Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9/16/2014 12:33 PM, Jeefaw K. Effkay wrote:
On 16/09/2014 16:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Ah, heck - don't make it so easy. A REAL HAM would mine and smelt his own ore (using a garden trowel and blowtorch). He would create his own insulating material from raw materials (bakelite would probably be easiest), and finally shape and assemble the final product. A real ham wouldn't make coaxial connectors. A real ham would be using a link-coupled output from his PA, to a balanced transmission line. PS - don't feed the troll :-) Why said they were coax connectors for a transmitter? I use various types of connecters for many things. For instance, my Tektronix scope has BNC connectors for the probes. And my rigs have connectors for the microphones. Plus I wouldn't use balanced line in the car. I use a lot of connectors for a lot of different things ![]() -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle ================== |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/09/2014 17:49, Jerry Stuckle wrote:
On 9/16/2014 12:33 PM, Jeefaw K. Effkay wrote: On 16/09/2014 16:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Ah, heck - don't make it so easy. A REAL HAM would mine and smelt his own ore (using a garden trowel and blowtorch). He would create his own insulating material from raw materials (bakelite would probably be easiest), and finally shape and assemble the final product. A real ham wouldn't make coaxial connectors. A real ham would be using a link-coupled output from his PA, to a balanced transmission line. PS - don't feed the troll :-) Why said they were coax connectors for a transmitter? I use various types of connecters for many things. For instance, my Tektronix scope has BNC connectors for the probes. And my rigs have connectors for the microphones. Real hams don't use microphones. They only use CW :-) Plus I wouldn't use balanced line in the car. OK - you win :-) |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Lostgallifreyan wrote:
"gareth" wrote in news:lv91j4$gv9$1@dont- email.me: how difficult it is to manufacture our own plugs and sockets, despite that BNC and N have been around for 70 years, with SMC some time later! Also, following on from my other post, given how good BNC's are, and how cheap they are, instead of trying to find alternatives, I try to find ways to use BNC's for other purposes, not hard given the range of high quality adapters! This is NOT a wheel we need to reinvent, I think. Especially when you can find them lying on the sidewalk. Some years back, I came upon a pile of junk on the sidewalk, waiting for the garbage truck. I poke around, and find a near endless number of BNC connectors. I grab some, then continue on my way. Coming back, the rest were still there so I grabbed all of them. QUite a weight once accumulated. There were a few hundred BNC connectors. The only problem was, they were mostly male, though some female and some adapters. Yes, I'd use BNC for audio connectors (something others have done) if I was going to change connectors (or building something new) and probably more important, if this pile had included more female connectors. The bad part is, an even longer time ago, the local surplus place had some odd bit of plastic with one of those coaxial power connectors, 2 or 3 female BNC connectors and I think a DB-25 connector on it. All for 79cents. I bought some, but obviously if I'd known I'd be finding a near endless supply of male BNC connectors, I'd have stocked up more in anticipation. That's reality, you never find the matching stuff at the same time. Michael |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Jeefaw K. Effkay wrote:
On 16/09/2014 16:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Ah, heck - don't make it so easy. A REAL HAM would mine and smelt his own ore (using a garden trowel and blowtorch). He would create his own insulating material from raw materials (bakelite would probably be easiest), and finally shape and assemble the final product. A real ham wouldn't make coaxial connectors. A real ham would be using a link-coupled output from his PA, to a balanced transmission line. And you can certainly make ladder line yourself, once you figure out something for the spacers. I doubt anyone's ever made coax at home. Michael PS - don't feed the troll :-) |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Michael Black" wrote in message
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1409161411150.29263@darkstar. example.org... I doubt anyone's ever made coax at home. It would be an interesting exercise to conceive of the mechanism for weaving the braid, such that it was tight onto the dielectric |
#16
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rec.radio.amateur.homebrew Michael Black wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014, Jeefaw K. Effkay wrote: On 16/09/2014 16:53, Jerry Stuckle wrote: Ah, heck - don't make it so easy. A REAL HAM would mine and smelt his own ore (using a garden trowel and blowtorch). He would create his own insulating material from raw materials (bakelite would probably be easiest), and finally shape and assemble the final product. A real ham wouldn't make coaxial connectors. A real ham would be using a link-coupled output from his PA, to a balanced transmission line. And you can certainly make ladder line yourself, once you figure out something for the spacers. I doubt anyone's ever made coax at home. Michael I've made short lengths of rigid, air dielectric coax for UHF projects from hobby store brass tubing on several occasions. -- Jim Pennino |
#17
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen Thomas Cole wrote in
: Just an FYI. Big G is trolling, here. He's currently being shunned in uk.radio.amateur as the good and decent users of that group have finally had enough of him. Consequently, he's starved for attention, hence the inane postings he's vomiting left, right and centre. He's best avoided. Well, no problem there. I just took up the suject as I saw it. I won't try to talk to Gareth directly, he has never once responded to me as far as I know. I suspect maybe I do not have the right kind of degree and gentlemanly air of electromic authority for him to deign to even notice me. ![]() |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jerry Stuckle wrote in news:lv9mdp$a3o$1@dont-
email.me: Ah, heck - don't make it so easy. A REAL HAM would mine and smelt his own ore (using a garden trowel and blowtorch). He would create his own insulating material from raw materials (bakelite would probably be easiest), and finally shape and assemble the final product. Nice. A similar logic applies to knowledge in general. I once got flamed on a forum for stating a bit of (correct) info simply because it seemed to someone that I had picked it up from others, and they felt I hadn't contributed enough of my own experience to their field (lasering is a ridiculously expensive hobby, so I accept no fault there, given that offering stuff or knowledge for free usually gets the upturned nose anyway). Also, the attitude denies the value of all teaching, so I don't take it too seriously even when I get hurt by it. If we do too much, there will be someone to flame us. That same person might be the first to flame if we do too little. ![]() |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#20
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael Black wrote in
news:alpine.LNX.2.02.1409161406070.29263@darkstar. example.org: Yes, I'd use BNC for audio connectors (something others have done) if I was going to change connectors (or building something new) and probably more important, if this pile had included more female connectors. I've used them for DC power too, sometimes. ![]() surface and material, and a teflon former, this isn't a bad idea, it's likely to handle surges better, and more safely, than many connectors intended to do it. You mention a DB25, another favourite for me. So many pins, each can handle over an amp, some will handle 2A each. For specialised heavy current situations, (perhaps up to 25 A with the better ones, it can be much cheaper to do it that way than with dedicated high current connectors, and it's far more compact too, and the flexibity of the cable is usually better too. (And tens of yards of that cable got thrown out during various company somputer refits, more than I ever imagined any use for). When Maplin did a closing deal on a bunch of metal hoods I bought 40 of them. I doubt I'll ever run out of those, or have to spend any money on more except on occasional need for strange angles in tight spaces. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|