Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
Personally, I'd experiment with the AD9951 DDS chip, it's spurious outputs are very low.... http://www.radioamatore.it/i0cg/add9951.html However, if somebody wants a DDS for direct conversion experiments, the AD9854 DDS has built in quadrature outputs which make it tempting. This website discusses a complete design and, the kit can be gotten from Kanga. It is pricy, but in my opinion, it has everything I would need..... http://home.comcast.net/~aa0zz/index.html The only drawback is that it's spurious outputs are higher. Jim Pennell N6BIU If you want quadrature LO signals, and you are operating below half (or ideally below quarter) of the DDS maximum output frequency, then you might find that the best approach is to use the cleanest DDS chip that you can find with a single output, then filter that to remove the harmonics, DAC images etc. and then square it up with a LVDS receiver or comparator, and divide by 2 or 4 using the flipflops of the divider to generate quadrature. The challenging part would be ensuring that propagation delays don't spoil the quadrature, but it probably wouldn't be any harder than making two matched re-construction filters to use with an I-Q DDS chip. The fact that you end up with quadrature square waves rather than quadrature sine waves is a good thing (not a disadvantage at all) with most kinds of mixer. Chris |