RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   Jerry Stuckle? (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/205600-jerry-stuckle.html)

gareth July 21st 14 08:53 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?



Jerry Stuckle July 21st 14 09:24 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/21/2014 3:53 PM, gareth wrote:
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?



Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.

But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.

We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

Jack the Postman July 21st 14 10:14 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"gareth" wrote:
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?


I'll bet he's never been arrested for attacking a postman. Unlike Gareth
G4SDW

Jerry Stuckle July 21st 14 10:55 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/21/2014 5:50 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 22/07/2014 6:24 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/21/2014 3:53 PM, gareth wrote:
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?



Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.

But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.

We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"

oxymoron ?


No - it means "lack of intelligence" - i.e. someone dumber than a doorknob.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

gareth July 21st 14 11:28 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"gareth" wrote in message
...
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?


Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".



Channel Jumper July 22nd 14 12:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gareth (Post 822138)
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

You ought not use so many big words in one sentence, he might not understand what you are trying to say and I don't think he has anyone to interpret it for him.
Maybe you could buy him a box of crayons so he can stay in his room and draw on the walls, and won't have to post so many attacks on others.

Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 01:08 AM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/21/2014 6:28 PM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?


Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".



ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.

If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!

Now go on back and play with your Legos.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 01:11 AM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/21/2014 7:00 PM, Channel Jumper wrote:

gareth;822138 Wrote:
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?


You ought not use so many big words in one sentence, he might not
understand what you are trying to say and I don't think he has anyone to
interpret it for him.
Maybe you could buy him a box of crayons so he can stay in his room and
draw on the walls, and won't have to post so many attacks on others.





So sayeth the unlicensed troll who is also well-known for his ignorance
in these newsgroups.

But you don't like people who understand you.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 01:48 AM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/21/2014 8:20 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 22/07/2014 7:55 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/21/2014 5:50 PM, atec77 wrote:
On 22/07/2014 6:24 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/21/2014 3:53 PM, gareth wrote:
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?



Sure. I do all of the time - with adults.

But not with intellectual idiots like you. You are impossible for
anyone to have an adult discourse with - as the judge in your case
understood.

We've got your number, Gareth. But it is NOT 666.

"intellectual idiots"

oxymoron ?


No - it means "lack of intelligence" - i.e. someone dumber than a
doorknob.

hence you not understanding oxymoron , your deprivation and mental state


Oh, I understand oxymoron. But obviously YOU don't. "Intellectual
idiot" is not an oxymoron. "Military Intelligence" is.

Now who has the "deprivation and mental state"? Looks like a troll with
a false 'nym, an invalid email address and no call sign.

IOW, a troll.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

gareth July 22nd 14 07:04 AM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 6:28 PM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?

Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".

ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.




Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 01:16 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 2:04 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 7/21/2014 6:28 PM, gareth wrote:
"gareth" wrote in message
...
Is Stuckle notorious for behaving like an infant who throws
his teddies out of the pram, and is he capable of engaging
in an adult discourse?
Based upon his further childish outbursts, the answers would seem
to be, "Yes", and, "No".

ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.




ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.

Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle

==================

gareth July 22nd 14 03:08 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.




Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 03:32 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 10:08 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.

ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.




Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).

Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

gareth July 22nd 14 03:44 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.



Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 06:07 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 10:44 AM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?

Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.



No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.

Really - you are just TOO EASY.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

gareth July 22nd 14 06:49 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.



It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.



rickman July 22nd 14 06:57 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough, you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?

No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.



It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.


Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.

--

Rick

gareth July 22nd 14 07:01 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
"rickman" wrote in message
...
Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like mirror
images of one another.


On the contrary, Stuckle and you have one thing in common, and that is
that you both resort to offensive personal remarks.

I am merely chastising the pair of you for your childish behaviours.



Jerry Stuckle July 22nd 14 07:30 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.



It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.


Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

rickman July 22nd 14 11:42 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 2:30 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do. About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.


Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!


Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded person.

--

Rick

Jerry Stuckle July 23rd 14 12:57 AM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 6:42 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 2:30 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do.
About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone
else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they
talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!


Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded person.


It could be like teasing a retarded person, but I would never do that.
Gareth is just plain stoopid. And I think it's funny to see what
garbage he comes up with next.

Of course, none of it is original. He's incapable of that.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

rickman July 23rd 14 05:26 AM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/22/2014 7:57 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 6:42 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 2:30 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do.
About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone
else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they
talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!


Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded person.


It could be like teasing a retarded person, but I would never do that.
Gareth is just plain stoopid.


What do you think stupid means?

--

Rick

Jerry Stuckle July 23rd 14 02:37 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/23/2014 12:26 AM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 7:57 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 6:42 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 2:30 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing
quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do.
About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone
else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often
enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they
talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the
patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!

Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded person.


It could be like teasing a retarded person, but I would never do that.
Gareth is just plain stoopid.


What do you think stupid means?


There is a huge difference between retarded and stoopid. A retarded
person has a biological condition he can't help. A stoopid person has
no such condition.

And no, I am not misspelling "stoopid" - at least not in Gareth's case.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

rickman July 23rd 14 08:33 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/23/2014 9:37 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/23/2014 12:26 AM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 7:57 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 6:42 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 2:30 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing
quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do.
About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling anyone
else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often
enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they
talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the
patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!

Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded person.


It could be like teasing a retarded person, but I would never do that.
Gareth is just plain stoopid.


What do you think stupid means?


There is a huge difference between retarded and stoopid. A retarded
person has a biological condition he can't help. A stoopid person has
no such condition.

And no, I am not misspelling "stoopid" - at least not in Gareth's case.


Ok, I understand now. You are just as "stoopid" as Gareth, it is just
not quite as obvious. Goodbye.

--

Rick

Jerry Stuckle July 23rd 14 10:21 PM

Jerry Stuckle?
 
On 7/23/2014 3:33 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/23/2014 9:37 AM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/23/2014 12:26 AM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 7:57 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 6:42 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 2:30 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:57 PM, rickman wrote:
On 7/22/2014 1:49 PM, gareth wrote:
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
...
ROFLMAO. No one else agreed with you, so you have to
reply to
yourself.
If you ever argued with yourself you'd lose the argument!
Now go on back and play with your Legos.
ROPFLMAO! No, you're playing the role of troll - and doing
quite
well
at it. At least there's ONE thing in this world you can do.
About
the
only thing, though.
Why don't you go back to your CB buddies? Or are they too
intelligent
for you?
Yea, keep trying to convince yourself. You're not fooling
anyone
else
here - might as well fool yourself. So if you say it often
enough,
you
might actually start to believe it (but no one else will).
Meanwhile, why not go back to your CB buddies? Or won't they
talk to
you any more, either?
No, you ARE the disruptive infant in kindergarten school. But
then
trolls always are.
Really - you are just TOO EASY.


It remains that I have to continue to play the role of the
patient
schoolteacher dealing with
you as the disruptive infant in the kindergarten school.

You seem intent on shouting out infantile abusive remarks at every
turn. It
does
not reflect very well on your character.

Shame on you.

Wow, I've gotten mixed up as to who is who here. You two are like
mirror images of one another.


Rick, Gareth is just a lot of fun to play. He's just SO EASY :)

Quite entertaining, really. And SO predictable!

Predictable, entertaining... no, not really. I think it is pretty
stupid egging him on. A bit like teasing a child or a retarded
person.


It could be like teasing a retarded person, but I would never do that.
Gareth is just plain stoopid.

What do you think stupid means?


There is a huge difference between retarded and stoopid. A retarded
person has a biological condition he can't help. A stoopid person has
no such condition.

And no, I am not misspelling "stoopid" - at least not in Gareth's case.


Ok, I understand now. You are just as "stoopid" as Gareth, it is just
not quite as obvious. Goodbye.


No, there really is a difference. A retarded person is incapable of
learning, due to a biological condition.

A stoopid person is capable of learning - but refuses to do so.

Please don't confuse retarded people with stoopid people. It's
degrading to retarded people.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com