![]() |
DOUGLAS SNOWDEN wrote:
Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? I've wired my own home with Cat5 and have no problems, in either direction. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
Ethernet Wired Homes - Interference prone?
DOUGLAS SNOWDEN wrote:
Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? I've wired my own home with Cat5 and have no problems, in either direction. -- Doug Smith W9WI Pleasant View (Nashville), TN EM66 http://www.w9wi.com |
I've got CAT5 Etherenet in my house (even in my shack) and have no
problems either way. CAT5 is balanced and very tightly twisted so there is not a lot of leakage. You wouldn't want to run an antenna right next to it, but it is fine for a normal installation. |
I've got CAT5 Etherenet in my house (even in my shack) and have no
problems either way. CAT5 is balanced and very tightly twisted so there is not a lot of leakage. You wouldn't want to run an antenna right next to it, but it is fine for a normal installation. |
I have several PC's wired to a hub router and ADSL, using cat 5
connections. No problems have been detected with RF noise. In article , DOUGLAS SNOWDEN writes Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ -- Ken Ashcroft |
I have several PC's wired to a hub router and ADSL, using cat 5
connections. No problems have been detected with RF noise. In article , DOUGLAS SNOWDEN writes Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ -- Ken Ashcroft |
Doug -
"Properly installed" should be NO problem I installed miles of Cat 5 running Ethernet at a major hospital. Due to ICU, Surgery, Radiology and Lab departments, we swept the entire area for any potential interference - which would interfere with patient support equipment. NONE. The industry does not need "urban legends" "Properly installed" is the key aspect --- and their are a number of certification organizations for installers and contractors. gb -- Do not use Reply (spam logger & catcher). Reply only through ARRL forwarding service to W9GB "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote in message ... Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ |
Doug -
"Properly installed" should be NO problem I installed miles of Cat 5 running Ethernet at a major hospital. Due to ICU, Surgery, Radiology and Lab departments, we swept the entire area for any potential interference - which would interfere with patient support equipment. NONE. The industry does not need "urban legends" "Properly installed" is the key aspect --- and their are a number of certification organizations for installers and contractors. gb -- Do not use Reply (spam logger & catcher). Reply only through ARRL forwarding service to W9GB "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote in message ... Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ |
Ken Ashcroft wrote:
I have several PC's wired to a hub router and ADSL, using cat 5 connections. No problems have been detected with RF noise. In article , DOUGLAS SNOWDEN writes Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? In my experience at home and at work, it's OK unless and untill a hub, switch, or NIC decides to get noisy. Then it's time to get out the handheld scanner and start tracking it down. The radio shop at WeBuildHighways, my day job, had a bad switch, and it took a day to find out what was trashing their VHF reception. Aside from that, it's just fine. -- Viagra's not what it's cracked up to be. I took a dozen last night and only nine worked. |
Ken Ashcroft wrote:
I have several PC's wired to a hub router and ADSL, using cat 5 connections. No problems have been detected with RF noise. In article , DOUGLAS SNOWDEN writes Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? In my experience at home and at work, it's OK unless and untill a hub, switch, or NIC decides to get noisy. Then it's time to get out the handheld scanner and start tracking it down. The radio shop at WeBuildHighways, my day job, had a bad switch, and it took a day to find out what was trashing their VHF reception. Aside from that, it's just fine. -- Viagra's not what it's cracked up to be. I took a dozen last night and only nine worked. |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN"
wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX |
On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN"
wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX |
Jim -
Shielded twisted pair is included within the EIA/TIA 568 standard and is used in parts of Europe. It is more expensive to install and takes more time to terminate (but less than the old IBM Type 1 cabling system !!) Greg -- Do not use Reply Reply only through ARRL forwarding service to W9GB "Jim, N2VX" wrote in message ... On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX |
Jim -
Shielded twisted pair is included within the EIA/TIA 568 standard and is used in parts of Europe. It is more expensive to install and takes more time to terminate (but less than the old IBM Type 1 cabling system !!) Greg -- Do not use Reply Reply only through ARRL forwarding service to W9GB "Jim, N2VX" wrote in message ... On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX |
" Uncle Peter" wrote in message
... The amount of RF required to interfere with a sensitive RF receiver is quite a few magnitudes less than what would interfere with patient support equipment. On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause interference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable Ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX I will only speak for what I know, have observed in the field or tested in the biomed labs. When testing commenced in 1992 at Mercy, we found the majority of the problems were with switching power supplies that powered the network and computer equipment. Our discoveries and test results forced Compaq to recall equipment for noise and improper grounding [One bad Chinese supplier - they were using several at that time]. Coax [10-Base-T] will limit you to standard Ethernet speed (10 Mb) - and is subject to the quality of cable and its coax shielding - which is why Belden has specific model number of Thick and Thin Ethernet. Fiber Optic is ideal - but you have termination costs and again power issues with equipment. I have not yet tested any of the upcoming 802.3af equipment ("power for phones") - yet another potential to examine in the "wiring closet". Greg w9gb -- Do not use Reply Reply only through ARRL forwarding service to W9GB |
" Uncle Peter" wrote in message
... The amount of RF required to interfere with a sensitive RF receiver is quite a few magnitudes less than what would interfere with patient support equipment. On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause interference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable Ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX I will only speak for what I know, have observed in the field or tested in the biomed labs. When testing commenced in 1992 at Mercy, we found the majority of the problems were with switching power supplies that powered the network and computer equipment. Our discoveries and test results forced Compaq to recall equipment for noise and improper grounding [One bad Chinese supplier - they were using several at that time]. Coax [10-Base-T] will limit you to standard Ethernet speed (10 Mb) - and is subject to the quality of cable and its coax shielding - which is why Belden has specific model number of Thick and Thin Ethernet. Fiber Optic is ideal - but you have termination costs and again power issues with equipment. I have not yet tested any of the upcoming 802.3af equipment ("power for phones") - yet another potential to examine in the "wiring closet". Greg w9gb -- Do not use Reply Reply only through ARRL forwarding service to W9GB |
I get interference from a hub in the basement near the rig. Most noise is on 20 meters. The problem is especially bad if there is an unterminated wire connected to the hub. Jim, N2VX ) wrote: : On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" : wrote: : : Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had : their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and : cause intereference (to them and you) ??? : : Doug N4IJ : : : Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet : from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with : the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 : cable in the near future. : : 73, : Jim : N2VX |
I get interference from a hub in the basement near the rig. Most noise is on 20 meters. The problem is especially bad if there is an unterminated wire connected to the hub. Jim, N2VX ) wrote: : On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" : wrote: : : Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had : their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and : cause intereference (to them and you) ??? : : Doug N4IJ : : : Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet : from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with : the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 : cable in the near future. : : 73, : Jim : N2VX |
Can Cat-5 be run through conduit without any signal degradation? Reason
is to provide mechanical protection. G.Beat wrote: Doug - "Properly installed" should be NO problem I installed miles of Cat 5 running Ethernet at a major hospital. Due to ICU, Surgery, Radiology and Lab departments, we swept the entire area for any potential interference - which would interfere with patient support equipment. NONE. The industry does not need "urban legends" "Properly installed" is the key aspect --- and their are a number of certification organizations for installers and contractors. gb -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny." -F.Z. |
Can Cat-5 be run through conduit without any signal degradation? Reason
is to provide mechanical protection. G.Beat wrote: Doug - "Properly installed" should be NO problem I installed miles of Cat 5 running Ethernet at a major hospital. Due to ICU, Surgery, Radiology and Lab departments, we swept the entire area for any potential interference - which would interfere with patient support equipment. NONE. The industry does not need "urban legends" "Properly installed" is the key aspect --- and their are a number of certification organizations for installers and contractors. gb -- Joe Leikhim K4SAT "Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny." -F.Z. |
That seems to answer my question - not a problem.
Doug N4IJ "Andrew R Mitz" wrote in message ... I get interference from a hub in the basement near the rig. Most noise is on 20 meters. The problem is especially bad if there is an unterminated wire connected to the hub. Jim, N2VX ) wrote: : On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" : wrote: : : Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had : their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and : cause intereference (to them and you) ??? : : Doug N4IJ : : : Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet : from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with : the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 : cable in the near future. : : 73, : Jim : N2VX |
That seems to answer my question - not a problem.
Doug N4IJ "Andrew R Mitz" wrote in message ... I get interference from a hub in the basement near the rig. Most noise is on 20 meters. The problem is especially bad if there is an unterminated wire connected to the hub. Jim, N2VX ) wrote: : On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" : wrote: : : Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had : their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and : cause intereference (to them and you) ??? : : Doug N4IJ : : : Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet : from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with : the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 : cable in the near future. : : 73, : Jim : N2VX |
|
|
Las Vegas NV, since the MGM fire, requires all data cable (cat 5 and cat5e
included) to be run in Metallic conduit... I built a warehouse for a major parcel carrier (who likes to destroy boatanchors ) What an expensive city to run data cable (and phone)!!!!!!! |
Las Vegas NV, since the MGM fire, requires all data cable (cat 5 and cat5e
included) to be run in Metallic conduit... I built a warehouse for a major parcel carrier (who likes to destroy boatanchors ) What an expensive city to run data cable (and phone)!!!!!!! |
arrrrggg type 1!!!!!!!!!!! ever see type 2... (it also had phone cable in
it!!) Both types were a B*^ch to manage correctly!!!!! Bob (who's fingers still hurt from type 1 terminations!!!) |
arrrrggg type 1!!!!!!!!!!! ever see type 2... (it also had phone cable in
it!!) Both types were a B*^ch to manage correctly!!!!! Bob (who's fingers still hurt from type 1 terminations!!!) |
Yes sir,
In the early days of networking, I had to install and support a WIDE variety of networks and physical media (and a few different file server OS - but largely Novell !!) In addition to the original Token Ring 4 Mbps and Thick and Thin Ethernet (10-Base-5 and 10-Base-2) Altos Server and original 3com Net (Thinnet based) Novell's S-Net Proteon's 4-Net and 10-Net (10 Mbps 10-Net was not adopted - later IBM 16 Mbps was) G-Net ( 1 Mbps) Omninet (for Apple II) ARCnet Token-passing (PC and old Datapoint 8-bit processor version) Sytek / IBM PC Network (used 75 ohm CATV cabling) Appletalk for Macs AT&T StarNet (another 1 Mbps) and others from Novell lab classes when Ray Noorda showed up and signed your certificate! Today, the company I work for is owned by the US patent holder for Token Ring .... who said the world is small? w9gb "bobinphx" wrote in message news:3tsOa.120467$MJ5.114971@fed1read03... arrrrggg type 1!!!!!!!!!!! ever see type 2... (it also had phone cable in it!!) Both types were a B*^ch to manage correctly!!!!! Bob (who's fingers still hurt from type 1 terminations!!!) |
Yes sir,
In the early days of networking, I had to install and support a WIDE variety of networks and physical media (and a few different file server OS - but largely Novell !!) In addition to the original Token Ring 4 Mbps and Thick and Thin Ethernet (10-Base-5 and 10-Base-2) Altos Server and original 3com Net (Thinnet based) Novell's S-Net Proteon's 4-Net and 10-Net (10 Mbps 10-Net was not adopted - later IBM 16 Mbps was) G-Net ( 1 Mbps) Omninet (for Apple II) ARCnet Token-passing (PC and old Datapoint 8-bit processor version) Sytek / IBM PC Network (used 75 ohm CATV cabling) Appletalk for Macs AT&T StarNet (another 1 Mbps) and others from Novell lab classes when Ray Noorda showed up and signed your certificate! Today, the company I work for is owned by the US patent holder for Token Ring .... who said the world is small? w9gb "bobinphx" wrote in message news:3tsOa.120467$MJ5.114971@fed1read03... arrrrggg type 1!!!!!!!!!!! ever see type 2... (it also had phone cable in it!!) Both types were a B*^ch to manage correctly!!!!! Bob (who's fingers still hurt from type 1 terminations!!!) |
Like wise, here.
The DSL comes to the house, goes into a plastic conduit, under the ground, 50' to the lab, into the ADSL modem, out as ethernet to a hub, then one line to the server and one back to the house, where it comes in and goes to two more hubs and 4 computers. The The noise is heard as a popping sound in the receivers, and is present in the lab, and in the house. It's worst around 10MHz and 15 MHz, and occurs when there's ethernet traffic. I hope that putting the antenna up on a tower will help. Right now I SWL with an antenna in the attic. The server is a large minicomputer, maybe it's not intended for operation in the home, maybe has less EMI restrictions? "Jim, N2VX" wrote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX |
Like wise, here.
The DSL comes to the house, goes into a plastic conduit, under the ground, 50' to the lab, into the ADSL modem, out as ethernet to a hub, then one line to the server and one back to the house, where it comes in and goes to two more hubs and 4 computers. The The noise is heard as a popping sound in the receivers, and is present in the lab, and in the house. It's worst around 10MHz and 15 MHz, and occurs when there's ethernet traffic. I hope that putting the antenna up on a tower will help. Right now I SWL with an antenna in the attic. The server is a large minicomputer, maybe it's not intended for operation in the home, maybe has less EMI restrictions? "Jim, N2VX" wrote: On Tue, 1 Jul 2003 21:28:36 -0400, "DOUGLAS SNOWDEN" wrote: Just curious, have any of you had trouble with your neighbors that have had their homes wired with CAT5 cable? Does it want to act like an antenna and cause intereference (to them and you) ??? Doug N4IJ Ours generates noise on HF. I have a vertical antenna about 15 feet from the house and that doesn't help. We didn't have problems with the old-style coax cable ethernet. I'll switch to shielded cat-5 cable in the near future. 73, Jim N2VX |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com