Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! 73, John - K6QQ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"John Moriarity" wrote in message
... "John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! In the immortal words of Natasha the Sex Goddess: Well, DUH! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
John R. Strohm wrote: "John Moriarity" wrote in message ... "John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! In the immortal words of Natasha the Sex Goddess: Well, DUH! Where do I find this goddess? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Josh" wrote in message ... John R. Strohm wrote: "John Moriarity" wrote in message ... "John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! In the immortal words of Natasha the Sex Goddess: Well, DUH! Where do I find this goddess? http://www.amore.com/ Normally, I'd say "Google is your FRIEND", but the site Google has for her is gone. However, the other site, which the Google entry reminded me of, is still around. This site is actually for real, by the way. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Josh" wrote in message ... John R. Strohm wrote: "John Moriarity" wrote in message ... "John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! In the immortal words of Natasha the Sex Goddess: Well, DUH! Where do I find this goddess? http://www.amore.com/ Normally, I'd say "Google is your FRIEND", but the site Google has for her is gone. However, the other site, which the Google entry reminded me of, is still around. This site is actually for real, by the way. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
John R. Strohm wrote: "John Moriarity" wrote in message ... "John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! In the immortal words of Natasha the Sex Goddess: Well, DUH! Where do I find this goddess? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"John Moriarity" wrote in message
... "John R. Strohm" wrote in message ... "Alfred Lorona" wrote in message ... Most mixers I've seen are not matched to 50+j0. They are simply terminated in 50+j0. Is this the best or optimum termination or does it matter? There is no "best" or "optimum" termination, beyond the fact that you want a purely resistive termination. (DUH!). 50 ohms is just the standard value. That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. Use other impedances at your own risk! In the immortal words of Natasha the Sex Goddess: Well, DUH! |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 21:44:22 -0700, "John Moriarity"
wrote: That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. That may apply to most diode ring mixer, but this is not necessarily true for other (active) mixers. Paul OH3LWR |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 6 Jul 2003 21:44:22 -0700, "John Moriarity"
wrote: That *may* be true, but most mixers are characterized with 50 ohm (resistive) terminations at all ports. That may apply to most diode ring mixer, but this is not necessarily true for other (active) mixers. Paul OH3LWR |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: 50 Watt dummy load termination | Equipment | |||
FA: 50 Watt dummy load termination | Equipment | |||
Adding an IF output | Equipment | |||
Eddystone 750 1st Mixer | Boatanchors | |||
FA: Complete studio Equalizer and Mixer Units | Boatanchors |