio? | Antenna | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Doing Battle? Can't Resist Posting? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | General |