LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 06, 11:12 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.homebrew
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 154
Default Ideal ham receiver


Then later, some rigs used PLLs. I can't remember if the Signal One
used one, but certainly in the seventies they came along. Same basic
idea as the premixer, but the PLL was the filter so the VCO directly
fed the receiver's first mixer.


Michael VE2BVW


Well the CX-7 didn't use a PLL, but the CX-11 did. It was however only for
generating a comb frequency to be used with premixing. The analog PTO's
still tuned 3.1 to 4.1 MHz.

The main problem with up conversion is the hit you take on oscillator phase
noise. These days, with the advent of the "H" mode mixer, oscillator phase
noise and birdies are THE limiting factor in receiver compromise.

W4ZCB


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS DX-394 General Coverage Receiver Hammer Scanner 0 September 14th 04 10:48 PM
FS:Conar Twins - Conar 500 Receiver & Conar 400 Xmtr Dave Hollander Swap 0 December 8th 03 03:35 AM
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP David Black Equipment 0 July 21st 03 11:09 PM
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP David Black Equipment 0 July 21st 03 11:09 PM
FS: Icom R75 Receiver w/DSP David Black Swap 0 July 21st 03 11:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017