|
VoiceMax Speech Processor
The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone...
It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. VoiceMax is no gimmick... it uses proven AGC technology to produce tangible results. Want to know more? http://tinyurl.com/2ac9r5 |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Stev eH
What has a ready made module got to do with home brew? Steve H Nothing, it's just Griffeys' spam through google again. (need a processor on your CB? contact Brian in his moms basement) Otherwise killfilter voicemax. No one wanted his 11 meter amplifier either, so he finally stopped that spam. 73 Steve. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
What has a ready made module got to do with home brew?
Steve H SteveH, it has everything to do with home brew... if your goal is to substantially increase the performance of your rig. www.telstar-electronics.com |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Tel star Electronics
wrote: What has a ready made module got to do with home brew? Steve H SteveH, it has everything to do with home brew... if your goal is to substantially increase the performance of your rig. www.telstar-electronics.com Most people would build one rather than buy one and many would even design one based on RF processing as this would be far better for amateur use. You would be far better off targeting gullible CB users. Steve H |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Stev eH wrote:
Tel star Electronics wrote: What has a ready made module got to do with home brew? Steve H Actually, those little voice recorder modules that Radio Shack used to sell (don't know if they still do) was used in my homebrew 2M foxhunt transmitter for voice ID on FM... Scott |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Most people would build one rather than buy one and many would even
design one based on RF processing as this would be far better for amateur use. You would be far better off targeting gullible CB users. Steve H SteveH, sorry you have such a low opinion of CB operators... I don't believe they think much of you either... lol www.telstar-electronics.com |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics
wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
cmdr buzz corey wrote:
On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. In looking closely at his photos, it appears his circuit is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 (product data: http://tinyurl.com/6eadpn). The specifications indicate it *can* be operated cleanly. Of course, to set it up requires at least an oscilloscope... which many hams don't own (or know how to use). Based on the photos I've seen, I wouldn't buy one because of the poor soldering: http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php..._122_173lo.jpg. I'll just continue to use my 2-tube (2x 3-500Z) speech "processor": http://www.rigpix.com/linears/sb220.htm Bryan WA7PRC |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 25, 1:29*am, "Bryan" wrote:
cmdr buzz corey wrote: On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. In looking closely at his photos, it appears his circuit is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 (product data:http://tinyurl.com/6eadpn). *The specifications indicate it *can* be operated cleanly. *Of course, to set it up requires at least an oscilloscope... which many hams don't own (or know how to use). Based on the photos I've seen, I wouldn't buy one because of the poor soldering:http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php..._122_173lo.jpg. I'll just continue to use my 2-tube (2x 3-500Z) speech "processor":http://www.rigpix.com/linears/sb220.htm Bryan WA7PRC WA7PRC, you are absolutely correct that the design is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 chip. I'm curious about your soldering comment. Why do you feel the soldering is poor? We have not had a single failure due to poor soldering. We have approximately 400 units in the field at this time. The field failure is around 0.2% during the one year period that these units have been on the market. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Telstar Electronics wrote:
WA7PRC, you are absolutely correct that the design is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 chip. I'm curious about your soldering comment. Why do you feel the soldering is poor? We have not had a single failure due to poor soldering. We have approximately 400 units in the field at this time. The field failure is around 0.2% during the one year period that these units have been on the market. ======= That would mean that only 1 of the 400 units had failed in the field. Is that correct ? Frank KN6WH |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Telstar Electronics wrote:
Bryan wrote: cmdr buzz corey wrote: On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. In looking closely at his photos, it appears his circuit is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 (product data:http://tinyurl.com/6eadpn). The specifications indicate it *can* be operated cleanly. Of course, to set it up requires at least an oscilloscope... which many hams don't own (or know how to use). Based on the photos I've seen, I wouldn't buy one because of the poor soldering:http://img105.imagevenue.com/img.php..._122_173lo.jpg. I'll just continue to use my 2-tube (2x 3-500Z) speech "processor":http://www.rigpix.com/linears/sb220.htm Bryan WA7PRC WA7PRC, you are absolutely correct that the design is based on the Analog Devices SSM2166 chip. I'm curious about your soldering comment. Why do you feel the soldering is poor? We have not had a single failure due to poor soldering. We have approximately 400 units in the field at this time. The field failure is around 0.2% during the one year period that these units have been on the market. According the photo (http://i17.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/cb/2d/2695_1.JPG) that I found on a certain well-known auction site, all but a few solder joints had what I call "reverse fillets". The solder connections should have a concave shape but instead have a convex shape (too much solder). The few that didn't appeared to be overheated, with a grainy appearance. I hate to say so but, though you've had a low failure rate, they definitely wouldn't pass scrutiny to meet Mil, CGMP, ISO, or IPC standards. Bryan WA7PRC |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
That would mean that only 1 of the 400 units had failed in the field.
Is that correct ? Frank * * * KN6WH Absolutely correct Frank... and the failure was not a soldering issue. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
According the photo (http://i17.ebayimg.com/06/i/000/cb/2d/
2695_1.JPG) that I found on a certain well-known auction site, all but a few solder joints had what I call "reverse fillets". *The solder connections should have a concave shape but instead have a convex shape (too much solder). * The few that didn't appeared to be overheated, with a grainy appearance. *I hate to say so but, though you've had a low failure rate, they definitely wouldn't pass scrutiny to meet Mil, CGMP, ISO, or IPC standards. Bryan WA7PRC You are right about possibly having too much solder... but that is certainly not a reliability issue. Grainy appearance of some joints is not uncommon for the new RoHS (high-concentration of tin) solders. As for passing military specs... that was never our intention with this product. Thanks for your comments. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
"cmdr buzz corey" wrote in message ... On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. LOL. His website claims that Mouser Electronics is a "partner." Searches on Mouser for "Telstar" and "VoiceMax" return zero results. Hmm. . does buying some parts from Mouser make them a "partner." If so, I'm a "partner" with Mouser, too. LOL LOL |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
His website claims that Mouser Electronics is a "partner." *Searches on
Mouser for "Telstar" and "VoiceMax" return zero results. *Hmm. . does buying some parts from Mouser make them a "partner." *If so, I'm a "partner" with Mouser, too. The dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." So yes, in your example... you would be a partner of Mouser. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Tel star Electronics
wrote: His website claims that Mouser Electronics is a "partner." Searches on Mouser for "Telstar" and "VoiceMax" return zero results. Hmm. . does buying some parts from Mouser make them a "partner." If so, I'm a "partner" with Mouser, too. The dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." So yes, in your example... you would be a partner of Mouser. If I advertised that my company was a partner with HP (we bought the computers from them) and Kenco I think they may object ....... Steve H |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
If I advertised that my company was a partner with HP (we bought the
computers from them) and Kenco I think they may object ....... Steve H Well... I can't speak for your business... but my partners are overjoyed that they are mentioned and have links available to their sites. www.telstar-electronics.com |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Tel star Electronics
wrote: If I advertised that my company was a partner with HP (we bought the computers from them) and Kenco I think they may object ....... Steve H Well... I can't speak for your business... but my partners are overjoyed that they are mentioned and have links available to their sites. www.telstar-electronics.com I bet they don't have a link to your site;c) Steve H |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
I bet they don't have a link to your site;c)
Steve H That's entirely up to them... www.telstar-electronics.com |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 27, 5:00 pm, Telstar Electronics
wrote: I bet they don't have a link to your site;c) Steve H That's entirely up to them...www.telstar-electronics.com So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 28, 11:12*pm, cmdr buzz corey
wrote: te a life oh cancelled cartoon buy his product if you want it or not if you don't |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you
splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 29, 9:44*am, Telstar Electronics
wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
JIMMIE wrote:
On Nov 29, 9:44=A0am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Oh no, are you going to report him to Mouser? -- http://NewsReader.Com/ |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, JIMMIE wrote: Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:34:31 -0800 (PST) From: JIMMIE Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: VoiceMax Speech Processor On Nov 29, 9:44*am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Maybe not "informed" but ask people THERE, at Mouser, what their "definition" of _partner_ is and then tell them about this guy. "Dictionary" definitions should not be confused with word usage within contexts that alter the meaning of words. For example, the word _sterilize_ has a different meaning in banking/finance compared to microbiology. In a business context, "partners" generally implies that an ongoing relationship exists by virtue of a written contract. If party A buys parts from party B, and pays for those parts with money, that establishes a provider-customer relationship, not a partnership. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Rectifier wrote: Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 12:56:20 -0600 From: Rectifier Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: VoiceMax Speech Processor "cmdr buzz corey" wrote in message ... On Nov 14, 5:13 am, Telstar Electronics wrote: The VoiceMax speech processor is not for everyone... It's only for radio operators that want maximum range from their rig. Along with maximum splatter. LOL. His website claims that Mouser Electronics is a "partner." Searches on Mouser for "Telstar" and "VoiceMax" return zero results. Hmm. . does buying some parts from Mouser make them a "partner." If so, I'm a "partner" with Mouser, too. LOL LOL I have their 2008 sept-oct catalog and "Telstar" is not listed in the supplier index at the end. Does Telstar provide any kind of study data that defines what "maximum range from their rig" actually means? And documents that the processor actually does something measurably beneficial at the receive end? |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 29, 5:42*pm, Steve wrote:
JIMMIE wrote: On Nov 29, 9:44=A0am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Oh no, are you going to report him to Mouser? -- * * * * * * * * *http://NewsReader.Com/- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The last I heard a partnership required a legal agreement between two or more parties agreeing to be parters. It may be a case of the powers that be at Mouser asking themselves "Can I make more money off of Telstar by doing business with or by taking legal actioon against Telstar". I once had a similar complaint lodged against me when I had my own business because my sign and letterhead read ....serving in partnership with a well known electronics supply firm. I manage to get away with it because they had sent me a letter after I had opened my account with them stating how they "anticipated serving in partnership with my business". I had based my shingle on this quote. Jimmie |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
There are no federal laws in the USA governing partnerships. It may be covered by some state law where Mouser is incorporated. The issue is trademark infringement. Something most companies take quite seriously. Stray Dog wrote in r.org: On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, JIMMIE wrote: Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:34:31 -0800 (PST) From: JIMMIE Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, rec.radio.cb, rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: VoiceMax Speech Processor On Nov 29, 9:44*am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Maybe not "informed" but ask people THERE, at Mouser, what their "definition" of _partner_ is and then tell them about this guy. "Dictionary" definitions should not be confused with word usage within contexts that alter the meaning of words. For example, the word _sterilize_ has a different meaning in banking/finance compared to microbiology. In a business context, "partners" generally implies that an ongoing relationship exists by virtue of a written contract. If party A buys parts from party B, and pays for those parts with money, that establishes a provider-customer relationship, not a partnership. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
JIMMIE wrote:
snip I had based my shingle on this quote. Jimmie I hear you Jimmie, the simple fact is Brian uses google to cross post/spew his product. As far as I know they don't give a flying rats ass about usenet abuse. I say no one is buying it anyway so let Brian carry on from his parents basement. No harm no foul. -- http://NewsReader.Com/ |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 29, 9:53*pm, Steve wrote:
JIMMIE wrote: *snip I had based my shingle on this quote. Jimmie I hear you Jimmie, the simple fact is Brian uses google to cross post/spew his product. As far as I know they don't give a flying rats ass about usenet abuse. I say no one is buying it anyway so let Brian carry on from his parents basement. No harm no foul. the problem is certainly guy seem to have a case of OCD concernign him and he uses them to ppormote his product a nice way of making lemonaide of that problem |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They
may very interested. Jimmie Yes Jimmie-boy... I think you should alert them immediately... lol www.telstar-electronics.com |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 08:52:09 -0800 (PST), Telstar Electronics
wrote: Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Yes Jimmie-boy... I think you should alert them immediately... lol www.telstar-electronics.com I don't personaly see much need for your product but I do enjoy the way you make lemonaide of your detractors "one useless man is disgrace 2 become a law firm 3 or more become a congress" adams woger you are a Congress all in your own head http://kb9rqz.bravejournal.com/ altopia is never used by KB9RQZ nor is ever btw i can be found at 17366 N River Rd Chassel Mi but the cowards asking lack the gut to act ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 29, 8:58*pm, Grumpy The Mule wrote:
There are no federal laws in the USA governing partnerships. It may be covered by some state law where Mouser is incorporated. The issue is trademark infringement. *Something most companies take quite seriously. Stray Dog wrote tar.org: On Sat, 29 Nov 2008, JIMMIE wrote: Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 13:34:31 -0800 (PST) From: JIMMIE Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew, rec.radio.cb, * * rec.radio.amateur.equipment Subject: VoiceMax Speech Processor On Nov 29, 9:44*am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Maybe not "informed" but ask people THERE, at Mouser, what their "definition" of _partner_ is and then tell them about this guy. "Dictionary" definitions should not be confused with word usage within contexts that alter the meaning of words. For example, the word _sterilize_ has a different meaning in banking/finance compared to microbiology. In a business context, "partners" *generally implies that an ongoing relationship exists by virtue of a written contract. If party A buys parts from party B, and pays for those parts with money, that establishes a provider-customer relationship, not a partnership.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Trademark infrindgement was there complaint against me. I was young and more foolish than I am now and thought the little blurb on my shingle would be funny and no one would even notice. They noticed and didnt think my humor was that funny. For me it only took about 10 minutes and some black paint to remedy the problem. Jimmie |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Steve wrote:
JIMMIE wrote: On Nov 29, 9:44=A0am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Oh no, are you going to report him to Mouser? -- http://NewsReader.Com/ Hey OM well I tell you what let's say a certain company is running racketeering like some big electronics firm. This racket involves taking peoples money and laundering it then giving it back after it's been laundered. Now lets say you partnered with this company then you too would be guilty of racketeering which under RICO laws is a felony. So in the end your so called definition of partner would fall under the guise of RICO and you will go to jail for a real long time and your best friend in jail will be bubba. In other words your guilty by association. 73 OM n8zu |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
well I tell you what let's say a certain company is running
racketeering like some big electronics firm. This racket involves taking peoples money and laundering it then giving it back after it's been laundered. Now lets say you partnered with this company then you too would be guilty of racketeering *which under RICO laws is a felony. So in the end your so called definition of partner would fall under the guise of RICO and you will go to jail for a real long time and your best friend in jail will be bubba. In other words your guilty by association. n8zu I had no idea so many attorneys frequented this group... lol |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
On Dec 3, 4:51*pm, raypsi wrote:
On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Steve wrote: JIMMIE wrote: On Nov 29, 9:44=A0am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Oh no, are you going to report him to Mouser? -- * * * * * * * * *http://NewsReader.Com/ Hey OM well I tell you what let's say a certain company is running racketeering like some big electronics firm. This racket involves taking peoples money and laundering it then giving it back after it's been laundered. Now lets say you partnered with this company then you too would be guilty of racketeering *which under RICO laws is a felony. So in the end your so called definition of partner would fall under the guise of RICO and you will go to jail for a real long time and your best friend in jail will be bubba. In other words your guilty by association. 73 OM n8zu Thats happened, when you raid a cathouse you get the piano player too. Perhaps one could prove their disassociation enough to stay out of jail but your lawyer may be putting a new addition on his house and dedicating it to you. |
VoiceMax Speech Processor
raypsi wrote:
On Nov 29, 5:42 pm, Steve wrote: JIMMIE wrote: On Nov 29, 9:44=A0am, Telstar Electronics wrote: So did Mouser assist you in the design, or put up money to market you splatter circuit? Do they get a cut of your business? Do they sell your junk in their catalog? Or is your only partnership just that you order parts from them? Do they even know what you order parts for? Partner with Mouser, yeah right, just more telestar hype. Commander... Like I said earlier... the dictionary defines partner as "One that is united or associated with another or others in an activity or a sphere of common interest." I guess you're not able to comprehend that sentence. Not really surprising. If you're looking for an argument... I only argue with worthwhile adversaries... lol Perhaps Mouser should be informed of this claim to partnership. They may very interested. Jimmie Oh no, are you going to report him to Mouser? -- http://NewsReader.Com/ Hey OM well I tell you what let's say a certain company is running racketeering like some big electronics firm. This racket involves taking peoples money and laundering it then giving it back after it's been laundered. Now lets say you partnered with this company then you too would be guilty of racketeering which under RICO laws is a felony. So in the end your so called definition of partner would fall under the guise of RICO and you will go to jail for a real long time and your best friend in jail will be bubba. In other words your guilty by association. 73 OM n8zu Hello zu, You're right about the guilt by association, just look at what happened to OJ Simpsons' friend today. 15 years is along way to go for a ride along. 73 Steve. -- http://NewsReader.Com/ |
Quote:
There is fine print associated with your orders from Mouser. In it, they declare that the transaction is considered proprietary, and you are not to indicate any details of it to anybody outside your company. You agreed to this when you placed your orders. In general, you are not legally allowed to declare who your suppliers are, unless they give you permission. Likewise, your commercial customers usually do not want the world knowing that they buy things from you. If I'm in competition with Larry's CB shop, and he's selling something for a whole lot less than I can sell it for, then I surely want to know where he gets it from. But Larry's got a good supplier, who keeps confidentiality agreements, so I am effectively on my own to figure out where to get that thing so cheaply. Mouser is owned by TTI, and their policy is to never indicate who their customers are, unless the customer and TTI enter into a specific agreement for joint marketing. A company's "customer list" is considered one of the highest value proprietary items they have. Industrial spies seek to steal these lists. So, no, it is not entirely up to them. You would have to specifically grant them permission to do so. By business law, you are not "partners". The dictionary definition you provided clearly indicates an egalitarian relationship. You do not have one. They want money, you want parts - that's a one-way relationship, not a partnership. I'm sure this all went over your head, though. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com