Convert Astro 11 m amp to 6 AM?
I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of
an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? I'm using a Ten Tec 6 meter Transverter on my Kenwood TS-450S and could use a little more "UMPH". I could use a schematic showing which trim caps are input and which are output if anyone might have one. Terry WB0VQP |
wrote in message
... I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? I'm using a Ten Tec 6 meter Transverter on my Kenwood TS-450S and could use a little more "UMPH". I could use a schematic showing which trim caps are input and which are output if anyone might have one. Terry - 10 meters is 28 to 30 MHz and 6 meters is 50 to 54 MHz. IF this is the Astro that uses the sweep tubes that are now $ 40 to $ 50 each ... Don't bother. That is a money pit solution ... and sweep tubes if they do operate at 50 MHz have low output. Most 11 meter amps were built fast and cheap for a quick buck. At best - it may be a candidate for parts. You have probably heard that there are suitable CB amp candidates for six meter conversion; the problem is, this will be very model-specific and NO general statement really applies. If the original design was truly linear (not just by virtue of a label, but by virtue of correct electronic bias and stabilization circuitry) and used devices rated for operation ABOVE 50 MHz, chances are it can be converted by changing the input and output tuned networks, and possibly the RF decoupling circuitry (DC power to devices). For solid state amplifiers that I see everywhere now that the sunspot cycle is again down, when suitable 50+ MHz transistors are used, simply looking those devices up in their manufacturer's data book (or application notes such as Motorola's) will reveal an actual, tested and proven 50 MHz amplifier circuit which would be easy to copy. IF the only circuit published by the device manufacturer is for an amplifier operating below 30 MHz, that's a pretty good sign the devices won't provide any gain at 50 MHz... BTW, a good 6 meter yagi (which is very easy to build and much smaller than 10 meter beams) will yield more dB increase for less dollars than the amplifier. Greg w9gb |
wrote in message
... I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? I'm using a Ten Tec 6 meter Transverter on my Kenwood TS-450S and could use a little more "UMPH". I could use a schematic showing which trim caps are input and which are output if anyone might have one. Terry - 10 meters is 28 to 30 MHz and 6 meters is 50 to 54 MHz. IF this is the Astro that uses the sweep tubes that are now $ 40 to $ 50 each ... Don't bother. That is a money pit solution ... and sweep tubes if they do operate at 50 MHz have low output. Most 11 meter amps were built fast and cheap for a quick buck. At best - it may be a candidate for parts. You have probably heard that there are suitable CB amp candidates for six meter conversion; the problem is, this will be very model-specific and NO general statement really applies. If the original design was truly linear (not just by virtue of a label, but by virtue of correct electronic bias and stabilization circuitry) and used devices rated for operation ABOVE 50 MHz, chances are it can be converted by changing the input and output tuned networks, and possibly the RF decoupling circuitry (DC power to devices). For solid state amplifiers that I see everywhere now that the sunspot cycle is again down, when suitable 50+ MHz transistors are used, simply looking those devices up in their manufacturer's data book (or application notes such as Motorola's) will reveal an actual, tested and proven 50 MHz amplifier circuit which would be easy to copy. IF the only circuit published by the device manufacturer is for an amplifier operating below 30 MHz, that's a pretty good sign the devices won't provide any gain at 50 MHz... BTW, a good 6 meter yagi (which is very easy to build and much smaller than 10 meter beams) will yield more dB increase for less dollars than the amplifier. Greg w9gb |
wrote in message ... I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? I'm using a Ten Tec 6 meter Transverter on my Kenwood TS-450S and could use a little more "UMPH". I could use a schematic showing which trim caps are input and which are output if anyone might have one. Terry WB0VQP Here is the web link for parts http://www.kenselectronics.com/charles/linear.htm w9gb |
wrote in message
... I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? IF you wanted to use this, I would change the tubes to the Russian GI-7B Triode (which is rated up into the microwaves / 1 GHz) http://www.nd2x.net/gi7b.html http://www.nd2x.net/gi7-socket.html http://www.nd2x.net/W4EMF.html http://www.geocities.com/ko4nrbs/gi7bconversionrev1.doc http://www.geocities.com/ko4nrbs/ |
|
wrote in message ... I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? I'm using a Ten Tec 6 meter Transverter on my Kenwood TS-450S and could use a little more "UMPH". I could use a schematic showing which trim caps are input and which are output if anyone might have one. Terry WB0VQP Here is the web link for parts http://www.kenselectronics.com/charles/linear.htm w9gb |
wrote in message
... I have a couple of Astro Little Devil 11 meter amps that came out of an estate. Wondering of anyone ever succesfully converted one of these to 6 meters? IF you wanted to use this, I would change the tubes to the Russian GI-7B Triode (which is rated up into the microwaves / 1 GHz) http://www.nd2x.net/gi7b.html http://www.nd2x.net/gi7-socket.html http://www.nd2x.net/W4EMF.html http://www.geocities.com/ko4nrbs/gi7bconversionrev1.doc http://www.geocities.com/ko4nrbs/ |
|
|
|
Greg,
IF the only circuit published by the device manufacturer is for an amplifier operating below 30 MHz, that's a pretty good sign the devices won't provide any gain at 50 MHz... BTW, a good 6 meter yagi (which is very easy to build and much smaller than 10 meter beams) will yield more dB increase for less dollars than the amplifier. Not totally true. We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm I totally agree with you on the antenna. (((73))) -- Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
Greg,
IF the only circuit published by the device manufacturer is for an amplifier operating below 30 MHz, that's a pretty good sign the devices won't provide any gain at 50 MHz... BTW, a good 6 meter yagi (which is very easy to build and much smaller than 10 meter beams) will yield more dB increase for less dollars than the amplifier. Not totally true. We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm I totally agree with you on the antenna. (((73))) -- Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
"Philip de Cadenet" wrote in message ... Greg, We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm That's odd, since the SD1450 specifications were for the commercial FM broadcast industry (88 - 108 MHz), and is rated at 150 watts for 18 watts drive. Price is virtually the ame - maybe its higher for you in UK Greg w9gb |
"Philip de Cadenet" wrote in message ... Greg, We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm That's odd, since the SD1450 specifications were for the commercial FM broadcast industry (88 - 108 MHz), and is rated at 150 watts for 18 watts drive. Price is virtually the ame - maybe its higher for you in UK Greg w9gb |
Greg,
We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm That's odd, since the SD1450 specifications were for the commercial FM broadcast industry (88 - 108 MHz), and is rated at 150 watts for 18 watts drive. Price is virtually the ame - maybe its higher for you in UK Where did you get the SD1450 from! Check out our device he http://www.angliac.com/st/data_from_st/2846.pdf Give it a minute to load as it's a PDF page. (((73))) -- Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
Greg,
We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm That's odd, since the SD1450 specifications were for the commercial FM broadcast industry (88 - 108 MHz), and is rated at 150 watts for 18 watts drive. Price is virtually the ame - maybe its higher for you in UK Where did you get the SD1450 from! Check out our device he http://www.angliac.com/st/data_from_st/2846.pdf Give it a minute to load as it's a PDF page. (((73))) -- Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
"Philip de Cadenet" wrote in message ... Greg, We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm Check out our device he http://www.angliac.com/st/data_from_st/2846.pdf Give it a minute to load as it's a PDF page. So you drop from 20 Gp (db) at 30 MHz to 8 Gp (db) at 100 MHz Would not have been my choice. BTW, is your equipment FCC type accepted for USA usage on the commercial FM frequencies (as required) GB |
"Philip de Cadenet" wrote in message ... Greg, We use a THA15/SD1726 (30MHz bi-polar 150w pep) producing 220w in our FM PA in continuous duty service in the 87.5-108MHz broadcast band. Yes, it needs plenty of drive and the heat sink require plenty of air but at $30 USD a hit it's one economical and rugged amp. Here it is: http://www.transmittersrus.com/shop/powerRF220.htm Check out our device he http://www.angliac.com/st/data_from_st/2846.pdf Give it a minute to load as it's a PDF page. So you drop from 20 Gp (db) at 30 MHz to 8 Gp (db) at 100 MHz Would not have been my choice. BTW, is your equipment FCC type accepted for USA usage on the commercial FM frequencies (as required) GB |
Hello GB,
So you drop from 20 Gp (db) at 30 MHz to 8 Gp (db) at 100 MHz Would not have been my choice. BTW, is your equipment FCC type accepted for USA usage on the commercial FM frequencies (as required) Regarding the device choice. I think the designers reason for using the THA15 is that he found a very inexpensive source for the device and he already had a 40w exciter in production. It was a suitably inexpensive device. FCC approval not required if used outside the US. We are not based in the US. My company is a re-seller for NRG products among others. However frequency stability, harmonic attenuation and spurious products would probably meet type approval spec in the US. Not sure how tough your EMC and or electrical safety requirements are but it would probably meet those to after looking at some of the budget end equipment that has FCC type acceptance. I just love those Part-15 Talking House transmitters. Does the FCC still allow self approval on certain equipment? -- Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
Hello GB,
So you drop from 20 Gp (db) at 30 MHz to 8 Gp (db) at 100 MHz Would not have been my choice. BTW, is your equipment FCC type accepted for USA usage on the commercial FM frequencies (as required) Regarding the device choice. I think the designers reason for using the THA15 is that he found a very inexpensive source for the device and he already had a 40w exciter in production. It was a suitably inexpensive device. FCC approval not required if used outside the US. We are not based in the US. My company is a re-seller for NRG products among others. However frequency stability, harmonic attenuation and spurious products would probably meet type approval spec in the US. Not sure how tough your EMC and or electrical safety requirements are but it would probably meet those to after looking at some of the budget end equipment that has FCC type acceptance. I just love those Part-15 Talking House transmitters. Does the FCC still allow self approval on certain equipment? -- Philip de Cadenet G4ZOW Transmitters 'R' Us http://www.transmittersrus.com |
"Philip de Cadenet" wrote in message
... Hello GB, So you drop from 20 Gp (db) at 30 MHz to 8 Gp (db) at 100 MHz Would not have been my choice. BTW, is your equipment FCC type accepted for USA usage on the commercial FM frequencies (as required) ----------------------------------- Regarding the device choice. I think the designer's reason for using the THA15 is that he found a very inexpensive source for the device and he already had a 40w exciter in production. It was a suitably inexpensive device. FCC approval not required, if product is used outside the US. We are not based in the US. My company is a re-seller for NRG products among others. However frequency stability, harmonic attenuation and spurious products would probably meet type approval spec in the US. Not sure how tough your EMC and or electrical safety requirements are but it would probably meet those to after looking at some of the budget end equipment that has FCC type acceptance. I just love those Part-15 Talking House transmitters. Does the FCC still allow self approval on certain equipment? -- At one time, you could call the FCC Field Office and approach the situation like FAA handled non-commercial built planes. I do remember in the 1970s that the FCC would provide this approval from the Field Engineers. Many things changed in the 1980s - in the "name of progress and deregulation" - but I believe "self approval" was NOT one of them. G. Beat w9gb |
"Philip de Cadenet" wrote in message
... Hello GB, So you drop from 20 Gp (db) at 30 MHz to 8 Gp (db) at 100 MHz Would not have been my choice. BTW, is your equipment FCC type accepted for USA usage on the commercial FM frequencies (as required) ----------------------------------- Regarding the device choice. I think the designer's reason for using the THA15 is that he found a very inexpensive source for the device and he already had a 40w exciter in production. It was a suitably inexpensive device. FCC approval not required, if product is used outside the US. We are not based in the US. My company is a re-seller for NRG products among others. However frequency stability, harmonic attenuation and spurious products would probably meet type approval spec in the US. Not sure how tough your EMC and or electrical safety requirements are but it would probably meet those to after looking at some of the budget end equipment that has FCC type acceptance. I just love those Part-15 Talking House transmitters. Does the FCC still allow self approval on certain equipment? -- At one time, you could call the FCC Field Office and approach the situation like FAA handled non-commercial built planes. I do remember in the 1970s that the FCC would provide this approval from the Field Engineers. Many things changed in the 1980s - in the "name of progress and deregulation" - but I believe "self approval" was NOT one of them. G. Beat w9gb |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com