![]() |
Doubling
This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know
the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? TIA -Bill WX4A |
Doubling
"exray" wrote in message ... In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? TIA -Bill WX4A Hi Bill. Remember that single ended frequency multiplier stages are usually operated in Class-C where the nonlinear operation of the stage produces the harmonics. In a Class-C stage, the grid (of the tube since we are talking about vintage transmitters) is biased such that the plate current only flows in short pulses. The narrower the pulse width, the greater the harmonic generation of the stage. If you look in the old RCA Transmitting Tube Manual, there is a design procedure where the "conduction angle" of the tube is chosen for proper harmonic generation. Frequency doubling is unique in that two Class-B stages may be used in a push-push arrangement. Here the grids are driven in push-pull while the plates are connected together in parallel. The resulting waveform will essentially be the equivalent of full-wave rectification of the input signal. Without going into Fourier series, the resultant waveform only contains even harmonics of the input signal while the fundamental driving frequency is cancelled out. Fortunately I was already a ham operator when my high school math class taught Fourier series *. I immediately saw the practical value of this mathematical concept and it made good sense to me. Your question is a good one and reading some of the tutorials on Fourier series (do a Google search) will be very useful to your understanding of harmonic generation and intermodulation distortion. I hope that my simple explanation will start you in your own exploration. 73, Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ * More years ago that I care to admit! :-) |
Doubling
NoSPAM wrote:
Remember that single ended frequency multiplier stages are usually operated in Class-C where the nonlinear operation of the stage produces the harmonics. In a Class-C stage, the grid (of the tube since we are talking about vintage transmitters) is biased such that the plate current only flows in short pulses. Thanks Barry, I get it. I was becoming distracted by some of the old 1930s articles touting the tritet osc for its ability to create more harmonic output (true) for directly driving following stages. I suppose thats just another way of reaching the same goal. (btw, haven't heard from you in years - I recall your great input over on r.a.r. +p. No, it hasn't changed ) -Bill |
Doubling
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:30:24 -0400, exray
wrote: This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) In an overtone oscillator, the resonator actually forces the crystal to mechanically resonate at 1/3, 1/5, 1/7, 1/9 etc. of the crystal width. Due to the end effects, the frequency is *not* _exactly_ 3, 5, 7, 9 etc. times the fundamental frequency, but quite close. In principle, the oscillator is producing a single frequency, the (harmonic) mechanical resonance frequency of the crystal. But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? The non-linearity of the stage will produce the harmonics, which are _exact_ integer multipliers of the input frequency. Symmetrically clipping stages generate strong odd harmonics, while asymmetric stages create strong even harmonics. The following stages need to filter out the desired harmonics. So if you need exactly 30.000... MHz, you either have to use a 10.000... MHz fundamental crystal oscillator followed by a tripler (and filtering stage) or order an _overtone_ crystal for exactly 30.000... MHz. Running a nominally 10.000... MHz fundamental mode crystal in an overtone oscillator tuned at 30 MHz will not produce exactly 30.000... MHz but something quite closely, due to the end effect. Paul OH3LWR |
Doubling
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, exray wrote: Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:30:24 -0400 From: exray Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) I think this is correct, but the books say that tuning the output of the oscillator can "pull" the frequency of the oscillating crystal. I have sometimes seen this. But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. In the last few years I have built many tube stages and observed the harmonic voltage output on a wideband oscilloscope. As a matter of fact if you ever get a wideband scope and look at the locked output waveform as you tune through the both the fundamental and the harmonic frequency you will be very surprised at what you will see. All of the descriptions in all of the handbooks I have read (a few) explain this from a theoretical perspective but don't bother to actually show, with photographs of actual scope traces, how this works. It would just take an extra page or two and would make people think about what they are doing. All amplifiers have some non-linearity, the question is what effect this has on you meeting "purity" of emissions requirements. The more important question is whether you are getting the gain/drive that you want from a given stage of amplification. Reducing unwanted spurious emissions might require more tuned circuits or measurement using a receive with an S-meter and operated many wavelengths from your antenna. Most "appliance operators" just buy a commercial rig and don't worry about anything; homebrewers might not worry either if their signals go through a tuned circuit, an antenna tuner, and an antenna for a narrow frequency range. If you really want to blow your mind, then hook an oscilloscope to the output of a mixer with two low harmonic content input sine waves to be mixed. The raw output will look like hell on a scope. The only way to see the mixed (say, difference) frequency will be to go through at least a couple of tuned circuits that are tuned for the wanted sine wave frequency. I've done this stuff. There are a couple of other minor matters that are not quite correct in our ham handbooks, too. TIA -Bill WX4A |
Doubling
On Nov 21, 8:24*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
"exray" wrote in message ... *In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. *(Stop me if I'm wrong already...) *But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? *TIA *-Bill *WX4A Hi Bill. Remember that single ended frequency multiplier stages are usually operated in Class-C where the nonlinear operation of the stage produces the harmonics. *In a Class-C stage, the grid (of the tube since we are talking about vintage transmitters) is biased such that the plate current only flows in short pulses. *The narrower the pulse width, the greater the harmonic generation of the stage. *If you look in the old RCA Transmitting Tube Manual, there is a design procedure where the "conduction angle" of the tube is chosen for proper harmonic generation. Frequency doubling is unique in that two Class-B stages may be used in a push-push arrangement. *Here the grids are driven in push-pull while the plates are connected together in parallel. *The resulting waveform will essentially be the equivalent of full-wave rectification of the input signal. *Without going into Fourier series, the resultant waveform only contains even harmonics of the input signal while the fundamental driving frequency is cancelled out. Fortunately I was already a ham operator when my high school math class taught Fourier series *. *I immediately saw the practical value of this mathematical concept and it made good sense to me. *Your question is a good one and reading some of the tutorials on Fourier series (do a Google search) will be very useful to your understanding of harmonic generation and intermodulation distortion. *I hope that my simple explanation will start you in your own exploration. * * 73, *Barry L. Ornitz * WA4VZQ * More years ago that I care to admit! *:-) Wow, there's a name I haven't seen for a while. I must be frequenting the wrong groups. I was just thinking about you a couple days ago. Hi Barry! More about what Barry wrote: in the limit as the conduction angle goes to zero and you generate a very narrow pulse of current, the harmonics end up all the same amplitude. That's for an impulse of zero width. Unfortunately, given limited amplitude of the current in that very narrow pulse, the total energy becomes small. As you widen the pulse, you'll see that the "comb" of harmonics no longer has constant amplitude, but the amplitudes as you go up the "comb" (higher in frequency)drop, and there will be a frequency at which they go to zero, and then increase again (and go to zero again, and increase again). The magnitudes follow a sin(x)/x shape, for perfectly rectangular pulses. This becomes interesting for a the design of frequency multiplier stages: if for example you want to get x4 out of a stage you better NOT run it at a conduction angle that results in nulling of the fourth harmonic! I think I was bit by this a time or two in my youth when I didn't understand this. (I'm working on something right now where I want that comb of harmonics to be all very nearly equal amplitude up to about 100MHz, and that tells me how narrow the pulse must be.) Cheers, Tom |
Doubling
On Nov 21, 9:30*pm, exray wrote:
This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator * I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. *(Stop me if I'm wrong already...) You're right on the trail. Most oscillator circuits are operating deep in class C. The exceptions are called "marginal, doesn't always start" oscillators :-). Some oscillators make the crystal operate on an overtone. An overtone is often very very close to a harmonic. In this case the LC tank chooses the overtone where gain is going to be greater than one. Overtones close to odd harmonics are usually much more active in the crystal. Other oscillators make the crystal operate on the fundamental, and the output picks off the harmonic. This is where the electron coupled oscillator shines. It's possible to have the crystal operate on the overtone, and then electron-couple to pick a harmonic of the overtone. You see this in some 40's/50's/60's era VHF projects. But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? Mostly creating. It doesn't hurt if there's some harmonic content at the input. Again, for efficiency most of the power stages will be in class C already, and if they need to multiply in a non-power stage they'll set it up to make a lot of harmonics. Individual stages are sometimes configured in push-pull to favor odd harmonics over even ones, or are biased to be favorable for the desired harmonic. Tim. |
Doubling
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:30:24 -0400, exray wrote:
This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) You're wrong already, kinda. Most of the schematics that I've seen from back then have the crystal oscillating at it's fundamental. If the energy extracted from the oscillator is at twice the crystal frequency it's because of harmonics generated in the tube. I don't have a lot of reference material to look at, but I don't think that using a crystal's overtones to generate RF really picked up until the 50's (it was probably done during WW-II, but I only see it put forth as a common method starting with my '50's ARRL handbooks). But in a doubling amplifier stage am I counting on having enough harmonic content at the input or am I creating the harmonic with the non-linearity of the amplifier? You're creating the harmonic with the nonlinearity of the amplifier. A class C stage (which is pretty much assumed for CW transmitters) is very rich in harmonics, and the harder you drive it the higher the harmonics go. So it's pretty easy to get one to generate considerable energy at a harmonic frequency, which you then pick out with your tank circuit. -- Tim Wescott Control systems and communications consulting http://www.wescottdesign.com Need to learn how to apply control theory in your embedded system? "Applied Control Theory for Embedded Systems" by Tim Wescott Elsevier/Newnes, http://www.wescottdesign.com/actfes/actfes.html |
Doubling
Tim Wescott wrote:
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 22:30:24 -0400, exray wrote: This is a really dumb question but it dawned on me that I did not know the correct answer. In terms of old transmitters from the 20s/30s...In a crystal oscillator I understand the concept of setting the oscillator output tank to favor the harmonic from the crystal. (Stop me if I'm wrong already...) You're wrong already, kinda. Most of the schematics that I've seen from back then have the crystal oscillating at it's fundamental. If the energy extracted from the oscillator is at twice the crystal frequency it's because of harmonics generated in the tube. Ok, I'll buy that. One description I read of the tritet osc described it as being an oscillator with inherent class c amplification, hence the plate circuit being tuned to the desired 'harmonic' and the crystal is indeed operating at its fundamental freq. -Bill |
Doubling
On Nov 27, 1:30*am, Tim Wescott wrote:
I don't have a lot of reference material to look at, but I don't think that using a crystal's overtones to generate RF really picked up until the 50's (it was probably done during WW-II, but I only see it put forth as a common method starting with my '50's ARRL handbooks). In 1930's QST's it's not too uncommon to see neophytes warned that crystals will often oscillate on something other than their marked frequency. They didn't call this overtone operation, though. BC-604's (WWII era) start with a ridiculously low crystal (400ish kHz) frequency and multiply up but I think the reason for this is more to do with FM deviation than anything else. ("Armstrong method"?) For many decades, broadcast FM stations similarly started with low crystal frequencies and multiplied up. Tim. |
Doubling
Tim Shoppa wrote:
In 1930's QST's it's not too uncommon to see neophytes warned that crystals will often oscillate on something other than their marked frequency. They didn't call this overtone operation, though. They /might/ be suggesting that frequency can change with loading. I find that some of the reference crystals I use are quite some way off their marked frequency when given capacitive loading that differs from that recommended by the manufacturers! BC-604's (WWII era) start with a ridiculously low crystal (400ish kHz) frequency and multiply up but I think the reason for this is more to do with FM deviation than anything else. ("Armstrong method"?) For many decades, broadcast FM stations similarly started with low crystal frequencies and multiplied up. Some of the broadcast transmitters I worked on 25 years ago used this method for FM, and were /really/ difficult to line up! They also included complex circuitry for the required "pre-distortion" of the audio to compensate for the non-linear deviation you got out of a crystal oscillators. Some manufacturers tried to overcome the distortion issue by using phase modulation and the "right" audio curves, but these required even more stages of multiplication! One of my earliest jobs as a broadcast transmitter engineer was to develop a PLL to replace the horrible multiplier chains in some of these transmitters. I used (normally) either half or quarter frequency generation, and used the last one or two multiplier stages. The CMOS PLL circuitry could be prone to bizarre effects with high field strengths, so they were built in sealed diecast boxes, and the lower frequency generation meant that the high power output stages were unlikely to couple back into the oscillator! Bob |
Doubling
On Nov 22, 8:43*pm, Stray Dog wrote:
Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. |
Doubling
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 08:20:56 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Nov 22, 8:43*pm, Stray Dog wrote: Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. All tubes (and transistors, etc) have non-linearities (if the transfer characteristics are non-straight lines) if that is what you are talking about. However, I have observed output on a scope of second harmonics (and, yes, the time base was set right and auto-self triggering) and the amplifier was running no higher than Class B. You should actually try this yourself and see for yourself. Tune the output to the second harmonic and you will see grow out of the vally new "peaks" corresponding to that second harmonic. I don't know what the solid state gear is doing, but from many schematics of the vintage tube gear I'm familiar with show, and measure, biasing for linear operation, even in stages meant to multiply frequency. |
Doubling
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ...
On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. The resultant waveform with the outputs in parallel will look like much like a full wave rectified version of the input signal subtracted from the plate voltage. To express this mathematically, let the input signal be expressed as: Vin = A sin(wt) Now let the voltage gain of each stage be "-k" and the plate voltage be "B". The resultant waveform of the two stages connected in parallel will be: Vout = B - abs[A*k sin(wt)] where "abs" is the absolute value Vout = B - A*k sin(wt) for 0 wt Pi and = B + A*k sin(wt) for Pi wt 2Pi or alternately for -Pi wt 0 We can then calculate the Fourier series of this waveform to determine its spectrum. I will not present the calculations here as it is too difficult to show the integration over defined integrals using only plain text (and I doubt many readers will have math fonts anyway). If you wish to see the math for the Fourier series for a number of functions, read: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~agp/calc3/notes2.pdf or http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/notes/chap7.doc. Vout = B - 2*A*K/Pi * [1 - SUMMATION {2*cos(nwt)/(n*n - 1)] for n=2, 4, 6, 8... Note that the original frequency has been eliminated and that only even order harmonics are present, and that the amplitudes drop off quite rapidly. For example, the fourth harmonic will be one fifth of the second harmonic. For those that need a simplified explanation of Fourier series, Don Lancaster wrote a good article that can be found at: http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse90.pdf. I always thought Don had a ham license but I could not find one. In a real implementation of this multiplier, a tuned circuit would be used as the plate load. The Q of this tuned circuit will assure that only the second harmonic is present in the output. The two stages would need to be well balanced if cancellation of odd harmonics and the fundamental is required. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ POSTSCRIPT: Now let me describe how it is possible to produce ONLY the second harmonic. Instead of using two Class B or AB stages, it is possible to use triodes operating where their plate current is proportional to the square of the grid voltage. Driving the two such stages in push-pull with the outputs in parallel with a resistive load, the output waveform will be: Vout = B - A*A*k sin(wt)*sin(wt) Using a trigonometric identity {see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities}, sin(x)*sin(x) = sin(x)^2 = 0.5[1-cos(2x)] thus Vout = B - A*A*K/2 + A*A*k/2 cos(2wt) This shows that only the second harmonic is found at the output. |
Doubling
NoSPAM wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM The resultant waveform with the outputs in parallel will look like much like a full wave rectified version of the input signal subtracted from the plate voltage. To express this mathematically, let the input signal be expressed as: Vin = A sin(wt) Now let the voltage gain of each stage be "-k" and the plate voltage be "B". The resultant waveform of the two stages connected in parallel will be: Vout = B - abs[A*k sin(wt)] where "abs" is the absolute value Vout = B - A*k sin(wt) for 0 wt Pi and = B + A*k sin(wt) for Pi wt 2Pi or alternately for -Pi wt 0 We can then calculate the Fourier series of this waveform to determine its spectrum. I will not present the calculations here as it is too difficult to show the integration over defined integrals using only plain text (and I doubt many readers will have math fonts anyway). If you wish to see the math for the Fourier series for a number of functions, read: http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/~agp/calc3/notes2.pdf http://www.maths.qmul.ac.uk/%7Eagp/calc3/notes2.pdfhttp://www.physics.hku.hk/%7Ephys2325/notes/chap7.doc or _http://www.physics.hku.hk/~phys2325/notes/chap7.doc http://www.physics.hku.hk/%7Ephys2325/notes/chap7.doc._ Vout = B - 2*A*K/Pi * [1 - SUMMATION {2*cos(nwt)/(n*n - 1)] for n=2, 4, 6, 8... Note that the original frequency has been eliminated and that only even order harmonics are present, and that the amplitudes drop off quite rapidly. For example, the fourth harmonic will be one fifth of the second harmonic. For those that need a simplified explanation of Fourier series, Don Lancaster wrote a good article that can be found at: http://www.tinaja.com/glib/muse90.pdf. I always thought Don had a ham license but I could not find one. In a real implementation of this multiplier, a tuned circuit would be used as the plate load. The Q of this tuned circuit will assure that only the second harmonic is present in the output. The two stages would need to be well balanced if cancellation of odd harmonics and the fundamental is required. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ POSTSCRIPT: Now let me describe how it is possible to produce ONLY the second harmonic. Instead of using two Class B or AB stages, it is possible to use triodes operating where their plate current is proportional to the square of the grid voltage. Driving the two such stages in push-pull with the outputs in parallel with a resistive load, the output waveform will be: Vout = B - A*A*k sin(wt)*sin(wt) Using a trigonometric identity {see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_trigonometric_identities}, sin(x)*sin(x) = sin(x)^2 = 0.5[1-cos(2x)] thus Vout = B - A*A*K/2 + A*A*k/2 cos(2wt) This shows that only the second harmonic is found at the output. |
Doubling
"Bill Janssen" wrote in message
... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
Doubling
On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
*Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. |
Doubling
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, NoSPAM wrote: Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 23:27:11 -0500 From: NoSPAM Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling "Bill Janssen" wrote in message ... NoSPAM wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... On Nov 22, 8:43 pm, Stray Dog wrote: ? Despite what at least one other person responding to this said, I can rest assure you that if you run a doubler/multiplier stage even in a linear mode, AND if you tune the output of that stage to the multiple harmonic, you will definitely get output at that harmonic frequency which is stronger than the input drive voltage. Huh? No way... you MUST have non-linearities to make a doubler. Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Assume you have two Class B (or AB) stages that are driven in push-pull. The outputs are connected in parallel. And to make things even more linear, let each stage have a resistive load. Each stage will produce a linearly amplified (but inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE POSITIVE HALF of the driving waveform only. Being driven 180 degrees out of phase with the input signal, the second stage will produce a linearly amplified but (again inverted) version of the input signal FOR THE NEGATIVE HALF of the driving waveform. Both outputs will have a DC offset of the plate (collector, drain) voltage. Class B or even Class AB in the circuit you described are non-linear. Try that circuit with Class A biasing. Bill K7NOM All that is really required is that the active devices have a different gain with positive input signals than with negative input signals. This is easily achieved with Class B and Class AB stages. As long as both stages are identical the fundamental and odd order harmonics will cancel. You are correct that with two Class A stages where the gain is identical for either polarity of input, the output signal will perfectly cancel. To make the method work here, you could synchronously switch the input signal between two perfectly linear stages. My point was that a full-wave rectified signal contains only even order harmonics. In the real world, as Stray Dog pointed out, ALL amplifier stages are nonlinear to some degree. The reason that Class AB and B amplifiers are considered linear RF amplifiers is that the tuned circuit on the output supplies supplies the "missing half" of the waveform. Without the tuned circuit, harmonics of the 2nd, 4th, 6th, etc. order as well as the fundamental are present. Odd order harmonics are only found if the gain is nonlinear for positive input signals. The tuned output stage passes the fundamental and suppresses the harmonics. Thanks for pointing this out, Bill. 73, Barry WA4VZQ I'll just add a footnote. When I actually built a few "buffer" amplifiers (tube jobs, 12BY7s, 6AG7s, etc), and for the hell of it, hooked up my scope (an old Tektronix solid state scope with one microsecond/div timebase, max) and actually looked at the sine wave (it looked 'nice' by the way) and then tuned the air variable through both the fundamental or the second harmonic (and I'm talking about 2-3 mHz signal source), I was amazed to be able to easily see the extra "peaks" come out of the "valleys" of the fundamental and I'm running these tubes at zero bias, low plate voltage, too. Look in the tube manuals for any class C tube and they talk about -50 to -70 v, grid negative wrt cathode. Class B and below talk about negative bias much lower but still pretty negative. Like I said, I was surprised. This _should_ be discussed in the ARRL handbooks (maybe it is, but I couldn't find it [maybe I didn't look hard enough?]) and it would be worth 1-2 pages to show everyone what these signals have in them. Here is another goodie (true story). R-390 local oscillator (runs 2.4 to 3.4 mHz, single 6BA6 tube). Had it set to about 3 mHz and looking at that "nice" (I have no harmonic meter to measure distortion) sine wave on the scope, and I "loaded down" the oscillator output lead with a tuned circuit and tuned that circuit to about 6 mHz. Guess what? Got double the number of peaks on the scope, just as with the linear amplifier. All calculate out on peaks vs time base divisions. So? Does anyone want to suggest that having the output LC circuit of an LC free-running oscillator tuned to double the frequency of the LC circuit is making it "oscillate" on its second overtone? ;-) Yeah, I checked resonant frequencies with a GDO on all this stuff, too. I'm not making any of this up. For the record, I also have an old Knight Kit RF oscillator (100Kc to 400 mHz on 3rd harmonic) and put that into my scope and the waveform looks like crap (but you can pick up the signal on a SW receiver set to where the scale matches the frequency of the oscillator). And, the shape of the crap changes from one end of the band to the other. Also have an old HP audio oscillator (high quality stuff) and it puts out a _very_ 'nice' sine wave no matter where in the range you set the dial (one Hz to 200 kHz). 73 all, |
Doubling
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Class A means that plate current is flowing throughout the entire cycle of the input wave with the tube operated between cutoff and saturation. It says nothing about the linearity of the tube's transconductance (plate current as a function of grid voltage). With real devices, the transconductance curve is ALWAYS nonlinear to some degree, producing distortion (and harmonics). As you decrease the drive to a single-ended Class A amplifier, you are working on a smaller and smaller portion portion of the transconductance curve which decreases distortion. In the limit where only an infinitesimal part of the transconductance curve is used, you will get no distortion and no harmonics. Of course, in this situation the tube produces NO output.while drawing current from the power supply. The scheme that I was talking about, known as a push-push doubler, generally uses the tubes operated in Class B although AB operation will work too, but it produces less harmonics. The real advantage of a push-push doubler is that odd order harmonics and the fundamental cancel out, making the resultant waveform easier to filter. 73, Barry WA4VZQ |
Doubling
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Telstar Electronics wrote: Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 06:16:29 -0800 (PST) From: Telstar Electronics Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Dec 14, 10:27*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote: *Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... You might want to consider qualifying your thinking on this by setting a specification for harmonic distortion (in other words, you might need to consider how much of that "clean sine wave" signal has other components in it, including non-harmonic componentes) pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... You might also want to consider, here, too, how much harmonic distortion THAT class A amplifier also causes which makes a contribution to the output. and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. You might even more also want to consider that any tuned circuit will pass energy not at the resonance of that tuned circuit. You would probably contribute to your own enlightenment if you actually did some real experiments on this. It does not take long to do. Back when I was an undergraduate student with major in physics (BS, 1966), I worked in a Mossbauer Effect spectrometer lab and we built most of our equipment (dual delay line pulse amplifiers, regulated DC power supplies, repairing survey meters, etc) my boss had me build a waveform converter that used a network of resistors and diodss to convert a sawtooth waveform to sine wave and he was doing this because the book he got the circuit from said that there would be less than 1% harmonic distortion and he was interested in that specification for the spectrometer drives and all of our commercial high quality signal generators were worse in that specification, particulary at the very low frequencies we ran the drives at (less than one cycle per second). So, you have to define what you mean by "clean sine wave." But, I'll also say that, no, you will not get nothing if you tune to the second harmonic and have a linear amplifier (unless, maybe, you have a _perfect_ sine wave and a _perfect_ linear amplifier [the rest of you guys might want to comment on this yeah, I know about Fourier analysis, too]). |
Doubling
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Since the "rec"groups are not supposed to have binaries in them, I placed the graphics as PDF attachments to a post entitled "Harmonics generated by a Class A stage" in the "alt.binaries.ham-radio" newsgroup. If anyone wishes to see these curves and their newsgroup provider does not provide this group, I apologize. I believe Google Groups may not provide binaries, so I suggest getting a real newsreader and a good newsfeed. The first graph is entitled "Transconductance.pdf" and it shows the plate current as a function of the grid voltage. This data was obtained directly from the General Electric datasheet, ET-T1604 dated March, 1960. Since Excel stinks when plotting and doing calculations with data that is not best expressed in a bar chart, I used an evaluation copy of PSIPlot from Poly Software International (http://www.polysoftware,com) to generate the plots. {Real scientists and engineers never use a bar chart except when making presentations to brain challenged management!} :-) The driving waveform and the resultant plate current waveform are shown in the graph entitled "Waveforms.pdf". The obvious flattening is due to cutoff being approached at the crest of the driving waveform. After all, the transconductance curve is not perfectly a straight line. Finally, the spectrum of current waveform is plotted in the graph called "Spectrum.pdf". The spectrum has been normalized with respect to the DC output. The scale of the X-axis is slightly off but it was not worth my time correcting it. The fundamental is about 60 to 70 percent of the DC output, and the second harmonic is about 40 percent of the DC output. All higher harmonic are less than one percent of the DC output except the fifth. Higher harmonics are still greater than one tenth of a percent of the DC up to the _13th_ harmonic. Harmonics beyond the 14th are still readily measured. In conclusion, even single ended Class A amplifiers generate harmonics. If a lower driving voltage were used, the amplitudes of the harmonics would be reduced, but the fundamental would also be reduced. Please follow-up to the "rec.radio.amateur.homebrew" newsgroup. Golden-eared audiophools will be ignored. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ |
Doubling
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:29:35 -0500, "NoSPAM"
wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Did you bypass the cathode resistor or not ? All active elements are more or less nonlinear, so if you need more or less linear amplification, you need to use feedback/feedforward. A non-bypassed cathode/emitter resistor will greatly improve the linearity of a single stage. Paul OH3LWR |
Doubling
On Dec 14, 8:22*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
Actually you do not need any nonlinearity to make a doubler (quadrupler, etc.). Nonsense... please read the definition section at http://minicircuits.com/pages/pdfs/doub9-2.pdf |
Doubling
On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, Paul Keinanen wrote: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 09:47:22 +0200 From: Paul Keinanen Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 23:29:35 -0500, "NoSPAM" wrote: "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. No active device is perfect. I decided to illustrate the fact that a single ended triode operated in Class A can produce harmonics. For a tube, I used a 6C4 (1/2 of a 12AU7) operated with 300 volts on the plate, a grid bias voltage of -7 volts, driven with a pure sine wave of 14 volts peak-to-peak. The high driving voltage was chosen to illustrate my earlier points, but the stage _IS_ operated Class A with the plate current between cutoff and saturation. Did you bypass the cathode resistor or not ? I did the same experiment that he did (6C4) only ran the cathod at chassis, and grid through an RF choke, and 100 vDC on plate, and drove at about 1/2-1 volt and that is zero bias, no need for cathode cap bypass, and I got gain and second harmonic. All active elements are more or less nonlinear, so if you need more or less linear amplification, you need to use feedback/feedforward. A non-bypassed cathode/emitter resistor will greatly improve the linearity of a single stage. I'm still waiting for any "expert" comments from anyone who would care to speculate on the contributions, from oscillator harmonic content vs contribution from harmonic distortion in the amplifier. Paul OH3LWR |
Doubling
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
... Nonsense... please read the definition section at http://minicircuits.com/pages/pdfs/doub9-2.pdf You are grasping at straws trying to defend your beliefs. Their definition only applies to their products. You should have read the entire article. If you consider the single discontinuity of an ideal diode at the origin as nonlinear, then you are correct. In practice, two Class AB or B amplifiers, operated over their most linear region (each individually producing harmonics and intermodulation over 40 dB down from the fundamental), can be used in a push-push configuration to produce even order harmonics. I believe "Stray Dog" and I both have shown that single ended Class A amplifiers DO produce harmonics. The Mini Circuits "doubler" is, I believe, essentially a full wave rectifier using Schottky diodes. If the diodes were ideal, i.e. had no highly non-linear region at low voltages, there would be no fundamental output or odd order harmonics. From my earlier discussion of full wave rectification, perfect diodes would produce the fourth harmonic 14 dB lower than the second harmonic, and the sixth harmonic slightly over 7 dB down from the fourth. The Minicircuits device produces at its output the fundamental and odd order harmonics in addition to the desired even order harmonics. It also requires a drive level of between 0 and 20 dBm. Too low a drive and the doubling action disappears; too high a drive and the amplitude of the higher harmonics increases (until the device burns out). Some further research into the push-push doubler reveals that two sharp cutoff pentodes would do a better job than triodes for this application. Also junction field effect transistors follow square law characteristics over a fairly wide range making them ideal in frequency doubler operation too. It is also possible to nearly achieve ideal diode behavior with the use of very high gain amplifiers with feedback through the diode. See the following Intersil ap-note for details: http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an1114.pdf. My post of the graphs has not appeared on the "alt.binaries.ham-radio" Usenet newsgroup, even on my nntp server which still insists that the newsgroup exists. I'll try again using "alt.binaries.radio.misc" this time. My thanks go to "Stray Dog" for his efforts in also experimenting with a single ended 6C4 triode. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ |
Doubling
See minor point at end.... On Tue, 16 Dec 2008, NoSPAM wrote: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 19:33:53 -0500 From: NoSPAM Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Followup-To: rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Subject: Doubling "Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... Nonsense... please read the definition section at http://minicircuits.com/pages/pdfs/doub9-2.pdf You are grasping at straws trying to defend your beliefs. Their definition only applies to their products. You should have read the entire article. If you consider the single discontinuity of an ideal diode at the origin as nonlinear, then you are correct. In practice, two Class AB or B amplifiers, operated over their most linear region (each individually producing harmonics and intermodulation over 40 dB down from the fundamental), can be used in a push-push configuration to produce even order harmonics. I believe "Stray Dog" and I both have shown that single ended Class A amplifiers DO produce harmonics. The Mini Circuits "doubler" is, I believe, essentially a full wave rectifier using Schottky diodes. If the diodes were ideal, i.e. had no highly non-linear region at low voltages, there would be no fundamental output or odd order harmonics. From my earlier discussion of full wave rectification, perfect diodes would produce the fourth harmonic 14 dB lower than the second harmonic, and the sixth harmonic slightly over 7 dB down from the fourth. The Minicircuits device produces at its output the fundamental and odd order harmonics in addition to the desired even order harmonics. It also requires a drive level of between 0 and 20 dBm. Too low a drive and the doubling action disappears; too high a drive and the amplitude of the higher harmonics increases (until the device burns out). Some further research into the push-push doubler reveals that two sharp cutoff pentodes would do a better job than triodes for this application. Also junction field effect transistors follow square law characteristics over a fairly wide range making them ideal in frequency doubler operation too. It is also possible to nearly achieve ideal diode behavior with the use of very high gain amplifiers with feedback through the diode. See the following Intersil ap-note for details: http://www.intersil.com/data/an/an1114.pdf. My post of the graphs has not appeared on the "alt.binaries.ham-radio" Usenet newsgroup, even on my nntp server which still insists that the newsgroup exists. I'll try again using "alt.binaries.radio.misc" this time. I learned many years ago that even non-binary newsgroups _can_ carry attached files (in any format), but then later learned that ISPs can configure their newsservers in ways that can prevent you from making a post with an attached file. I discovered that when a post I tried to make with a new ISP gave me an error message. It is possible that you have an ISP that somehow prevents either/or the body and/or the attached file from being posted either dependently or independently from each other. And, tech support people don't understand this, and sometimes even the geeky whips who are sysops don't understand it, either. You might actually do better if you can set up a "personal" web page and just load the jpeg or gif files with associated URLs. My thanks go to "Stray Dog" for his efforts in also experimenting with a single ended 6C4 triode. Thank you for taking the time to read about my "discovery" and making an acknowledgement. But, most of the tube transmitter schematics I ever looked at for driver/buffer/multiplier stages sure looked like they were running linear bias voltages on the control grids instead of class C biases. And, it was quite an experience to see, on a quality oscilloscope, that second harmonic come out of nothing as the air variable capacitor was adjusted for the second harmonic frequency. And, the S-meter on the receiver, tuned to the second harmonic frequency, also bumped up a few S units, too, at the same time. 73, Dr. Barry L. Ornitz WA4VZQ |
Doubling
On Dec 15, 11:29*pm, "NoSPAM" wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message ... You mean to tell me that you take a clean sine wave... pass it through... say a single-ended class A amp... and you can put a tank on the output of that amplifier... and tune for a harmonic? You will get nothing. Of course you will. *No active device is perfect. Hey OM The nature of the beast is: single ended amps produce rich even harmonics Push Pull amps produce rich odd harmonics so you can gits odd harmonics from single ended but they are poor like me. 73 OM n8zu |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com