Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another question resulting from too much time on my hands. Why do we
have rectifier diodes (e.g. 1N4xxx, 1N54xx) with different voltage ratings? Other than the voltage rating I don't see any differences on the data sheets I've looked at. Why not just make and use 1kv diodes alone? 73, Mike, KK6GM |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further,
they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the funnie this is that the $$$ diference is not seen at the costumers end.
do you realy care the the diode is 3 Cents more (making a 100$ project)from the low votalge one.......(some stores some cases) 73's -- http://www.qsl.net/sv1hao "Bob" wrote in message ... Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further, they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() the funnie this is that the $$$ diference is not seen at the costumers end. do you realy care the the diode is 3 Cents more (making a 100$ project)from the low votalge one.......(some stores some cases) You might be surprised. In fact, cost reduction is a *big* issue in the manufacture of many (most?) consumer electronic products. Look at it this way: if you save three cents on a single part, of which only one is used in a $100 device... and you manufacture a million of these devices per year... then you've saved $30,000 per year. That's not chump-change. If you can save $.03 per part, and you use ten of these parts per device, and you manufacture a million units per year - then you've just saved $300,000, which will cover the cost (salary and overhead) of at least one good engineer. Yes, my friend, big electronics companies _do_ care - a lot - about shaving the pennies out of the bill-of-materials cost of the devices they manufacture. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() the funnie this is that the $$$ diference is not seen at the costumers end. do you realy care the the diode is 3 Cents more (making a 100$ project)from the low votalge one.......(some stores some cases) You might be surprised. In fact, cost reduction is a *big* issue in the manufacture of many (most?) consumer electronic products. Look at it this way: if you save three cents on a single part, of which only one is used in a $100 device... and you manufacture a million of these devices per year... then you've saved $30,000 per year. That's not chump-change. If you can save $.03 per part, and you use ten of these parts per device, and you manufacture a million units per year - then you've just saved $300,000, which will cover the cost (salary and overhead) of at least one good engineer. Yes, my friend, big electronics companies _do_ care - a lot - about shaving the pennies out of the bill-of-materials cost of the devices they manufacture. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Hosting the Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
the funnie this is that the $$$ diference is not seen at the costumers end.
do you realy care the the diode is 3 Cents more (making a 100$ project)from the low votalge one.......(some stores some cases) 73's -- http://www.qsl.net/sv1hao "Bob" wrote in message ... Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further, they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:39:33 -0700, "Bob"
wrote: Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further, they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. While the 1 kV 1N4007 is definitely a different creature (with some PIN diode characteristics) compared to the lower voltage 1N4001-1N4006 rectifiers, I very much doubt that they make separate wafers for 1N4001, 1N4002 etc. but instead try to make, say a 500 V rectifier. My guess is that they just measure the reverse leakage voltage at various voltages and print a different label, based on these measurements. Those passing only the 50 V test will be labelled 1N4001 and sold at a slightly lower price and so on. If there is a huge order for 1N4001 and there is not enough 50 V units produced, some units tested OK for 100-500 V are labelled 1N4001 to full fill the large order. Thus, some selected 1N4001 parts may work even above 100 V. Paul OH3LWR |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:39:33 -0700, "Bob"
wrote: Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further, they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. While the 1 kV 1N4007 is definitely a different creature (with some PIN diode characteristics) compared to the lower voltage 1N4001-1N4006 rectifiers, I very much doubt that they make separate wafers for 1N4001, 1N4002 etc. but instead try to make, say a 500 V rectifier. My guess is that they just measure the reverse leakage voltage at various voltages and print a different label, based on these measurements. Those passing only the 50 V test will be labelled 1N4001 and sold at a slightly lower price and so on. If there is a huge order for 1N4001 and there is not enough 50 V units produced, some units tested OK for 100-500 V are labelled 1N4001 to full fill the large order. Thus, some selected 1N4001 parts may work even above 100 V. Paul OH3LWR |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lower voltage rectifiers are easier to make and therefore cheaper. Further,
they have lower forward drop and are faster. No point in using too high a rating if these other factors are worth considering. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
physical/intuitive understanding of RL/RC time constants? | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna |