Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 31, 5:43 pm, cliff wright wrote:
Andrew VK3BFA wrote: On Oct 25, 1:27 pm, cliff wright wrote: Well I've got all my TX problems sorted out fine now. However I am beginning to think that the receiver is somewhat noisy. When set up as per manual I am getting about a S3 internal noise level on sideband. My unit has had the RF stage modified as per the International Radio mods and also the balanced mixer. In the next few days I hope to have a look at this problem too, it is possible that the mixer balance is not very perfect for example. It was also fitted with back to back 1N4148 diodes across the RX input and these might just have been damaged with the tx problem. Has anyone else had a similar experience with this rig? Regards Cliff Wright ZL1BDA ex G3NIA. Remove ALL the mods. Take it back to original - that way, you will be looking for a fault rather than trying to figure out if its the mods, faulty mods, something else, etc etc. The original design engineers had a pretty good idea of how it was supposed to work, published specifications in the manual, are based on this. Your battling with "mods" - how can find any fault with extraneous mods? Get an established reference point, ie the service manual. Go forward from there..... Andrew VK3BFA. Hi Andrew. Well I ran it for over a year before making the modifications. These were basically using more advanced MOSFET's in the rf and balanced mixer stages with some bias adjustments to suit. From my measurements (I have a pretty well equipped home electronics workshop) it did make some improvement to the internal noise floor and about a 6 to 10 dB improvement in overload capacity. I must actually beg to differ a little about the original design engineers. As I pointed out the 820S was produced with a least 5 different 1st mixer source circuits in production and the coupling to the balanced mixer is not optimum by any means. This doesn't look to me like a fully optimised design! BTW I did actually restore things the way they were and it just went back the way it was, and the noise was still there. Perhaps I should point out that I have designed and built 10 different communication receivers in the last 40 years and have owned most of the well known older commercial units too, in fact in the late 1970s I worked 200 countries confirmed and got my WAC with a completely homebrew station running 100 watts to a TT21 final. Further investigation has confirmed so far that we have a serious local problem with mains radiated QRN here. Some experiments the other evening showed that the noise has decided polarisation characteristics as a 5/8 wave 20 metre vertical produces a similar noise level to my G5RV but with greater impulsive characteristics, a bit like auto ignition noise. The jury is still out but fortunately another local ham works for the power distribution company and I'm going to get in contact with him to s share our experiences. Very dissapointing though as I have a nice elevated site and had great hopes of getting some good DX. I'll post anything I find out further. 73's Cliff Wright ZL1BDA ex G3NIA I stand corrected - it was from my own experience of fixing other peoples radios where a bizarre collection of "mods" had degraded the actual performance!. But, as you point out, you have the test gear and the knowledge to eliminate this. In the end, its going to be something very simple (isnt it always?) and possibly related to an error made while doing something else in there........(been there, done that - still drives me NUTS!!!) Andrew VK3BFA. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS. Kenwood TS -820S | Swap | |||
FS Kenwood TS-820S | Swap | |||
FA: Kenwood TS-820S | Equipment | |||
FA: Kenwood TS-820S | Equipment | |||
FS: Kenwood TS-820S | Swap |