RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Homebrew (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/)
-   -   inductor properties query (https://www.radiobanter.com/homebrew/21801-inductor-properties-query.html)

James W December 5th 03 06:24 PM

John,

It's been a while (20 years) since I took calculus, but I'm pretty sure
the slope of a sine wave at the zero crossing is +-1.

What value do you believe the slope to be?



John Popelish wrote:
James W wrote:

at the 90deg point, the I curve is crossing the zero point. It's a sine
wave. Sine waves of amplitude 1 have a slope of 1 at the zero crossing, no?



No. If the period is 1 and the peak to peak amplitude is 1, the only
way the slope could be 1 would be if it were a saw tooth wave.



James W December 5th 03 08:53 PM

Well, I wish I could do a good drawing here... but
If we assume that at 0deg, voltage is zero, then, at 90 degrees, voltage
is max. With a perfect inductor, current lags voltage by 90 degrees, so
current is 0. Current is a sine wave. So.. why isn't di/dt==1 at this point?

Joe McElvenney wrote:
Hi,

John is right, di/dt isn't equal to one here. You are mixing
up seconds and degrees.


Cheers - Joe




James W December 5th 03 08:53 PM

Well, I wish I could do a good drawing here... but
If we assume that at 0deg, voltage is zero, then, at 90 degrees, voltage
is max. With a perfect inductor, current lags voltage by 90 degrees, so
current is 0. Current is a sine wave. So.. why isn't di/dt==1 at this point?

Joe McElvenney wrote:
Hi,

John is right, di/dt isn't equal to one here. You are mixing
up seconds and degrees.


Cheers - Joe




Joe McElvenney December 5th 03 10:54 PM

Hi,

You have declared a frequency of 1Hz (i.e. one cycle per
second) for your source.

OK, now draw a sine wave with a triangular wave of the same
peak amplitude inside it. You should be able to see that the
initial slope (di/dt) of the triangle is much greater than one
amp per second, in fact it is four times that since it reaches
its peak in a quarter of a second. Now look at the sine wave - at
the crossing it is steeper than the triangle.


Cheers - Joe



Joe McElvenney December 5th 03 10:54 PM

Hi,

You have declared a frequency of 1Hz (i.e. one cycle per
second) for your source.

OK, now draw a sine wave with a triangular wave of the same
peak amplitude inside it. You should be able to see that the
initial slope (di/dt) of the triangle is much greater than one
amp per second, in fact it is four times that since it reaches
its peak in a quarter of a second. Now look at the sine wave - at
the crossing it is steeper than the triangle.


Cheers - Joe



John Popelish December 5th 03 11:10 PM

James W wrote:

John,

It's been a while (20 years) since I took calculus, but I'm pretty sure
the slope of a sine wave at the zero crossing is +-1.

What value do you believe the slope to be?


The sine wave voltage was specified as 1 volt peak to peak (+- .5
volt) The impedance of the inductor was specified as 1 ohm. So
current peaks at +- .5 amp. A sine wave that has a peak value of +-
..5 and a period of 1 unit of time has a peak slope of pi/sec or
2*pi*(peak amplitude)/period.

--
John Popelish

John Popelish December 5th 03 11:10 PM

James W wrote:

John,

It's been a while (20 years) since I took calculus, but I'm pretty sure
the slope of a sine wave at the zero crossing is +-1.

What value do you believe the slope to be?


The sine wave voltage was specified as 1 volt peak to peak (+- .5
volt) The impedance of the inductor was specified as 1 ohm. So
current peaks at +- .5 amp. A sine wave that has a peak value of +-
..5 and a period of 1 unit of time has a peak slope of pi/sec or
2*pi*(peak amplitude)/period.

--
John Popelish

James W December 6th 03 01:16 AM

John and Joe are obviously correct... and I... am an idiot.

Gentlemen, thanks for helping... it took me a while.. but now I've got it..

- jim

John Popelish wrote:
James W wrote:

Consider a simple inductive cicuit with a 1v(p-to-p) AC source at
1Hz,and an inductor with Z=1ohm.

The inductors value would be 1ohm=2*pi*1Hz*L, so L= 1/2pi

Looking at the standard Voltage and Current drawings, we see current
lagging voltage by 90degrees.

Here's my problem. At 90 degrees, the applied voltage is 1volt. The
current is zero. di/dt is 1,


(snip)

Tell me how you arrived at this di/dt.



James W December 6th 03 01:16 AM

John and Joe are obviously correct... and I... am an idiot.

Gentlemen, thanks for helping... it took me a while.. but now I've got it..

- jim

John Popelish wrote:
James W wrote:

Consider a simple inductive cicuit with a 1v(p-to-p) AC source at
1Hz,and an inductor with Z=1ohm.

The inductors value would be 1ohm=2*pi*1Hz*L, so L= 1/2pi

Looking at the standard Voltage and Current drawings, we see current
lagging voltage by 90degrees.

Here's my problem. At 90 degrees, the applied voltage is 1volt. The
current is zero. di/dt is 1,


(snip)

Tell me how you arrived at this di/dt.



John Popelish December 6th 03 02:16 AM

James W wrote:
....
Gentlemen, thanks for helping... it took me a while.. but now I've got it..


Glad to help.
--
John Popelish


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com