LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old September 9th 03, 01:46 PM
Russell Shaw
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kevin Aylward wrote:
gwhite wrote:

The simple fact is you are wrong in thinking you can all of the sudden
make up your own definition of linearity, or carry forward without
challenge the mistaken definition of others.


Absolute crap. Show me one respectable math reference that says if
y=exp(x), that y is a linear function of x.

You were right about one


Show me one real practical example that does not use a device with a
functional relation between input and output voltage/current that is
linear, as I defined above. As did note as an after thought, it may be
possible in principle, for example, maybe one could construct a true,
linear with voltage, voltage controlled resistor. However, I am not
aware of such magic devices.

The physical reality is that it is not possible. Produce one and I will
retract my claim.


A light dependant resistor. One input drives a LED via a linearizer
to compensate for LDR non-linearity. The LDR resistance is unaffected
by the voltage across it. Therefore, the resulting current
Io=f(V1,V2)= k.V1*V2 (4-quadrant multiplier or compensated gilbert cell)

The circuit output is *superposition linear* relative to each input.
dIo/dV1=k.V2, dIo/dV2=k.V1 (partial derivatives). In mixer operation,
Io=f(Vin,Vosc). Vosc is an independant time-varying signal.
Therefore, Io=f(Vin,Vosc(t)) or Io(t)=g(Vin,t). Because Io vs Vin
is linear (4-quad multiplier), then dIo/dVin= g'(t) ie: a function
of time only. This is the definition of a linear time-varying
circuit.

that is incorrect. You confuse the time-invariance property with the
linearity property. You believe LTI systems are the *only* linear
systems -- they are not according to the widely accepted and published
definition of linearity.


No. Linearity is widely understood to have many definitions. I have
explained some of these already.


An ideal multiplier is considered nonlinear with respect to a certain
signal if a component of that signal is applied to *both* inputs
simultaneously. Then:

Io=k.(V1+a.V2)(a.V1+V2)= k.( aV1^2 + a.V2^2 + (1+a^2).V1.V2 )

 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
Tx Source Impedance & Load Reflections Richard Fry Antenna 8 May 28th 04 06:29 PM
Reflected power ? new thread, new beginning, kinda ? Henry Kolesnik Antenna 6 May 25th 04 11:45 PM
Dipoles & Tuned Circuits Reg Edwards Antenna 0 October 16th 03 11:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:27 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017